Shaping sustainable travel behaviour : Attitude, skills, and access all matter
(2020) In Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 88.- Abstract
Drawing on the conceptualisation of motility as the capacity to be mobile, this paper employs statistical and GIS-based analyses to explore the associations between travel mode choice and mobility-related attitudes, skills and opportunities to access transport modes. The study builds on survey data and spatial data from three urban contexts of Beijing, Gothenburg and Malmo to analyse both individual-level and contextual factors influencing sustainable travel behaviour. The results indicate that despite varying contexts, the three dimensions of attitude, skills and access significantly explain individuals’ travel behaviour and their choice to travel by public transport, bicycle or car. Among the studied travel modes, cycling appears to... (More)
Drawing on the conceptualisation of motility as the capacity to be mobile, this paper employs statistical and GIS-based analyses to explore the associations between travel mode choice and mobility-related attitudes, skills and opportunities to access transport modes. The study builds on survey data and spatial data from three urban contexts of Beijing, Gothenburg and Malmo to analyse both individual-level and contextual factors influencing sustainable travel behaviour. The results indicate that despite varying contexts, the three dimensions of attitude, skills and access significantly explain individuals’ travel behaviour and their choice to travel by public transport, bicycle or car. Among the studied travel modes, cycling appears to be a competitive mode when the travel distances are within 5 km. In all three urban contexts, individuals who have greater environmental awareness are more likely to travel by public transport or cycling if the physical conditions facilitate using these modes. Good access to public transport is likely to increase the usage of both cycling and public transport and reduce car use. Favourable conditions for cycling within 2 km and 5 km radius can positively encourage people to use a bicycle as a feeder mode for public transport. Overall, our findings demonstrate that for mobility policies to increase individuals’ motility in relation to sustainable travel modes and encourage a travel behaviour shift towards using alternatives to cars, planners need to take more holistic approaches and design policies that deal with the three motility dimensions in an integrated manner and avoid focusing on a single dimension in isolation.
(Less)
- author
- Hamidi, Zahra and Zhao, Chunli LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2020-11
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Cycling, Intermodality, Mode choice, Motility, Public transport, Sustainable travel
- in
- Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment
- volume
- 88
- article number
- 102566
- publisher
- Elsevier
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85092182997
- ISSN
- 1361-9209
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102566
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 9379e375-c471-4189-833f-c3cb3800d27a
- date added to LUP
- 2020-10-22 11:06:51
- date last changed
- 2022-04-19 01:11:05
@article{9379e375-c471-4189-833f-c3cb3800d27a,
abstract = {{<p>Drawing on the conceptualisation of motility as the capacity to be mobile, this paper employs statistical and GIS-based analyses to explore the associations between travel mode choice and mobility-related attitudes, skills and opportunities to access transport modes. The study builds on survey data and spatial data from three urban contexts of Beijing, Gothenburg and Malmo to analyse both individual-level and contextual factors influencing sustainable travel behaviour. The results indicate that despite varying contexts, the three dimensions of attitude, skills and access significantly explain individuals’ travel behaviour and their choice to travel by public transport, bicycle or car. Among the studied travel modes, cycling appears to be a competitive mode when the travel distances are within 5 km. In all three urban contexts, individuals who have greater environmental awareness are more likely to travel by public transport or cycling if the physical conditions facilitate using these modes. Good access to public transport is likely to increase the usage of both cycling and public transport and reduce car use. Favourable conditions for cycling within 2 km and 5 km radius can positively encourage people to use a bicycle as a feeder mode for public transport. Overall, our findings demonstrate that for mobility policies to increase individuals’ motility in relation to sustainable travel modes and encourage a travel behaviour shift towards using alternatives to cars, planners need to take more holistic approaches and design policies that deal with the three motility dimensions in an integrated manner and avoid focusing on a single dimension in isolation.</p>}},
author = {{Hamidi, Zahra and Zhao, Chunli}},
issn = {{1361-9209}},
keywords = {{Cycling; Intermodality; Mode choice; Motility; Public transport; Sustainable travel}},
language = {{eng}},
publisher = {{Elsevier}},
series = {{Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment}},
title = {{Shaping sustainable travel behaviour : Attitude, skills, and access all matter}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102566}},
doi = {{10.1016/j.trd.2020.102566}},
volume = {{88}},
year = {{2020}},
}