Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Cross-classified Multilevel Analysis of Individual Heterogeneity and Discriminatory Accuracy (MAIHDA) to evaluate hospital performance : the case of hospital differences in patient survival after acute myocardial infarction

Rodriguez-Lopez, Merida LU ; Merlo, Juan LU orcid ; Perez-Vicente, Raquel LU ; Austin, Peter and Leckie, George LU (2020) In BMJ Open 10(10).
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe a novel strategy, Multilevel Analysis of Individual Heterogeneity and Discriminatory Accuracy (MAIHDA) to evaluate hospital performance, by analysing differences in 30-day mortality after a first-ever acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in Sweden.

DESIGN: Cross-classified study.

SETTING: 68 Swedish hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS: 43 247 patients admitted between 2007 and 2009, with a first-ever AMI.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: We evaluate hospital performance by analysing differences in 30-day mortality after a first-ever AMI using a cross-classified multilevel analysis. We classified the patients into 10 categories according to a risk score (RS) for 30-day mortality and created 680... (More)

OBJECTIVE: To describe a novel strategy, Multilevel Analysis of Individual Heterogeneity and Discriminatory Accuracy (MAIHDA) to evaluate hospital performance, by analysing differences in 30-day mortality after a first-ever acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in Sweden.

DESIGN: Cross-classified study.

SETTING: 68 Swedish hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS: 43 247 patients admitted between 2007 and 2009, with a first-ever AMI.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: We evaluate hospital performance by analysing differences in 30-day mortality after a first-ever AMI using a cross-classified multilevel analysis. We classified the patients into 10 categories according to a risk score (RS) for 30-day mortality and created 680 strata defined by combining hospital and RS categories.

RESULTS: In the cross-classified multilevel analysis the overall RS adjusted hospital 30-day mortality in Sweden was 4.78% and the between-hospital variation was very small (variance partition coefficient (VPC)=0.70%, area under the curve (AUC)=0.54). The benchmark value was therefore achieved by all hospitals. However, as expected, there were large differences between the RS categories (VPC=34.13%, AUC=0.77) CONCLUSIONS: MAIHDA is a useful tool to evaluate hospital performance. The benefit of this novel approach to adjusting for patient RS is that it allowed one to estimate separate VPCs and AUC statistics to simultaneously evaluate the influence of RS categories and hospital differences on mortality. At the time of our analysis, all hospitals in Sweden were performing homogeneously well. That is, the benchmark target for 30-day mortality was fully achieved and there were not relevant hospital differences. Therefore, possible quality interventions should be universal and oriented to maintain the high hospital quality of care.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
in
BMJ Open
volume
10
issue
10
article number
e036130
publisher
BMJ Publishing Group
external identifiers
  • scopus:85094674508
  • pmid:33099490
ISSN
2044-6055
DOI
10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036130
language
English
LU publication?
yes
additional info
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
id
8fdb98e7-031d-45c6-9ffc-62fed32ef07b
date added to LUP
2020-11-04 09:51:56
date last changed
2024-05-01 19:40:36
@article{8fdb98e7-031d-45c6-9ffc-62fed32ef07b,
  abstract     = {{<p>OBJECTIVE: To describe a novel strategy, Multilevel Analysis of Individual Heterogeneity and Discriminatory Accuracy (MAIHDA) to evaluate hospital performance, by analysing differences in 30-day mortality after a first-ever acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in Sweden.</p><p>DESIGN: Cross-classified study.</p><p>SETTING: 68 Swedish hospitals.</p><p>PARTICIPANTS: 43 247 patients admitted between 2007 and 2009, with a first-ever AMI.</p><p>PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: We evaluate hospital performance by analysing differences in 30-day mortality after a first-ever AMI using a cross-classified multilevel analysis. We classified the patients into 10 categories according to a risk score (RS) for 30-day mortality and created 680 strata defined by combining hospital and RS categories.</p><p>RESULTS: In the cross-classified multilevel analysis the overall RS adjusted hospital 30-day mortality in Sweden was 4.78% and the between-hospital variation was very small (variance partition coefficient (VPC)=0.70%, area under the curve (AUC)=0.54). The benchmark value was therefore achieved by all hospitals. However, as expected, there were large differences between the RS categories (VPC=34.13%, AUC=0.77) CONCLUSIONS: MAIHDA is a useful tool to evaluate hospital performance. The benefit of this novel approach to adjusting for patient RS is that it allowed one to estimate separate VPCs and AUC statistics to simultaneously evaluate the influence of RS categories and hospital differences on mortality. At the time of our analysis, all hospitals in Sweden were performing homogeneously well. That is, the benchmark target for 30-day mortality was fully achieved and there were not relevant hospital differences. Therefore, possible quality interventions should be universal and oriented to maintain the high hospital quality of care.</p>}},
  author       = {{Rodriguez-Lopez, Merida and Merlo, Juan and Perez-Vicente, Raquel and Austin, Peter and Leckie, George}},
  issn         = {{2044-6055}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  month        = {{10}},
  number       = {{10}},
  publisher    = {{BMJ Publishing Group}},
  series       = {{BMJ Open}},
  title        = {{Cross-classified Multilevel Analysis of Individual Heterogeneity and Discriminatory Accuracy (MAIHDA) to evaluate hospital performance : the case of hospital differences in patient survival after acute myocardial infarction}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036130}},
  doi          = {{10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036130}},
  volume       = {{10}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}