A Schumpeter Hotel? Surname Status Inequality and Persistence in Sweden, 1880–2015
(2026) In Social Science Research 137.- Abstract
- Conventional social mobility research misses substantial inequalities of opportunity. To capture intergenerational persistence of family social status, we need to move beyond parent-child associations in occupation or income. We study the inheritance of surname status as a group-level process, using full-count population data for Swedish men between 1880 and 2015 and surname types reflecting preindustrial social strata. Our analyses show that social stratification by surnames occurs primarily at the level of surname types, rather than at the level of individual lineages, especially before 1950. Surname status inequality is remarkably high in 1880 but declines substantially by 2015. Surname status persistence, on the other hand, is nearly... (More)
- Conventional social mobility research misses substantial inequalities of opportunity. To capture intergenerational persistence of family social status, we need to move beyond parent-child associations in occupation or income. We study the inheritance of surname status as a group-level process, using full-count population data for Swedish men between 1880 and 2015 and surname types reflecting preindustrial social strata. Our analyses show that social stratification by surnames occurs primarily at the level of surname types, rather than at the level of individual lineages, especially before 1950. Surname status inequality is remarkably high in 1880 but declines substantially by 2015. Surname status persistence, on the other hand, is nearly as high in the modern Swedish welfare state as in preindustrial times. Surname groups converge in status at a slow rate, with differences persisting over at least six generations. Structural transformation and the emergence of the welfare state have only implied a limited decline in surname status persistence. As a group, people with agricultural or working-class surname backgrounds (patronyms) experience a persistent status disadvantage, while those with noble and educated surnames have a persistent advantage. Hence, surname status persistence is not only an elite phenomenon but shapes patterns of intergenerational persistence across social classes. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/a213a0a8-3170-4e19-8eb6-ab6ad3e86473
- author
- Dalman, Elien
LU
; Dribe, Martin
LU
and Eriksson, Björn
LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2026-07-01
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- Social Science Research
- volume
- 137
- article number
- 103367
- publisher
- Academic Press
- ISSN
- 0049-089X
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2026.103367
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- a213a0a8-3170-4e19-8eb6-ab6ad3e86473
- date added to LUP
- 2026-04-30 09:20:59
- date last changed
- 2026-05-18 09:50:07
@article{a213a0a8-3170-4e19-8eb6-ab6ad3e86473,
abstract = {{Conventional social mobility research misses substantial inequalities of opportunity. To capture intergenerational persistence of family social status, we need to move beyond parent-child associations in occupation or income. We study the inheritance of surname status as a group-level process, using full-count population data for Swedish men between 1880 and 2015 and surname types reflecting preindustrial social strata. Our analyses show that social stratification by surnames occurs primarily at the level of surname types, rather than at the level of individual lineages, especially before 1950. Surname status inequality is remarkably high in 1880 but declines substantially by 2015. Surname status persistence, on the other hand, is nearly as high in the modern Swedish welfare state as in preindustrial times. Surname groups converge in status at a slow rate, with differences persisting over at least six generations. Structural transformation and the emergence of the welfare state have only implied a limited decline in surname status persistence. As a group, people with agricultural or working-class surname backgrounds (patronyms) experience a persistent status disadvantage, while those with noble and educated surnames have a persistent advantage. Hence, surname status persistence is not only an elite phenomenon but shapes patterns of intergenerational persistence across social classes.}},
author = {{Dalman, Elien and Dribe, Martin and Eriksson, Björn}},
issn = {{0049-089X}},
language = {{eng}},
month = {{07}},
publisher = {{Academic Press}},
series = {{Social Science Research}},
title = {{A Schumpeter Hotel? Surname Status Inequality and Persistence in Sweden, 1880–2015}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2026.103367}},
doi = {{10.1016/j.ssresearch.2026.103367}},
volume = {{137}},
year = {{2026}},
}