Perfusion MRI of brain tumours: a comparative study of pseudo-continuous arterial spin labelling and dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging
(2010) In Neuroradiology 52(4). p.307-317- Abstract
- The purpose of this study was to compare the non-invasive 3D pseudo-continuous arterial spin labelling (PC ASL) technique with the clinically established dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion magnetic resonance imaging (DSC-MRI) for evaluation of brain tumours. A prospective study of 28 patients with contrast-enhancing brain tumours was performed at 3 T using DSC-MRI and PC ASL with whole-brain coverage. The visual qualitative evaluation of signal enhancement in tumour was scored from 0 to 3 (0 = no signal enhancement compared with white matter, 3 = pronounced signal enhancement with equal or higher signal intensity than in grey matter/basal ganglia). The extent of susceptibility artefacts in the tumour was scored from 0 to 2 (0 = no... (More)
- The purpose of this study was to compare the non-invasive 3D pseudo-continuous arterial spin labelling (PC ASL) technique with the clinically established dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion magnetic resonance imaging (DSC-MRI) for evaluation of brain tumours. A prospective study of 28 patients with contrast-enhancing brain tumours was performed at 3 T using DSC-MRI and PC ASL with whole-brain coverage. The visual qualitative evaluation of signal enhancement in tumour was scored from 0 to 3 (0 = no signal enhancement compared with white matter, 3 = pronounced signal enhancement with equal or higher signal intensity than in grey matter/basal ganglia). The extent of susceptibility artefacts in the tumour was scored from 0 to 2 (0 = no susceptibility artefacts and 2 = extensive susceptibility artefacts (maximum diameter > 2 cm)). A quantitative analysis was performed with normalised tumour blood flow values (ASL nTBF, DSC nTBF): mean value for region of interest (ROI) in an area with maximum signal enhancement/the mean value for ROIs in cerebellum. There was no difference in total visual score for signal enhancement between PC ASL and DSC relative cerebral blood flow (p = 0.12). ASL had a lower susceptibility-artefact score than DSC-MRI (p = 0.03). There was good correlation between DSC nTBF and ASL nTBF values with a correlation coefficient of 0.82. PC ASL is an alternative to DSC-MRI for the evaluation of perfusion in brain tumours. The method has fewer susceptibility artefacts than DSC-MRI and can be used in patients with renal failure because no contrast injection is needed. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/1588235
- author
- Jarnum, Hanna
; Steffensen, Elena G.
; Knutsson, Linda
LU
; Frund, Ernst-Torben ; Simonsen, Carsten Wiberg ; Lundbye-Christensen, Soren ; Shankaranarayanan, Ajit ; Alsop, David C. ; Jensen, Finn Taagehoj and Larsson, Elna-Marie
- organization
- publishing date
- 2010
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Brain neoplasms, DSC-MRI, ASL, Magnetic resonance imaging, Perfusion
- in
- Neuroradiology
- volume
- 52
- issue
- 4
- pages
- 307 - 317
- publisher
- Springer
- external identifiers
-
- wos:000275422000006
- scopus:77953049771
- pmid:19841916
- ISSN
- 1432-1920
- DOI
- 10.1007/s00234-009-0616-6
- project
- Optimisation and Validation of Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast MRI
- MRI brain perfusion quantification at 3 tesla using arterial spin labeling
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 9a152d45-0b9e-4326-99c4-3b7ff458ba85 (old id 1588235)
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-01 11:04:34
- date last changed
- 2025-04-04 15:11:20
@article{9a152d45-0b9e-4326-99c4-3b7ff458ba85, abstract = {{The purpose of this study was to compare the non-invasive 3D pseudo-continuous arterial spin labelling (PC ASL) technique with the clinically established dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion magnetic resonance imaging (DSC-MRI) for evaluation of brain tumours. A prospective study of 28 patients with contrast-enhancing brain tumours was performed at 3 T using DSC-MRI and PC ASL with whole-brain coverage. The visual qualitative evaluation of signal enhancement in tumour was scored from 0 to 3 (0 = no signal enhancement compared with white matter, 3 = pronounced signal enhancement with equal or higher signal intensity than in grey matter/basal ganglia). The extent of susceptibility artefacts in the tumour was scored from 0 to 2 (0 = no susceptibility artefacts and 2 = extensive susceptibility artefacts (maximum diameter > 2 cm)). A quantitative analysis was performed with normalised tumour blood flow values (ASL nTBF, DSC nTBF): mean value for region of interest (ROI) in an area with maximum signal enhancement/the mean value for ROIs in cerebellum. There was no difference in total visual score for signal enhancement between PC ASL and DSC relative cerebral blood flow (p = 0.12). ASL had a lower susceptibility-artefact score than DSC-MRI (p = 0.03). There was good correlation between DSC nTBF and ASL nTBF values with a correlation coefficient of 0.82. PC ASL is an alternative to DSC-MRI for the evaluation of perfusion in brain tumours. The method has fewer susceptibility artefacts than DSC-MRI and can be used in patients with renal failure because no contrast injection is needed.}}, author = {{Jarnum, Hanna and Steffensen, Elena G. and Knutsson, Linda and Frund, Ernst-Torben and Simonsen, Carsten Wiberg and Lundbye-Christensen, Soren and Shankaranarayanan, Ajit and Alsop, David C. and Jensen, Finn Taagehoj and Larsson, Elna-Marie}}, issn = {{1432-1920}}, keywords = {{Brain neoplasms; DSC-MRI; ASL; Magnetic resonance imaging; Perfusion}}, language = {{eng}}, number = {{4}}, pages = {{307--317}}, publisher = {{Springer}}, series = {{Neuroradiology}}, title = {{Perfusion MRI of brain tumours: a comparative study of pseudo-continuous arterial spin labelling and dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-009-0616-6}}, doi = {{10.1007/s00234-009-0616-6}}, volume = {{52}}, year = {{2010}}, }