The Bioeconomy—A New Life Cycle Phase For Swedish Forestry: Evidence from 50 Years of Significant Innovation Output
Kreutzer, Philipp Jonas LU
(2026)
In Lund Papers in Economic History
- Abstract
- This paper examines forest-based bioeconomy innovation in Sweden between 1970 and 2021 to test central claims about innovation complexity, knowledge requirements, collaboration intensity, and industrial life cycle dynamics. Using a comprehensive database of 4,972 commercialized innovations, I identify 649 forest bioeconomy innovations and analyze their characteristics through logistic regression, count statistics, and qualitative assessment of innovation biographies. The analysis reveals a structural transformation around 1990, marking a shift from component optimization (1970–1989) focused on mechanization to product expansion (1990–2021) emphasizing novel bio-based products. This transition aligns with industry life cycle rejuvenation:... (More)
- This paper examines forest-based bioeconomy innovation in Sweden between 1970 and 2021 to test central claims about innovation complexity, knowledge requirements, collaboration intensity, and industrial life cycle dynamics. Using a comprehensive database of 4,972 commercialized innovations, I identify 649 forest bioeconomy innovations and analyze their characteristics through logistic regression, count statistics, and qualitative assessment of innovation biographies. The analysis reveals a structural transformation around 1990, marking a shift from component optimization (1970–1989) focused on mechanization to product expansion (1990–2021) emphasizing novel bio-based products. This transition aligns with industry life cycle rejuvenation: established firms maintained dominance, shifting from adopting external innovations to producing them internally. Contrary to prevailing assumptions, bioeconomy innovations were associated with lower developmental complexity and narrower knowledge bases than other innovations. Public funding’s association reversed from positive pre-1990 to negative post-1990. Collaboration intensity showed no association before 1990 but became positively associated with bioeconomy innovation during the product expansion period, providing partial support for the bioeconomy literature’s emphasis on collaborative development. These findings challenge expert consensus about bioeconomy innovation requirements and demonstrate that mature resource industries can undergo competence-enhancing transitions without creative destruction. Results indicate bioeconomy policy effectiveness depends critically on recognizing life cycle stage differences rather than assuming universal innovation characteristics. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/a3d37c46-d942-44d1-bdbc-a3c3aef28e80
- author
- Kreutzer, Philipp Jonas
LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2026-03-10
- type
- Working paper/Preprint
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Industry Life Cycle, Bioeconomy, Forest Industry, Industry, Sweden, Rejuvenation, L16, L73, O31, O33, Q23
- in
- Lund Papers in Economic History
- issue
- 2026:265
- pages
- 30 pages
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- a3d37c46-d942-44d1-bdbc-a3c3aef28e80
- date added to LUP
- 2026-03-10 15:48:04
- date last changed
- 2026-03-10 15:48:04
@misc{a3d37c46-d942-44d1-bdbc-a3c3aef28e80,
abstract = {{This paper examines forest-based bioeconomy innovation in Sweden between 1970 and 2021 to test central claims about innovation complexity, knowledge requirements, collaboration intensity, and industrial life cycle dynamics. Using a comprehensive database of 4,972 commercialized innovations, I identify 649 forest bioeconomy innovations and analyze their characteristics through logistic regression, count statistics, and qualitative assessment of innovation biographies. The analysis reveals a structural transformation around 1990, marking a shift from component optimization (1970–1989) focused on mechanization to product expansion (1990–2021) emphasizing novel bio-based products. This transition aligns with industry life cycle rejuvenation: established firms maintained dominance, shifting from adopting external innovations to producing them internally. Contrary to prevailing assumptions, bioeconomy innovations were associated with lower developmental complexity and narrower knowledge bases than other innovations. Public funding’s association reversed from positive pre-1990 to negative post-1990. Collaboration intensity showed no association before 1990 but became positively associated with bioeconomy innovation during the product expansion period, providing partial support for the bioeconomy literature’s emphasis on collaborative development. These findings challenge expert consensus about bioeconomy innovation requirements and demonstrate that mature resource industries can undergo competence-enhancing transitions without creative destruction. Results indicate bioeconomy policy effectiveness depends critically on recognizing life cycle stage differences rather than assuming universal innovation characteristics.}},
author = {{Kreutzer, Philipp Jonas}},
keywords = {{Industry Life Cycle; Bioeconomy; Forest Industry; Industry; Sweden; Rejuvenation; L16; L73; O31; O33; Q23}},
language = {{eng}},
month = {{03}},
note = {{Working Paper}},
number = {{2026:265}},
series = {{Lund Papers in Economic History}},
title = {{The Bioeconomy—A New Life Cycle Phase For Swedish Forestry: Evidence from 50 Years of Significant Innovation Output}},
url = {{https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/files/244575559/LUPEH_265.pdf}},
year = {{2026}},
}