Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

The benefits of help in cooperative birds : Nonexistent or difficult to detect?

Downing, Philip A. LU ; Griffin, Ashleigh S. and Cornwallis, Charlie K. LU (2020) In American Naturalist 195(6). p.1085-1091
Abstract

In birds that breed cooperatively in family groups, adult offspring often delay dispersal to assist the breeding pair in raising their young. Kin selection is thought to play an important role in the evolution of this breeding system. However, evidence supporting the underlying assumption that helpers increase the reproductive success of breeders is inconsistent. In 10 out of 19 species where the effect of helpers on breeder reproductive success has been estimated while controlling for the effects of breeder and territory quality, no benefits of help were detected. Here, we use phylogenetic meta-analysis to show that the inconsistent evidence for helper benefits across species is explained by study design. After accounting for low... (More)

In birds that breed cooperatively in family groups, adult offspring often delay dispersal to assist the breeding pair in raising their young. Kin selection is thought to play an important role in the evolution of this breeding system. However, evidence supporting the underlying assumption that helpers increase the reproductive success of breeders is inconsistent. In 10 out of 19 species where the effect of helpers on breeder reproductive success has been estimated while controlling for the effects of breeder and territory quality, no benefits of help were detected. Here, we use phylogenetic meta-analysis to show that the inconsistent evidence for helper benefits across species is explained by study design. After accounting for low sample sizes and the different study designs used to control for breeder and territory quality, we found that helpers consistently enhanced the reproductive success of breeders. Therefore, the assumption that helpers increase breeder reproductive success is supported by evidence across cooperatively breeding birds.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Birds, Cooperative breeding, Indirect fitness, Kin selection, Offspring care
in
American Naturalist
volume
195
issue
6
pages
7 pages
publisher
University of Chicago Press
external identifiers
  • pmid:32469661
  • scopus:85084457989
ISSN
0003-0147
DOI
10.1086/708515
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
8d883df0-bb7d-4dfe-9876-a5293d641424
date added to LUP
2020-06-15 09:12:08
date last changed
2024-06-12 14:57:28
@article{8d883df0-bb7d-4dfe-9876-a5293d641424,
  abstract     = {{<p>In birds that breed cooperatively in family groups, adult offspring often delay dispersal to assist the breeding pair in raising their young. Kin selection is thought to play an important role in the evolution of this breeding system. However, evidence supporting the underlying assumption that helpers increase the reproductive success of breeders is inconsistent. In 10 out of 19 species where the effect of helpers on breeder reproductive success has been estimated while controlling for the effects of breeder and territory quality, no benefits of help were detected. Here, we use phylogenetic meta-analysis to show that the inconsistent evidence for helper benefits across species is explained by study design. After accounting for low sample sizes and the different study designs used to control for breeder and territory quality, we found that helpers consistently enhanced the reproductive success of breeders. Therefore, the assumption that helpers increase breeder reproductive success is supported by evidence across cooperatively breeding birds.</p>}},
  author       = {{Downing, Philip A. and Griffin, Ashleigh S. and Cornwallis, Charlie K.}},
  issn         = {{0003-0147}},
  keywords     = {{Birds; Cooperative breeding; Indirect fitness; Kin selection; Offspring care}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{6}},
  pages        = {{1085--1091}},
  publisher    = {{University of Chicago Press}},
  series       = {{American Naturalist}},
  title        = {{The benefits of help in cooperative birds : Nonexistent or difficult to detect?}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/708515}},
  doi          = {{10.1086/708515}},
  volume       = {{195}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}