Device Performance of Emerging Photovoltaic Materials (Version 1)
(2020) In Advanced Energy Materials 11(11).- Abstract
Emerging photovoltaics (PVs) focus on a variety of applications complementing large scale electricity generation. Organic, dye-sensitized, and some perovskite solar cells are considered in building integration, greenhouses, wearable, and indoor applications, thereby motivating research on flexible, transparent, semitransparent, and multi-junction PVs. Nevertheless, it can be very time consuming to find or develop an up-to-date overview of the state-of-the-art performance for these systems and applications. Two important resources for recording research cells efficiencies are the National Renewable Energy Laboratory chart and the efficiency tables compiled biannually by Martin Green and colleagues. Both publications provide an effective... (More)
Emerging photovoltaics (PVs) focus on a variety of applications complementing large scale electricity generation. Organic, dye-sensitized, and some perovskite solar cells are considered in building integration, greenhouses, wearable, and indoor applications, thereby motivating research on flexible, transparent, semitransparent, and multi-junction PVs. Nevertheless, it can be very time consuming to find or develop an up-to-date overview of the state-of-the-art performance for these systems and applications. Two important resources for recording research cells efficiencies are the National Renewable Energy Laboratory chart and the efficiency tables compiled biannually by Martin Green and colleagues. Both publications provide an effective coverage over the established technologies, bridging research and industry. An alternative approach is proposed here summarizing the best reports in the diverse research subjects for emerging PVs. Best performance parameters are provided as a function of the photovoltaic bandgap energy for each technology and application, and are put into perspective using, e.g., the Shockley–Queisser limit. In all cases, the reported data correspond to published and/or properly described certified results, with enough details provided for prospective data reproduction. Additionally, the stability test energy yield is included as an analysis parameter among state-of-the-art emerging PVs.
(Less)
- author
- organization
- publishing date
- 2020-12
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- bandgap energy, emerging photovoltaics, flexible photovoltaics, photovoltaic device photostability, transparent and semitransparent solar cells
- in
- Advanced Energy Materials
- volume
- 11
- issue
- 11
- article number
- 2002774
- pages
- 39 pages
- publisher
- Wiley-Blackwell
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85097191710
- ISSN
- 1614-6832
- DOI
- 10.1002/aenm.202002774
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- a4d82ba3-d620-4def-9771-b92471043c8c
- date added to LUP
- 2021-01-22 16:30:42
- date last changed
- 2023-11-20 21:46:23
@article{a4d82ba3-d620-4def-9771-b92471043c8c,
abstract = {{<p>Emerging photovoltaics (PVs) focus on a variety of applications complementing large scale electricity generation. Organic, dye-sensitized, and some perovskite solar cells are considered in building integration, greenhouses, wearable, and indoor applications, thereby motivating research on flexible, transparent, semitransparent, and multi-junction PVs. Nevertheless, it can be very time consuming to find or develop an up-to-date overview of the state-of-the-art performance for these systems and applications. Two important resources for recording research cells efficiencies are the National Renewable Energy Laboratory chart and the efficiency tables compiled biannually by Martin Green and colleagues. Both publications provide an effective coverage over the established technologies, bridging research and industry. An alternative approach is proposed here summarizing the best reports in the diverse research subjects for emerging PVs. Best performance parameters are provided as a function of the photovoltaic bandgap energy for each technology and application, and are put into perspective using, e.g., the Shockley–Queisser limit. In all cases, the reported data correspond to published and/or properly described certified results, with enough details provided for prospective data reproduction. Additionally, the stability test energy yield is included as an analysis parameter among state-of-the-art emerging PVs.</p>}},
author = {{Almora, Osbel and Baran, Derya and Bazan, Guillermo C. and Berger, Christian and Cabrera, Carlos I. and Catchpole, Kylie R. and Erten-Ela, Sule and Guo, Fei and Hauch, Jens and Ho-Baillie, Anita W.Y. and Jacobsson, T. Jesper and Janssen, Rene A. J. and Kirchartz, Thomas and Kopidakis, Nikos and Li, Yongfang and Loi, Maria A. and Lunt, Richard R. and Mathew, Xavier and McGehee, Michael D. and Min, Jie and Mitzi, David B. and Nazeeruddin, Mohammad K. and Nelson, Jenny and Nogueira, Ana F. and Paetzold, Ulrich W. and Park, Nam-Gyu and Rand, Barry P. and Rau, Uwe and Snaith, Henry J. and Unger, Eva and Vaillant-Roca, Lídice and Yip, Hin-Lap and Brabec, Christoph J.}},
issn = {{1614-6832}},
keywords = {{bandgap energy; emerging photovoltaics; flexible photovoltaics; photovoltaic device photostability; transparent and semitransparent solar cells}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{11}},
publisher = {{Wiley-Blackwell}},
series = {{Advanced Energy Materials}},
title = {{Device Performance of Emerging Photovoltaic Materials (Version 1)}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202002774}},
doi = {{10.1002/aenm.202002774}},
volume = {{11}},
year = {{2020}},
}