Scientific approach and attitudes among clinically working physiotherapists in Sweden -a cross sectional survey
(2023) In Archives of Physiotherapy 13(1).- Abstract
Background: Evidence based medicine (EBM) should be an endeavor within all healthcare professions. Knowledge and understanding of science are important prerequisites of EBM. Objective: The aim was to examine and compare perspectives on science and perceived inhibiting and facilitating factors for the assimilation and implementation of scientific information among clinically working specialist- and non-specialist physiotherapists in Sweden. Methods: A cross-sectional survey study was conducted via a web-based questionnaire. Clinically active physiotherapists in Sweden were invited to participate. Attitudes and perspectives were compared between physiotherapists with completed or on-going specialist training, and non-specialists. Results:... (More)
Background: Evidence based medicine (EBM) should be an endeavor within all healthcare professions. Knowledge and understanding of science are important prerequisites of EBM. Objective: The aim was to examine and compare perspectives on science and perceived inhibiting and facilitating factors for the assimilation and implementation of scientific information among clinically working specialist- and non-specialist physiotherapists in Sweden. Methods: A cross-sectional survey study was conducted via a web-based questionnaire. Clinically active physiotherapists in Sweden were invited to participate. Attitudes and perspectives were compared between physiotherapists with completed or on-going specialist training, and non-specialists. Results: In total, 1165 physiotherapists responded to the survey (75.5%, (n = 870) women, mean age 44.8 (SD 12.1), whereof 25.5% (n = 319) with completed or ongoing specialist training). The majority of participants had a high interest in science but did not consider a general scientific approach to be applied within physiotherapy. The main perceived inhibiting factor for a clinical practice more based on scientific evidence was lack of time. Specialists had in general higher interest and ability to interpret and evaluate science, and prioritized scientific evidence to a higher extent. Conclusion: Among respondents, a scientific approach was considered valuable within physiotherapy but not considered fully applied in practice. The higher interest and perceived ability to interpret science among specialists indicates that further education and specialist training can increase both interest and understanding of science among physiotherapists.
(Less)
- author
- Eek, Frida LU ; Åsenlöf, Pernilla and Stigmar, Kjerstin LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2023-12
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Evidence based practice, Physical therapy, Physiotherapy, Science
- in
- Archives of Physiotherapy
- volume
- 13
- issue
- 1
- article number
- 20
- publisher
- Springer
- external identifiers
-
- pmid:37807048
- scopus:85173671914
- ISSN
- 2057-0082
- DOI
- 10.1186/s40945-023-00173-6
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- additional info
- Funding Information: We would like to thank the trade union The Swedish Association of Physiotherapists for the distribution of invitation to the survey to their members. We would also thank the clinicians who responded to the survey. Publisher Copyright: © 2023, Italian Society of Physiotherapy.
- id
- a78c4566-5673-470f-9de1-e66da9599b7a
- date added to LUP
- 2023-12-04 16:24:12
- date last changed
- 2024-04-17 12:39:07
@article{a78c4566-5673-470f-9de1-e66da9599b7a,
abstract = {{<p>Background: Evidence based medicine (EBM) should be an endeavor within all healthcare professions. Knowledge and understanding of science are important prerequisites of EBM. Objective: The aim was to examine and compare perspectives on science and perceived inhibiting and facilitating factors for the assimilation and implementation of scientific information among clinically working specialist- and non-specialist physiotherapists in Sweden. Methods: A cross-sectional survey study was conducted via a web-based questionnaire. Clinically active physiotherapists in Sweden were invited to participate. Attitudes and perspectives were compared between physiotherapists with completed or on-going specialist training, and non-specialists. Results: In total, 1165 physiotherapists responded to the survey (75.5%, (n = 870) women, mean age 44.8 (SD 12.1), whereof 25.5% (n = 319) with completed or ongoing specialist training). The majority of participants had a high interest in science but did not consider a general scientific approach to be applied within physiotherapy. The main perceived inhibiting factor for a clinical practice more based on scientific evidence was lack of time. Specialists had in general higher interest and ability to interpret and evaluate science, and prioritized scientific evidence to a higher extent. Conclusion: Among respondents, a scientific approach was considered valuable within physiotherapy but not considered fully applied in practice. The higher interest and perceived ability to interpret science among specialists indicates that further education and specialist training can increase both interest and understanding of science among physiotherapists.</p>}},
author = {{Eek, Frida and Åsenlöf, Pernilla and Stigmar, Kjerstin}},
issn = {{2057-0082}},
keywords = {{Evidence based practice; Physical therapy; Physiotherapy; Science}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{1}},
publisher = {{Springer}},
series = {{Archives of Physiotherapy}},
title = {{Scientific approach and attitudes among clinically working physiotherapists in Sweden -a cross sectional survey}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40945-023-00173-6}},
doi = {{10.1186/s40945-023-00173-6}},
volume = {{13}},
year = {{2023}},
}