Perception of occupational balance by people with mental illness: A new methodology.
(2016) In Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy 23(4). p.304-313- Abstract
- Aims The aims were to (i) investigate initial construct validity of a tool for assessment of time allocation in occupational balance, and (ii) describe perceived occupational balance and its relationship with socio-demographics, well-being, and personal recovery among people with mental illness. Methods Satisfaction with Daily Occupations and Occupational Balance (SDO-OB) was administered to 226 persons. SDO-OB reflects balance in five occupational domains: work, leisure, home chores, self-care, and overall occupational balance. Indicators for assessing construct validity were: satisfaction with everyday occupations, occupational value, symptom severity, and psychosocial functioning. For the second aim, the data collection included... (More)
- Aims The aims were to (i) investigate initial construct validity of a tool for assessment of time allocation in occupational balance, and (ii) describe perceived occupational balance and its relationship with socio-demographics, well-being, and personal recovery among people with mental illness. Methods Satisfaction with Daily Occupations and Occupational Balance (SDO-OB) was administered to 226 persons. SDO-OB reflects balance in five occupational domains: work, leisure, home chores, self-care, and overall occupational balance. Indicators for assessing construct validity were: satisfaction with everyday occupations, occupational value, symptom severity, and psychosocial functioning. For the second aim, the data collection included socio-demographics, life quality, self-esteem, self-mastery, and personal recovery. Results Occupational balance ratings indicated the participants were either under-occupied or in balance. Few were over-occupied. Feeling in balance was related to greater well-being and recovery compared with being under-occupied. Risk factors for under-occupation were younger age (in relation to work), and higher education (in relation to overall balance). Conclusions Associations with the indicators suggest initial construct validity. The SDO-OB is promising for assessment of occupational balance among people with mental illness. Being under-occupied was detrimental to well-being and recovery, and this indicates the importance of offering more occupational opportunities for people with mental illness. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/8825648
- author
- Eklund, Mona LU and Argentzell, Elisabeth LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2016
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy
- volume
- 23
- issue
- 4
- pages
- 304 - 313
- publisher
- Taylor & Francis
- external identifiers
-
- pmid:26872496
- scopus:84958547645
- pmid:26872496
- wos:000379496600007
- ISSN
- 1651-2014
- DOI
- 10.3109/11038128.2016.1143529
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- c56c8a54-3b01-4510-af68-2e1357f5aabc (old id 8825648)
- alternative location
- http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26872496?dopt=Abstract
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-01 14:24:01
- date last changed
- 2022-02-19 18:50:49
@article{c56c8a54-3b01-4510-af68-2e1357f5aabc, abstract = {{Aims The aims were to (i) investigate initial construct validity of a tool for assessment of time allocation in occupational balance, and (ii) describe perceived occupational balance and its relationship with socio-demographics, well-being, and personal recovery among people with mental illness. Methods Satisfaction with Daily Occupations and Occupational Balance (SDO-OB) was administered to 226 persons. SDO-OB reflects balance in five occupational domains: work, leisure, home chores, self-care, and overall occupational balance. Indicators for assessing construct validity were: satisfaction with everyday occupations, occupational value, symptom severity, and psychosocial functioning. For the second aim, the data collection included socio-demographics, life quality, self-esteem, self-mastery, and personal recovery. Results Occupational balance ratings indicated the participants were either under-occupied or in balance. Few were over-occupied. Feeling in balance was related to greater well-being and recovery compared with being under-occupied. Risk factors for under-occupation were younger age (in relation to work), and higher education (in relation to overall balance). Conclusions Associations with the indicators suggest initial construct validity. The SDO-OB is promising for assessment of occupational balance among people with mental illness. Being under-occupied was detrimental to well-being and recovery, and this indicates the importance of offering more occupational opportunities for people with mental illness.}}, author = {{Eklund, Mona and Argentzell, Elisabeth}}, issn = {{1651-2014}}, language = {{eng}}, number = {{4}}, pages = {{304--313}}, publisher = {{Taylor & Francis}}, series = {{Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy}}, title = {{Perception of occupational balance by people with mental illness: A new methodology.}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/11038128.2016.1143529}}, doi = {{10.3109/11038128.2016.1143529}}, volume = {{23}}, year = {{2016}}, }