On word order and case in Old Italian past participle constructions
(2022) In Isogloss 8(3). p.1-20- Abstract
While in Modern Italian, V1 is mandatory in absolute constructions, no such restriction is operative in Old Italian. On the surface, such a fact could be interpreted as a sign of residual V-to-Comp movement in Modern Italian. However, it is not: In Old Italian, participles targeted a position lower than Comp and, hence, the V1 pattern of Modern Italian is an innovation rather than a residue from the earlier stage. The difference between the two grammars lies in the interaction of independent properties of Old Italian and Modern Italian: First, in Old Italian, two arguments can be case licensed because of the presence of a Tense Phrase in the participle clause. In Modern Italian, where no Tense Phrase is projected, nominative can only be... (More)
While in Modern Italian, V1 is mandatory in absolute constructions, no such restriction is operative in Old Italian. On the surface, such a fact could be interpreted as a sign of residual V-to-Comp movement in Modern Italian. However, it is not: In Old Italian, participles targeted a position lower than Comp and, hence, the V1 pattern of Modern Italian is an innovation rather than a residue from the earlier stage. The difference between the two grammars lies in the interaction of independent properties of Old Italian and Modern Italian: First, in Old Italian, two arguments can be case licensed because of the presence of a Tense Phrase in the participle clause. In Modern Italian, where no Tense Phrase is projected, nominative can only be licensed by focus as an instance of default case assignment. Second, a general change relating to information structure has as its consequence that a focused argument is realized post-verbally in Modern Italian, which explains the obligatory V1 pattern.
(Less)
- author
- Egerland, Verner LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2022
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- default case, gerund, Old Italian, participle, V1
- in
- Isogloss
- volume
- 8
- issue
- 3
- article number
- 6
- pages
- 1 - 20
- publisher
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85137089321
- ISSN
- 2385-4138
- DOI
- 10.5565/rev/isogloss.195
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 96957f79-c171-47c2-addc-846fba814e65
- date added to LUP
- 2022-11-09 12:07:08
- date last changed
- 2023-01-24 13:51:27
@article{96957f79-c171-47c2-addc-846fba814e65,
abstract = {{<p>While in Modern Italian, V1 is mandatory in absolute constructions, no such restriction is operative in Old Italian. On the surface, such a fact could be interpreted as a sign of residual V-to-Comp movement in Modern Italian. However, it is not: In Old Italian, participles targeted a position lower than Comp and, hence, the V1 pattern of Modern Italian is an innovation rather than a residue from the earlier stage. The difference between the two grammars lies in the interaction of independent properties of Old Italian and Modern Italian: First, in Old Italian, two arguments can be case licensed because of the presence of a Tense Phrase in the participle clause. In Modern Italian, where no Tense Phrase is projected, nominative can only be licensed by focus as an instance of default case assignment. Second, a general change relating to information structure has as its consequence that a focused argument is realized post-verbally in Modern Italian, which explains the obligatory V1 pattern.</p>}},
author = {{Egerland, Verner}},
issn = {{2385-4138}},
keywords = {{default case; gerund; Old Italian; participle; V1}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{3}},
pages = {{1--20}},
publisher = {{Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona}},
series = {{Isogloss}},
title = {{On word order and case in Old Italian past participle constructions}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.5565/rev/isogloss.195}},
doi = {{10.5565/rev/isogloss.195}},
volume = {{8}},
year = {{2022}},
}