Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Birth size and cancer prognosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Sharma, Shantanu LU ; Kohli, Charu ; Johnson, Linda LU ; Bennet, Louise LU orcid ; Brusselaers, Nele and Nilsson, Peter M LU (2020) In Journal of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease 11(4). p.309-316
Abstract
There is an established link between birth parameters and risk of adult-onset cancers. The Developmental Origins of Health and Disease concept provides potential underlying mechanisms for such associations, including intrauterine exposure to endogenous hormones (androgens and estrogens), insulin-like growth factors, etc. However, there is conflicting evidence on the association between birth parameters and the cancer mortality risk. Therefore, we aimed to review and analyse the available data on the association linking birth weight and birth length with cancer mortality. Eleven studies were identified, published until April 2019. A significant association between birth weight and the prognosis of cancer (overall) was found (relative risk,... (More)
There is an established link between birth parameters and risk of adult-onset cancers. The Developmental Origins of Health and Disease concept provides potential underlying mechanisms for such associations, including intrauterine exposure to endogenous hormones (androgens and estrogens), insulin-like growth factors, etc. However, there is conflicting evidence on the association between birth parameters and the cancer mortality risk. Therefore, we aimed to review and analyse the available data on the association linking birth weight and birth length with cancer mortality. Eleven studies were identified, published until April 2019. A significant association between birth weight and the prognosis of cancer (overall) was found (relative risk, RR 1.06, 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.01, 1.11), with low heterogeneity (I2 = 27.7%). In addition, higher birth weight was associated with poorer prognosis of prostate cancer (RR 1.21, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.44). However, the association of birth weight with breast cancer mortality risk in women was not significant (RR 1.16, 95% CI: 0.93, 1.44), which might be due to high statistical heterogeneity (I2 = 67.9%). Birth length was not associated with cancer mortality risk (RR 1.0, 95% CI: 0.90–1.11). It might be inferred that birth parameters are not associated with cancer mortality as strongly as with the risk of developing cancer. Also, the association between birth parameters and cancer mortality risk is not uniform and varies according to its subtypes, and study characteristics/design. This highlights the need for further prospective studies. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
in
Journal of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease
volume
11
issue
4
pages
8 pages
publisher
Cambridge University Press
external identifiers
  • pmid:31647397
  • scopus:85074340379
ISSN
2040-1752
DOI
10.1017/S2040174419000631
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
a3745e26-a42e-4d6a-83c2-db2980dac1dd
date added to LUP
2020-02-20 12:12:37
date last changed
2024-02-16 10:59:52
@article{a3745e26-a42e-4d6a-83c2-db2980dac1dd,
  abstract     = {{There is an established link between birth parameters and risk of adult-onset cancers. The Developmental Origins of Health and Disease concept provides potential underlying mechanisms for such associations, including intrauterine exposure to endogenous hormones (androgens and estrogens), insulin-like growth factors, etc. However, there is conflicting evidence on the association between birth parameters and the cancer mortality risk. Therefore, we aimed to review and analyse the available data on the association linking birth weight and birth length with cancer mortality. Eleven studies were identified, published until April 2019. A significant association between birth weight and the prognosis of cancer (overall) was found (relative risk, RR 1.06, 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.01, 1.11), with low heterogeneity (I2 = 27.7%). In addition, higher birth weight was associated with poorer prognosis of prostate cancer (RR 1.21, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.44). However, the association of birth weight with breast cancer mortality risk in women was not significant (RR 1.16, 95% CI: 0.93, 1.44), which might be due to high statistical heterogeneity (I2 = 67.9%). Birth length was not associated with cancer mortality risk (RR 1.0, 95% CI: 0.90–1.11). It might be inferred that birth parameters are not associated with cancer mortality as strongly as with the risk of developing cancer. Also, the association between birth parameters and cancer mortality risk is not uniform and varies according to its subtypes, and study characteristics/design. This highlights the need for further prospective studies.}},
  author       = {{Sharma, Shantanu and Kohli, Charu and Johnson, Linda and Bennet, Louise and Brusselaers, Nele and Nilsson, Peter M}},
  issn         = {{2040-1752}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{309--316}},
  publisher    = {{Cambridge University Press}},
  series       = {{Journal of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease}},
  title        = {{Birth size and cancer prognosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S2040174419000631}},
  doi          = {{10.1017/S2040174419000631}},
  volume       = {{11}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}