Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Understanding cultural ecosystem services related to farmlands : Expert survey in Europe

Balázsi, Ágnes ; Dänhardt, Juliana LU ; Collins, Sue ; Schweiger, Oliver ; Settele, Josef and Hartel, Tibor (2021) In Land Use Policy 100.
Abstract

Cultural ecosystem services (CES) are nonmaterial benefits that people obtain from ecosystems. The CES subcategories cover a wide range of domains (e.g. recreation, conservation of cultural heritage, human-nature relations). The CES concept has been proposed to acknowledge the nonmaterial values linking people and nature in social-ecological systems. Agricultural landscapes are outstanding examples of complex social-ecological systems where synergies and trade-offs between production and conservation determine the CES values. Europe is still rich in such landscapes/systems with outstanding cultural and natural values that deliver a multitude of CES. In this paper, we address the knowledge and perceptions of identified experts on the... (More)

Cultural ecosystem services (CES) are nonmaterial benefits that people obtain from ecosystems. The CES subcategories cover a wide range of domains (e.g. recreation, conservation of cultural heritage, human-nature relations). The CES concept has been proposed to acknowledge the nonmaterial values linking people and nature in social-ecological systems. Agricultural landscapes are outstanding examples of complex social-ecological systems where synergies and trade-offs between production and conservation determine the CES values. Europe is still rich in such landscapes/systems with outstanding cultural and natural values that deliver a multitude of CES. In this paper, we address the knowledge and perceptions of identified experts on the role of CES in the management of European agricultural landscapes. To achieve this goal, we developed a questionnaire on CES which was answered by experts working with various issues of European agricultural landscapes, including sustainable agriculture, landscape ecology, grassland management, nature conservation, cultural heritage conservation, environmental policy, sustainability research and rural development. The results show a wide knowledge and acceptance of the CES concept within such expert communities. Especially the aesthetic, cultural heritage, educational and recreational values were considered the most relevant CES subcategories. Interdisciplinary approaches, landscape planning and integrative science-policy approaches were perceived as the most promising methodologies to improve the CES approach for policy and management. Our results also show that according to experts the CES concept is still far from practical implementation in policies that target agricultural landscapes. In order to sustain such systems, we suggest the better implementation of inter- and transdisciplinary research for the development of CES-integrative policy and decision-making.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Cultural ecosystem services, Expert, Inter- and transdisciplinary, Landscape planning and management, Policy, Social-ecological systems
in
Land Use Policy
volume
100
article number
104900
publisher
Elsevier
external identifiers
  • scopus:85087682917
ISSN
0264-8377
DOI
10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104900
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
a2c35c94-ae0e-42c5-8843-c18a44a8fa83
date added to LUP
2020-07-21 12:50:26
date last changed
2022-04-18 23:36:22
@article{a2c35c94-ae0e-42c5-8843-c18a44a8fa83,
  abstract     = {{<p>Cultural ecosystem services (CES) are nonmaterial benefits that people obtain from ecosystems. The CES subcategories cover a wide range of domains (e.g. recreation, conservation of cultural heritage, human-nature relations). The CES concept has been proposed to acknowledge the nonmaterial values linking people and nature in social-ecological systems. Agricultural landscapes are outstanding examples of complex social-ecological systems where synergies and trade-offs between production and conservation determine the CES values. Europe is still rich in such landscapes/systems with outstanding cultural and natural values that deliver a multitude of CES. In this paper, we address the knowledge and perceptions of identified experts on the role of CES in the management of European agricultural landscapes. To achieve this goal, we developed a questionnaire on CES which was answered by experts working with various issues of European agricultural landscapes, including sustainable agriculture, landscape ecology, grassland management, nature conservation, cultural heritage conservation, environmental policy, sustainability research and rural development. The results show a wide knowledge and acceptance of the CES concept within such expert communities. Especially the aesthetic, cultural heritage, educational and recreational values were considered the most relevant CES subcategories. Interdisciplinary approaches, landscape planning and integrative science-policy approaches were perceived as the most promising methodologies to improve the CES approach for policy and management. Our results also show that according to experts the CES concept is still far from practical implementation in policies that target agricultural landscapes. In order to sustain such systems, we suggest the better implementation of inter- and transdisciplinary research for the development of CES-integrative policy and decision-making.</p>}},
  author       = {{Balázsi, Ágnes and Dänhardt, Juliana and Collins, Sue and Schweiger, Oliver and Settele, Josef and Hartel, Tibor}},
  issn         = {{0264-8377}},
  keywords     = {{Cultural ecosystem services; Expert; Inter- and transdisciplinary; Landscape planning and management; Policy; Social-ecological systems}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier}},
  series       = {{Land Use Policy}},
  title        = {{Understanding cultural ecosystem services related to farmlands : Expert survey in Europe}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104900}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104900}},
  volume       = {{100}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}