Long-term effects of selective dorsal rhizotomy in children with cerebral palsy : a systematic review
(2020) In Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 62(5). p.554-562- Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the long-term effects of selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) 10 years or more after the procedure and complications observed any time after SDR in children with cerebral palsy (CP). Method: Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library were searched from their individual dates of inception through 1st June 2018 for full-text original articles in English that described long-term follow-up after SDR in children with CP. The authors independently screened publications to determine whether they met inclusion criteria; thereafter all authors extracted data on patient characteristics, the proportion of the original cohort being followed-up, and the reported outcomes. Results: Of the 199 studies identified, 16 were included in this... (More)
Aim: To evaluate the long-term effects of selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) 10 years or more after the procedure and complications observed any time after SDR in children with cerebral palsy (CP). Method: Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library were searched from their individual dates of inception through 1st June 2018 for full-text original articles in English that described long-term follow-up after SDR in children with CP. The authors independently screened publications to determine whether they met inclusion criteria; thereafter all authors extracted data on patient characteristics, the proportion of the original cohort being followed-up, and the reported outcomes. Results: Of the 199 studies identified, 16 were included in this evaluation: 14 were case series and two studies reported a retrospectively assigned comparison group. Evidence concerning function was limited by study design differences, clinical variability, loss to follow-up, and heterogeneity across trials. Interpretation: At 10 years or more follow-up, available studies generate low-level evidence with considerable bias. No functional improvement of SDR over routine therapy is documented. Furthermore, the long-term effects of SDR with respect to spasticity reduction is unclear, with many studies reporting a high amount of add-on spasticity treatment. More long-term follow-up using robust scientific protocols is required before it can be decided whether the use of SDR as routine therapy for children with CP is to be recommended or not. What this paper adds: Ten years after selective dorsal rhizotomy, available studies supply inconclusive evidence on functional outcomes. The long-term effect on spasticity is uncertain, studies reported a substantial need for add-on treatment. Short- and long-term complications seem frequent but are not reported in a consistent manner.
(Less)
- author
- Tedroff, Kristina ; Hägglund, Gunnar LU and Miller, Freeman
- organization
- publishing date
- 2020-05
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology
- volume
- 62
- issue
- 5
- pages
- 9 pages
- publisher
- John Wiley & Sons Inc.
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85069928177
- pmid:31342516
- ISSN
- 0012-1622
- DOI
- 10.1111/dmcn.14320
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 91430b41-ebbc-47d2-8cce-47913d340ecf
- date added to LUP
- 2019-08-26 11:21:57
- date last changed
- 2024-06-26 00:43:47
@article{91430b41-ebbc-47d2-8cce-47913d340ecf,
abstract = {{<p>Aim: To evaluate the long-term effects of selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) 10 years or more after the procedure and complications observed any time after SDR in children with cerebral palsy (CP). Method: Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library were searched from their individual dates of inception through 1st June 2018 for full-text original articles in English that described long-term follow-up after SDR in children with CP. The authors independently screened publications to determine whether they met inclusion criteria; thereafter all authors extracted data on patient characteristics, the proportion of the original cohort being followed-up, and the reported outcomes. Results: Of the 199 studies identified, 16 were included in this evaluation: 14 were case series and two studies reported a retrospectively assigned comparison group. Evidence concerning function was limited by study design differences, clinical variability, loss to follow-up, and heterogeneity across trials. Interpretation: At 10 years or more follow-up, available studies generate low-level evidence with considerable bias. No functional improvement of SDR over routine therapy is documented. Furthermore, the long-term effects of SDR with respect to spasticity reduction is unclear, with many studies reporting a high amount of add-on spasticity treatment. More long-term follow-up using robust scientific protocols is required before it can be decided whether the use of SDR as routine therapy for children with CP is to be recommended or not. What this paper adds: Ten years after selective dorsal rhizotomy, available studies supply inconclusive evidence on functional outcomes. The long-term effect on spasticity is uncertain, studies reported a substantial need for add-on treatment. Short- and long-term complications seem frequent but are not reported in a consistent manner.</p>}},
author = {{Tedroff, Kristina and Hägglund, Gunnar and Miller, Freeman}},
issn = {{0012-1622}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{5}},
pages = {{554--562}},
publisher = {{John Wiley & Sons Inc.}},
series = {{Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology}},
title = {{Long-term effects of selective dorsal rhizotomy in children with cerebral palsy : a systematic review}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.14320}},
doi = {{10.1111/dmcn.14320}},
volume = {{62}},
year = {{2020}},
}