Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Second comment on 'The climate mitigation gap : Education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions'

Pedersen, Rebecca Laycock LU and Lam, David P.M. (2018) In Environmental Research Letters 13(6).
Abstract

Wynes and Nicholas (2017a Environ. Res. Lett. 12 1-9) recently published an article that reviewed academic and grey literature to identify the most impactful individual actions for reducing carbon emissions in developed countries, identifying having 'one fewer child' as by far the most impactful action. This action was recommended with little context considering its controversial nature. We argue that there are three issue-areas that Wynes and Nicholas should have engaged with to improve the clarity of their recommendations and reduced the potential for misunderstanding, which are (1) the extent to which individual actions in one's private life can address climate change in relation to collective actions and actions in the professional... (More)

Wynes and Nicholas (2017a Environ. Res. Lett. 12 1-9) recently published an article that reviewed academic and grey literature to identify the most impactful individual actions for reducing carbon emissions in developed countries, identifying having 'one fewer child' as by far the most impactful action. This action was recommended with little context considering its controversial nature. We argue that there are three issue-areas that Wynes and Nicholas should have engaged with to improve the clarity of their recommendations and reduced the potential for misunderstanding, which are (1) the extent to which individual actions in one's private life can address climate change in relation to collective actions and actions in the professional sphere (2) the role of overconsumption in driving climate change and (3) the extent to which family planning is a human right. We also suggest that engagement with these issue-areas are a step towards a better practice in academic writing on population as an environmental issue.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
and
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
behaviour change, birth control, climate change, collective action, consumption, family planning, sustainability
in
Environmental Research Letters
volume
13
issue
6
article number
068001
publisher
IOP Publishing
external identifiers
  • scopus:85049801578
ISSN
1748-9318
DOI
10.1088/1748-9326/aac9d0
language
English
LU publication?
no
additional info
Publisher Copyright: © 2018 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd.
id
9ef5476a-0ab8-4720-9cfa-7a67098ccdf3
date added to LUP
2024-09-18 14:59:21
date last changed
2025-04-04 15:31:17
@article{9ef5476a-0ab8-4720-9cfa-7a67098ccdf3,
  abstract     = {{<p>Wynes and Nicholas (2017a Environ. Res. Lett. 12 1-9) recently published an article that reviewed academic and grey literature to identify the most impactful individual actions for reducing carbon emissions in developed countries, identifying having 'one fewer child' as by far the most impactful action. This action was recommended with little context considering its controversial nature. We argue that there are three issue-areas that Wynes and Nicholas should have engaged with to improve the clarity of their recommendations and reduced the potential for misunderstanding, which are (1) the extent to which individual actions in one's private life can address climate change in relation to collective actions and actions in the professional sphere (2) the role of overconsumption in driving climate change and (3) the extent to which family planning is a human right. We also suggest that engagement with these issue-areas are a step towards a better practice in academic writing on population as an environmental issue.</p>}},
  author       = {{Pedersen, Rebecca Laycock and Lam, David P.M.}},
  issn         = {{1748-9318}},
  keywords     = {{behaviour change; birth control; climate change; collective action; consumption; family planning; sustainability}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{6}},
  publisher    = {{IOP Publishing}},
  series       = {{Environmental Research Letters}},
  title        = {{Second comment on 'The climate mitigation gap : Education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions'}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac9d0}},
  doi          = {{10.1088/1748-9326/aac9d0}},
  volume       = {{13}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}