The Possibility of Developmental States in Africa
(2019)- Abstract
- Since roughly the turn of the millennium, there has been a growing literature discussing the potential characteristics of African Developmental States—if they exists and in that case how they should be defined and exemplified. The basis for this literature has been the experience of the trajectory for sustained economic growth in Pacific Asia. But it has expanded into a broader discussion about the role of authoritarian regimes versus democratic states, outcomes versus intentions, and overall ambitions versus concrete strategies. The most common suggestions for African counterparts have been the two growth miracles—Botswana and Mauritius, although other countries such as South Africa, Rwanda, and Ethiopia have also been on the agenda. The... (More)
- Since roughly the turn of the millennium, there has been a growing literature discussing the potential characteristics of African Developmental States—if they exists and in that case how they should be defined and exemplified. The basis for this literature has been the experience of the trajectory for sustained economic growth in Pacific Asia. But it has expanded into a broader discussion about the role of authoritarian regimes versus democratic states, outcomes versus intentions, and overall ambitions versus concrete strategies. The most common suggestions for African counterparts have been the two growth miracles—Botswana and Mauritius, although other countries such as South Africa, Rwanda, and Ethiopia have also been on the agenda. The original Developmental State concept entails a specific type of social engineering that has so far been rare in Africa: a legitimate state leading a planned capitalist economy with a competent and autonomous bureaucracy spearheading industrialization efforts in profound collaboration with the private sector. With such a narrow definition, it is only the development pathway of Mauritius that can be said to fit the criteria while Botswana falls short due to its weak industrialization efforts, longstanding interconnectedness between the bureaucracy, political power, and cattle elite, and lack of dynamic cooperation between the state and private-sector entrepreneurial groups. Whether or not we will see more examples of African countries following the specific Developmental State trajectory or if they will create alternative development paths to economic diversification, transformation, and prosperity remains to be seen. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/9a3e1853-dd14-4e90-84ec-23fe99d5a56b
- author
- Hillbom, Ellen LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2019
- type
- Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding
- publication status
- epub
- subject
- host publication
- The Oxford Encyclopedia of African Politics
- editor
- Cheeseman, Nic
- publisher
- Oxford University Press
- ISBN
- 9780190632342
- DOI
- 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.879
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 9a3e1853-dd14-4e90-84ec-23fe99d5a56b
- date added to LUP
- 2019-12-25 16:17:09
- date last changed
- 2020-01-07 08:43:28
@inbook{9a3e1853-dd14-4e90-84ec-23fe99d5a56b,
abstract = {{Since roughly the turn of the millennium, there has been a growing literature discussing the potential characteristics of African Developmental States—if they exists and in that case how they should be defined and exemplified. The basis for this literature has been the experience of the trajectory for sustained economic growth in Pacific Asia. But it has expanded into a broader discussion about the role of authoritarian regimes versus democratic states, outcomes versus intentions, and overall ambitions versus concrete strategies. The most common suggestions for African counterparts have been the two growth miracles—Botswana and Mauritius, although other countries such as South Africa, Rwanda, and Ethiopia have also been on the agenda. The original Developmental State concept entails a specific type of social engineering that has so far been rare in Africa: a legitimate state leading a planned capitalist economy with a competent and autonomous bureaucracy spearheading industrialization efforts in profound collaboration with the private sector. With such a narrow definition, it is only the development pathway of Mauritius that can be said to fit the criteria while Botswana falls short due to its weak industrialization efforts, longstanding interconnectedness between the bureaucracy, political power, and cattle elite, and lack of dynamic cooperation between the state and private-sector entrepreneurial groups. Whether or not we will see more examples of African countries following the specific Developmental State trajectory or if they will create alternative development paths to economic diversification, transformation, and prosperity remains to be seen.}},
author = {{Hillbom, Ellen}},
booktitle = {{The Oxford Encyclopedia of African Politics}},
editor = {{Cheeseman, Nic}},
isbn = {{9780190632342}},
language = {{eng}},
publisher = {{Oxford University Press}},
title = {{The Possibility of Developmental States in Africa}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.879}},
doi = {{10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.879}},
year = {{2019}},
}