Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio versus Fractional Flow Reserve guided intervention (iFR-SWEDEHEART): Rationale and design of a multicenter, prospective, registry-based randomized clinical trial.
(2015) In American Heart Journal 170(5). p.945-950- Abstract
- Instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) is a new hemodynamic resting index for assessment of coronary artery stenosis severity. iFR uses high frequency sampling to calculate a gradient across a coronary lesion during a period of diastole. The index has been tested against fractional flow reserve (FFR) and found to have an overall classification agreement of 80% to 85%. Whether the level of disagreement is clinically relevant is unknown. Clinical outcome data on iFR are scarce. This study is a registry-based randomized clinical trial, which is a novel strategy using health quality registries as on-line platforms for randomization, case record forms, and follow-up.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/8243018
- author
- Götberg, Matthias LU ; Christiansen, Evald H ; Gudmundsdottir, Ingibjörg ; Sandhall, Lennart ; Omerovic, Elmir ; James, Stefan K ; Erlinge, David LU and Fröbert, Ole
- organization
- publishing date
- 2015
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- American Heart Journal
- volume
- 170
- issue
- 5
- pages
- 945 - 950
- publisher
- Mosby-Elsevier
- external identifiers
-
- pmid:26542503
- wos:000364434600015
- scopus:84954229158
- pmid:26542503
- ISSN
- 1097-6744
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.07.031
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- ce5b0a38-8a7b-4838-aa28-ed6333b0e9ed (old id 8243018)
- alternative location
- http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26542503?dopt=Abstract
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-01 10:54:26
- date last changed
- 2022-03-20 01:10:17
@article{ce5b0a38-8a7b-4838-aa28-ed6333b0e9ed, abstract = {{Instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) is a new hemodynamic resting index for assessment of coronary artery stenosis severity. iFR uses high frequency sampling to calculate a gradient across a coronary lesion during a period of diastole. The index has been tested against fractional flow reserve (FFR) and found to have an overall classification agreement of 80% to 85%. Whether the level of disagreement is clinically relevant is unknown. Clinical outcome data on iFR are scarce. This study is a registry-based randomized clinical trial, which is a novel strategy using health quality registries as on-line platforms for randomization, case record forms, and follow-up.}}, author = {{Götberg, Matthias and Christiansen, Evald H and Gudmundsdottir, Ingibjörg and Sandhall, Lennart and Omerovic, Elmir and James, Stefan K and Erlinge, David and Fröbert, Ole}}, issn = {{1097-6744}}, language = {{eng}}, number = {{5}}, pages = {{945--950}}, publisher = {{Mosby-Elsevier}}, series = {{American Heart Journal}}, title = {{Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio versus Fractional Flow Reserve guided intervention (iFR-SWEDEHEART): Rationale and design of a multicenter, prospective, registry-based randomized clinical trial.}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2015.07.031}}, doi = {{10.1016/j.ahj.2015.07.031}}, volume = {{170}}, year = {{2015}}, }