Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

The Missing Link : The implementation of priorities for research, development, and innovation

Brattström, Erik LU (2023) In Lund Studies in Economics and Management
Abstract
The thesis explores the ‘missing link’ in the study of priority-setting for research, development, and innovation (RDI), namely the processes of implementing RDI priorities, and the consequences of these processes. It does so by focusing on how choices, actions, and motivations of implementers of RDI priorities established elsewhere in the policy system enact, or carry out, the priorities, resulting in new conditions for RDI production. Such conditions can be understood as concretizations of the broader, prioritized themes for RDI and ways of organizing RDI within the themes.

The methods, processes, and conditions involved in implementing priorities for RDI on the ‘lower’ levels of decision-making in science policy, such as the... (More)
The thesis explores the ‘missing link’ in the study of priority-setting for research, development, and innovation (RDI), namely the processes of implementing RDI priorities, and the consequences of these processes. It does so by focusing on how choices, actions, and motivations of implementers of RDI priorities established elsewhere in the policy system enact, or carry out, the priorities, resulting in new conditions for RDI production. Such conditions can be understood as concretizations of the broader, prioritized themes for RDI and ways of organizing RDI within the themes.

The methods, processes, and conditions involved in implementing priorities for RDI on the ‘lower’ levels of decision-making in science policy, such as the agency level, have hitherto received limited attention in science policy research in general, and research on priority-setting in particular. Yet, the tension between what policy-makers (at the top) assume RDI can yield (and how) and what implementers (at the bottom) are interested in and capable of delivering, is likely to emerge where broad RDI priorities are enacted by intermediaries such as funding agencies, industry, and research performers. However, we know little about how implementers of RDI priorities go about making priorities implementable and what that means for the emergence of new conditions for RDI production.

The results of the thesis suggest that priority-setting as enacted can be understood as a sequence of socially and cognitively motivated discretionary choices that stimulate creativity and socialization during the implementation of RDI priorities. The thesis refers to this as a ‘socio-cognitive approach to the implementation of RDI priorities’. In their aggregated form, the discretionary choices, and the interactions they yield, shape new conditions for RDI production on content as well as form on the different levels of the policy system. This suggests that choices, interactions, and new condtions amount to a continuation of steering of RDI production after policy-decisions for RDI are made. It also raises some concerns about how discretion may undercut the legitimacy of RDI investments and negatively affect the ‘optimal’ trajectories of scientific fields (e.g. more significant discoveries and/or improved, complementary knowledge about observed phenomena, etc.). This begs the question if there is a need to govern discretion. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
supervisor
opponent
  • Dr Smit, Jorrit, University of Leiden
organization
publishing date
type
Thesis
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Science policy, research, development, innovation (RDI), priority-setting, implementation, street-level discretion, street-level bureaucracy
in
Lund Studies in Economics and Management
issue
165
pages
174 pages
publisher
Lund University
defense location
EC3:211
defense date
2023-04-13 10:15:00
ISBN
978-91-8039-506-9
978-91-8039-507-6
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
a1ae28cf-764e-48f5-bb4b-ae7ad604195d
date added to LUP
2023-03-23 18:49:18
date last changed
2023-09-05 13:09:34
@phdthesis{a1ae28cf-764e-48f5-bb4b-ae7ad604195d,
  abstract     = {{The thesis explores the ‘missing link’ in the study of priority-setting for research, development, and innovation (RDI), namely the processes of implementing RDI priorities, and the consequences of these processes. It does so by focusing on how choices, actions, and motivations of implementers of RDI priorities established elsewhere in the policy system enact, or carry out, the priorities, resulting in new conditions for RDI production. Such conditions can be understood as concretizations of the broader, prioritized themes for RDI and ways of organizing RDI within the themes. <br/><br/>The methods, processes, and conditions involved in implementing priorities for RDI on the ‘lower’ levels of decision-making in science policy, such as the agency level, have hitherto received limited attention in science policy research in general, and research on priority-setting in particular. Yet, the tension between what policy-makers (at the top) assume RDI can yield (and how) and what implementers (at the bottom) are interested in and capable of delivering, is likely to emerge where broad RDI priorities are enacted by intermediaries such as funding agencies, industry, and research performers. However, we know little about how implementers of RDI priorities go about making priorities implementable and what that means for the emergence of new conditions for RDI production. <br/><br/>The results of the thesis suggest that priority-setting as enacted can be understood as a sequence of socially and cognitively motivated discretionary choices that stimulate creativity and socialization during the implementation of RDI priorities. The thesis refers to this as a ‘socio-cognitive approach to the implementation of RDI priorities’. In their aggregated form, the discretionary choices, and the interactions they yield, shape new conditions for RDI production on content as well as form on the different levels of the policy system. This suggests that choices, interactions, and new condtions amount to a continuation of steering of RDI production after policy-decisions for RDI are made. It also raises some concerns about how discretion may undercut the legitimacy of RDI investments and negatively affect the ‘optimal’ trajectories of scientific fields (e.g. more significant discoveries and/or improved, complementary knowledge about observed phenomena, etc.). This begs the question if there is a need to govern discretion.}},
  author       = {{Brattström, Erik}},
  isbn         = {{978-91-8039-506-9}},
  keywords     = {{Science policy; research, development, innovation (RDI); priority-setting; implementation; street-level discretion; street-level bureaucracy}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{165}},
  publisher    = {{Lund University}},
  school       = {{Lund University}},
  series       = {{Lund Studies in Economics and Management}},
  title        = {{The Missing Link : The implementation of priorities for research, development, and innovation}},
  url          = {{https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/files/141255795/The_Missing_Link_the_implementation_of_priorities_for_research_development_and_innovation_Erik_Brattstr_m.pdf}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}