Development of foot length in children with congenital clubfoot up to 7 years of age : a prospective follow-up study
(2021) In BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 22(1).- Abstract
Background: Clubfeet are typically shorter than normal feet. This study aimed first to describe the development of foot length in a consecutive series of children with congenital clubfoot and second to relate foot length to development of relapse and motion quality. Methods: Foot length was measured every 6 months in 72 consecutive children with congenital clubfoot (29 bilateral) aged from 2 to 7 years. The initial treatment was nonsurgical followed by standardized orthotic treatment. Foot length growth rate was calculated every half year. In children with unilateral clubfeet, the difference in foot length between the clubfoot and the contralateral foot was calculated. Motion quality was evaluated by the Clubfoot Assessment Protocol... (More)
Background: Clubfeet are typically shorter than normal feet. This study aimed first to describe the development of foot length in a consecutive series of children with congenital clubfoot and second to relate foot length to development of relapse and motion quality. Methods: Foot length was measured every 6 months in 72 consecutive children with congenital clubfoot (29 bilateral) aged from 2 to 7 years. The initial treatment was nonsurgical followed by standardized orthotic treatment. Foot length growth rate was calculated every half year. In children with unilateral clubfeet, the difference in foot length between the clubfoot and the contralateral foot was calculated. Motion quality was evaluated by the Clubfoot Assessment Protocol (CAP). Student’s t test, the Mann–Whitney U test and Spearman’s correlation were used for group comparisons. Bonferroni correction was used when multiple comparisons were performed. Results: Clubfeet were smaller (P < 0.001) than reference feet at all ages but had a similar growth rate up to age 7. Unilateral clubfeet with greater difference in size compared with the contralateral foot at the first measurement, relapsed more frequently (P = 0.016) and correlated with poorer motion quality (r = 0.4; P = 0.011). Conclusions: As previously reported, clubfeet were smaller than reference feet at all ages. The growth rate, however, was similar between clubfeet and reference feet. Children with unilateral clubfeet and greater foot length difference at 2 years of age had a higher tendency to relapse and poorer motion quality at 7 years of age, indicating that foot length could be used as a prognostic tool.
(Less)
- author
- Manousaki, Evgenia LU ; Esbjörnsson, Anna Clara LU ; Hägglund, Gunnar LU and Andriesse, Hanneke LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2021-12
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Clubfoot, Foot growth, Foot length, Relapse
- in
- BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
- volume
- 22
- issue
- 1
- article number
- 487
- publisher
- BioMed Central (BMC)
- external identifiers
-
- pmid:34044803
- scopus:85106990096
- ISSN
- 1471-2474
- DOI
- 10.1186/s12891-021-04323-4
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 95e954b6-9a30-4a40-ae50-093a33eb3ea3
- date added to LUP
- 2022-03-08 13:15:56
- date last changed
- 2024-03-31 01:07:02
@article{95e954b6-9a30-4a40-ae50-093a33eb3ea3,
abstract = {{<p>Background: Clubfeet are typically shorter than normal feet. This study aimed first to describe the development of foot length in a consecutive series of children with congenital clubfoot and second to relate foot length to development of relapse and motion quality. Methods: Foot length was measured every 6 months in 72 consecutive children with congenital clubfoot (29 bilateral) aged from 2 to 7 years. The initial treatment was nonsurgical followed by standardized orthotic treatment. Foot length growth rate was calculated every half year. In children with unilateral clubfeet, the difference in foot length between the clubfoot and the contralateral foot was calculated. Motion quality was evaluated by the Clubfoot Assessment Protocol (CAP). Student’s t test, the Mann–Whitney U test and Spearman’s correlation were used for group comparisons. Bonferroni correction was used when multiple comparisons were performed. Results: Clubfeet were smaller (P < 0.001) than reference feet at all ages but had a similar growth rate up to age 7. Unilateral clubfeet with greater difference in size compared with the contralateral foot at the first measurement, relapsed more frequently (P = 0.016) and correlated with poorer motion quality (r = 0.4; P = 0.011). Conclusions: As previously reported, clubfeet were smaller than reference feet at all ages. The growth rate, however, was similar between clubfeet and reference feet. Children with unilateral clubfeet and greater foot length difference at 2 years of age had a higher tendency to relapse and poorer motion quality at 7 years of age, indicating that foot length could be used as a prognostic tool.</p>}},
author = {{Manousaki, Evgenia and Esbjörnsson, Anna Clara and Hägglund, Gunnar and Andriesse, Hanneke}},
issn = {{1471-2474}},
keywords = {{Clubfoot; Foot growth; Foot length; Relapse}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{1}},
publisher = {{BioMed Central (BMC)}},
series = {{BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders}},
title = {{Development of foot length in children with congenital clubfoot up to 7 years of age : a prospective follow-up study}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04323-4}},
doi = {{10.1186/s12891-021-04323-4}},
volume = {{22}},
year = {{2021}},
}