The concurrent validity of the Lund University Checklist for Incipient Exhaustion and the Karolinska Exhaustion Disorder Scale: a replication study
(2023) In BMC Research Notes 16.- Abstract
- Objective
As part of our research on Swedish school principals, we examined the concurrent validity between the Karolinska Exhaustion Disorder Scale (KEDS) and the Lund University Checklist for Incipient Exhaustion (LUCIE) in a cross-sectional study sample (N = 2670). Specifically, we examined: (a) to what extent LUCIE and KEDS identified the same individuals and their level of agreement, and (b) to what extent the present observations among school-principals agreed with previous observations made in a highly educated and healthy study sample drawn from the general population
Results
Depending on established cut-points on LUCIE, the Kappa agreement (K) between LUCIE and KEDS varied between fair (K = 0.34 [95% Confidence... (More) - Objective
As part of our research on Swedish school principals, we examined the concurrent validity between the Karolinska Exhaustion Disorder Scale (KEDS) and the Lund University Checklist for Incipient Exhaustion (LUCIE) in a cross-sectional study sample (N = 2670). Specifically, we examined: (a) to what extent LUCIE and KEDS identified the same individuals and their level of agreement, and (b) to what extent the present observations among school-principals agreed with previous observations made in a highly educated and healthy study sample drawn from the general population
Results
Depending on established cut-points on LUCIE, the Kappa agreement (K) between LUCIE and KEDS varied between fair (K = 0.34 [95% Confidence Interval = 0.30–0.38]) and moderate (K = 0.54 [95% Confidence Interval = 0.51–0.58]). While the instruments did not always identify the same individuals, the most reasonable comparison between KEDS and LUCIE was achieved when the cut-off on LUCIE was made between step two and step three. The results essentially replicated our previous results observed in a highly educated and healthy study sample drawn from the general population. The level of agreement suggests that KEDS and LUCIE scores are supplementary rather than interchangeable. Thus, individual result from KEDS and LUCIE are probably best understood in dialogue with the person screened. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/9f4d152d-01b9-4fdb-a24a-d54af9878c3e
- author
- Persson, Roger LU ; Österberg, Kai LU and Björk, Jonas LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2023-11-09
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Burnout, Exhaustion disorder, KEDS, LUCIE, Mental health, Screening, Stress, Work
- in
- BMC Research Notes
- volume
- 16
- article number
- 325
- publisher
- BioMed Central (BMC)
- external identifiers
-
- pmid:37946315
- scopus:85176280182
- ISSN
- 1756-0500
- DOI
- 10.1186/s13104-023-06589-4
- project
- Skolledares arbetsmiljö del 2: Fördjupande undersökningar av rektorers organisatoriska förutsättningar för ett hållbart skolledarskap
- Skolledares arbetsmiljö: Ett projekt om organisatoriska förutsättningar, stressrelaterad psykisk ohälsa, personalrörlighet och förbättringspotential
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 9f4d152d-01b9-4fdb-a24a-d54af9878c3e
- date added to LUP
- 2023-11-11 16:53:54
- date last changed
- 2024-01-09 09:12:04
@article{9f4d152d-01b9-4fdb-a24a-d54af9878c3e, abstract = {{Objective<br/>As part of our research on Swedish school principals, we examined the concurrent validity between the Karolinska Exhaustion Disorder Scale (KEDS) and the Lund University Checklist for Incipient Exhaustion (LUCIE) in a cross-sectional study sample (N = 2670). Specifically, we examined: (a) to what extent LUCIE and KEDS identified the same individuals and their level of agreement, and (b) to what extent the present observations among school-principals agreed with previous observations made in a highly educated and healthy study sample drawn from the general population<br/><br/>Results<br/>Depending on established cut-points on LUCIE, the Kappa agreement (K) between LUCIE and KEDS varied between fair (K = 0.34 [95% Confidence Interval = 0.30–0.38]) and moderate (K = 0.54 [95% Confidence Interval = 0.51–0.58]). While the instruments did not always identify the same individuals, the most reasonable comparison between KEDS and LUCIE was achieved when the cut-off on LUCIE was made between step two and step three. The results essentially replicated our previous results observed in a highly educated and healthy study sample drawn from the general population. The level of agreement suggests that KEDS and LUCIE scores are supplementary rather than interchangeable. Thus, individual result from KEDS and LUCIE are probably best understood in dialogue with the person screened.}}, author = {{Persson, Roger and Österberg, Kai and Björk, Jonas}}, issn = {{1756-0500}}, keywords = {{Burnout; Exhaustion disorder; KEDS; LUCIE; Mental health; Screening; Stress; Work}}, language = {{eng}}, month = {{11}}, publisher = {{BioMed Central (BMC)}}, series = {{BMC Research Notes}}, title = {{The concurrent validity of the Lund University Checklist for Incipient Exhaustion and the Karolinska Exhaustion Disorder Scale: a replication study}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-023-06589-4}}, doi = {{10.1186/s13104-023-06589-4}}, volume = {{16}}, year = {{2023}}, }