Advanced

On the evolution of corporate forms

Samuelsson, Per LU (2005) In University of Illinois Law Review p.15-29
Abstract
The major theme underlying this symposium is the development and growth of many new forms of business associations over the last few decades. These new forms are characterized by a combination of personal freedom from partner/owner liability and far-reaching freedom of contract for partner/owners. The question thus becomes whether this development of new business associations amounts to an extension of limited liability to partnerships or an extension of freedom of contract to corporations. Leading scholars Henry Hansmann, Reinier Kraakman, and Richard Squire have posited that the latter theory prevails. Specifically, these scholars discuss the concepts of "entity shielding"- i.e., how, and to what extent, a firm's assets may be separated,... (More)
The major theme underlying this symposium is the development and growth of many new forms of business associations over the last few decades. These new forms are characterized by a combination of personal freedom from partner/owner liability and far-reaching freedom of contract for partner/owners. The question thus becomes whether this development of new business associations amounts to an extension of limited liability to partnerships or an extension of freedom of contract to corporations. Leading scholars Henry Hansmann, Reinier Kraakman, and Richard Squire have posited that the latter theory prevails. Specifically, these scholars discuss the concepts of "entity shielding"- i.e., how, and to what extent, a firm's assets may be separated, or be kept separate, from the partners/owners' creditors-and "owner shielding"- i.e., how, and to what extent, a partner/owner's assets may be separated, or be kept separate, from the firm's creditors. According to Hansmann et al., entity shielding is logically prior to owner shielding; thus, new forms of business associations have developed through an extension of freedom of contract to corporations. Hansmann et al. believe that this understanding of the evolution of business associations possesses predictive value for future developments in business association law. Professor Samuelsson refers to Hansmann et al.'s entity-shielding-prior-to-owner-shielding theory as the "priority thesis" and claims that it is an empirical rather than logical statement. To test that thesis, he traces the legal development of business associations in Europe and Sweden and concludes that those histories do not support Hansmann et al.'s priority thesis and that there are no regularities in the historical evolution of association law that provide predictive value for the future of association law. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
in
University of Illinois Law Review
issue
1
pages
15 - 29
publisher
University of Illinois
external identifiers
  • wos:000230768900003
  • scopus:23744515396
ISSN
0276-9948
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
90018cb5-e037-4d27-b6b0-724f5997f59f (old id 894986)
alternative location
http://home.law.uiuc.edu/lrev/publications/2000s/2005/2005_1/Samuelsson.pdf
date added to LUP
2008-01-22 15:00:24
date last changed
2017-01-01 05:02:37
@article{90018cb5-e037-4d27-b6b0-724f5997f59f,
  abstract     = {The major theme underlying this symposium is the development and growth of many new forms of business associations over the last few decades. These new forms are characterized by a combination of personal freedom from partner/owner liability and far-reaching freedom of contract for partner/owners. The question thus becomes whether this development of new business associations amounts to an extension of limited liability to partnerships or an extension of freedom of contract to corporations. Leading scholars Henry Hansmann, Reinier Kraakman, and Richard Squire have posited that the latter theory prevails. Specifically, these scholars discuss the concepts of "entity shielding"- i.e., how, and to what extent, a firm's assets may be separated, or be kept separate, from the partners/owners' creditors-and "owner shielding"- i.e., how, and to what extent, a partner/owner's assets may be separated, or be kept separate, from the firm's creditors. According to Hansmann et al., entity shielding is logically prior to owner shielding; thus, new forms of business associations have developed through an extension of freedom of contract to corporations. Hansmann et al. believe that this understanding of the evolution of business associations possesses predictive value for future developments in business association law. Professor Samuelsson refers to Hansmann et al.'s entity-shielding-prior-to-owner-shielding theory as the "priority thesis" and claims that it is an empirical rather than logical statement. To test that thesis, he traces the legal development of business associations in Europe and Sweden and concludes that those histories do not support Hansmann et al.'s priority thesis and that there are no regularities in the historical evolution of association law that provide predictive value for the future of association law.},
  author       = {Samuelsson, Per},
  issn         = {0276-9948},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {1},
  pages        = {15--29},
  publisher    = {University of Illinois},
  series       = {University of Illinois Law Review},
  title        = {On the evolution of corporate forms},
  year         = {2005},
}