Optimizing probes for multi-beam ptychography
(2026) In Optics Express 34(7). p.12463-12478- Abstract
Multi-beam ptychography (MBP) offers a scalable solution to improve the throughput of state-of-the-art ptychography by increasing the number of coherent beams that illuminate the sample simultaneously. However, increasing the number of beams in ptychography makes ptychographical reconstructions more challenging and less robust. It has been demonstrated that MBP reconstructions can be made more robust by using well-structured and mutually separable probes. Here, we present a quantitative framework to assess probe sets based on separability, uniformity, and fabrication feasibility. We show that Hadamard-based phase masks consistently outperform Zernike polynomials, experimentally feasible phase plates, and spiral phase masks in MBP across... (More)
Multi-beam ptychography (MBP) offers a scalable solution to improve the throughput of state-of-the-art ptychography by increasing the number of coherent beams that illuminate the sample simultaneously. However, increasing the number of beams in ptychography makes ptychographical reconstructions more challenging and less robust. It has been demonstrated that MBP reconstructions can be made more robust by using well-structured and mutually separable probes. Here, we present a quantitative framework to assess probe sets based on separability, uniformity, and fabrication feasibility. We show that Hadamard-based phase masks consistently outperform Zernike polynomials, experimentally feasible phase plates, and spiral phase masks in MBP across varying scan densities. While spiral masks yield comparable resolution, they scale less efficiently due to increased structural complexity. Our results establish practical criteria for evaluating and designing structured probes to enable more robust and scalable implementation of MBP in high-throughput coherent X-ray and EUV imaging.
(Less)
- author
- Yang, Runqing
LU
; Villanueva-Perez, Pablo
LU
; Li, Tang
; Lyubomirskiy, Mikhail
LU
; Fevola, Giovanni
; Falch, Ken Vidar
; Sztucki, Michael
and Kahnt, Maik
LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2026-04-06
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- Optics Express
- volume
- 34
- issue
- 7
- pages
- 16 pages
- publisher
- Optical Society of America
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:105034716431
- ISSN
- 1094-4087
- DOI
- 10.1364/OE.582830
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- additional info
- Publisher Copyright: © 2026 Optica Publishing Group under the terms of the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement.
- id
- 856d7d7e-d418-44ed-8124-1f09572a53f3
- date added to LUP
- 2026-04-15 16:10:43
- date last changed
- 2026-04-17 08:24:20
@article{856d7d7e-d418-44ed-8124-1f09572a53f3,
abstract = {{<p>Multi-beam ptychography (MBP) offers a scalable solution to improve the throughput of state-of-the-art ptychography by increasing the number of coherent beams that illuminate the sample simultaneously. However, increasing the number of beams in ptychography makes ptychographical reconstructions more challenging and less robust. It has been demonstrated that MBP reconstructions can be made more robust by using well-structured and mutually separable probes. Here, we present a quantitative framework to assess probe sets based on separability, uniformity, and fabrication feasibility. We show that Hadamard-based phase masks consistently outperform Zernike polynomials, experimentally feasible phase plates, and spiral phase masks in MBP across varying scan densities. While spiral masks yield comparable resolution, they scale less efficiently due to increased structural complexity. Our results establish practical criteria for evaluating and designing structured probes to enable more robust and scalable implementation of MBP in high-throughput coherent X-ray and EUV imaging.</p>}},
author = {{Yang, Runqing and Villanueva-Perez, Pablo and Li, Tang and Lyubomirskiy, Mikhail and Fevola, Giovanni and Falch, Ken Vidar and Sztucki, Michael and Kahnt, Maik}},
issn = {{1094-4087}},
language = {{eng}},
month = {{04}},
number = {{7}},
pages = {{12463--12478}},
publisher = {{Optical Society of America}},
series = {{Optics Express}},
title = {{Optimizing probes for multi-beam ptychography}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.582830}},
doi = {{10.1364/OE.582830}},
volume = {{34}},
year = {{2026}},
}