Dissonance and abstraction: Cognitive conflict leads to higher level of construal
(2018) In European Journal of Social Psychology 48. p.100-107- Abstract
- This study investigated the effects of cognitive conflict on abstract thinking. According to action-identification theory, an ambiguous and unfamiliar situation might propel an individual to a more abstract mindset. Based on this premise, cognitive conflict was hypothesized to put people in an abstract mindset. The induced compliance paradigm, in which participants are asked to write a counter-attitudinal essay under either low choice (producing little dissonance) or high choice (producing more dissonance), was employed. Results showed that an abstract mindset was in fact activated in the induced compliance paradigm, and this effect was more pronounced for participants having a more concrete mindset to begin with. The results suggest that... (More)
- This study investigated the effects of cognitive conflict on abstract thinking. According to action-identification theory, an ambiguous and unfamiliar situation might propel an individual to a more abstract mindset. Based on this premise, cognitive conflict was hypothesized to put people in an abstract mindset. The induced compliance paradigm, in which participants are asked to write a counter-attitudinal essay under either low choice (producing little dissonance) or high choice (producing more dissonance), was employed. Results showed that an abstract mindset was in fact activated in the induced compliance paradigm, and this effect was more pronounced for participants having a more concrete mindset to begin with. The results suggest that the experience of cognitive conflict is closely related to increased abstraction.
(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/960ac6c0-9021-41ca-adac-cb2f844b9ca7
- author
- Cancino-Montecinos, Sebastian ; Björklund, Fredrik LU and Lindholm, Torun
- organization
- publishing date
- 2018-02-05
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- dissonance, abstraction, cognitive conflict, induced compliance, action identification theory
- in
- European Journal of Social Psychology
- volume
- 48
- pages
- 100 - 107
- publisher
- John Wiley & Sons Inc.
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85033804830
- ISSN
- 1099-0992
- DOI
- 10.1002/ejsp.2287
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 960ac6c0-9021-41ca-adac-cb2f844b9ca7
- date added to LUP
- 2017-05-25 13:11:19
- date last changed
- 2022-04-25 00:18:48
@article{960ac6c0-9021-41ca-adac-cb2f844b9ca7, abstract = {{This study investigated the effects of cognitive conflict on abstract thinking. According to action-identification theory, an ambiguous and unfamiliar situation might propel an individual to a more abstract mindset. Based on this premise, cognitive conflict was hypothesized to put people in an abstract mindset. The induced compliance paradigm, in which participants are asked to write a counter-attitudinal essay under either low choice (producing little dissonance) or high choice (producing more dissonance), was employed. Results showed that an abstract mindset was in fact activated in the induced compliance paradigm, and this effect was more pronounced for participants having a more concrete mindset to begin with. The results suggest that the experience of cognitive conflict is closely related to increased abstraction.<br/>}}, author = {{Cancino-Montecinos, Sebastian and Björklund, Fredrik and Lindholm, Torun}}, issn = {{1099-0992}}, keywords = {{dissonance; abstraction; cognitive conflict; induced compliance; action identification theory}}, language = {{eng}}, month = {{02}}, pages = {{100--107}}, publisher = {{John Wiley & Sons Inc.}}, series = {{European Journal of Social Psychology}}, title = {{Dissonance and abstraction: Cognitive conflict leads to higher level of construal}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2287}}, doi = {{10.1002/ejsp.2287}}, volume = {{48}}, year = {{2018}}, }