Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Contractual Learning and The Development of Heterogeneous Contracting Capabilities

Hallberg, Niklas Lars LU (2022) 82nd Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management
Abstract
Previous research suggests that parties in contractual relationships adopt a governance structure that economizes on transaction costs, and then over time learn to govern the contractual relationships in a more efficient manner by incrementally aligning contractual terms with transaction attributes based on new experiences made in the relationship. This implies that learning to contract and the development of contracting capabilities are largely experiential and directly related to the parties’ amount of contractual experience. We argue that this model is likely to underestimate the level of heterogeneity in contracting capabilities across firms. Hence, we add to the learning to contract literature by suggesting a series of firm- and... (More)
Previous research suggests that parties in contractual relationships adopt a governance structure that economizes on transaction costs, and then over time learn to govern the contractual relationships in a more efficient manner by incrementally aligning contractual terms with transaction attributes based on new experiences made in the relationship. This implies that learning to contract and the development of contracting capabilities are largely experiential and directly related to the parties’ amount of contractual experience. We argue that this model is likely to underestimate the level of heterogeneity in contracting capabilities across firms. Hence, we add to the learning to contract literature by suggesting a series of firm- and industry level moderators of the relationship between contractual experience and the development of contracting capabilities. We specifically highlight the role of organizational specialization and integration as factors likely to increase heterogeneity across firms. Because firms with heterogeneous contracting capabilities are subject to differential incentives, a counterintuitive implication of the argument is that strong contractual learning dynamics may in fact lead to reduced incentive alignment and intensified contractual hazards. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to conference
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Learning to contract, contacting capabilities, transaction cost economics
conference name
82nd Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management
conference location
Seattle, United States
conference dates
2022-08-05 - 2022-08-09
DOI
10.5465/AMBPP.2022.16257abstract
language
English
LU publication?
yes
additional info
Research financed by grant 2018-01474 Swedish Research Council/Vetenskapsrådet.
id
a7bc4108-8554-40a7-867d-57d895d7288d
date added to LUP
2022-08-22 10:43:50
date last changed
2024-03-13 15:04:09
@misc{a7bc4108-8554-40a7-867d-57d895d7288d,
  abstract     = {{Previous research suggests that parties in contractual relationships adopt a governance structure that economizes on transaction costs, and then over time learn to govern the contractual relationships in a more efficient manner by incrementally aligning contractual terms with transaction attributes based on new experiences made in the relationship. This implies that learning to contract and the development of contracting capabilities are largely experiential and directly related to the parties’ amount of contractual experience. We argue that this model is likely to underestimate the level of heterogeneity in contracting capabilities across firms. Hence, we add to the learning to contract literature by suggesting a series of firm- and industry level moderators of the relationship between contractual experience and the development of contracting capabilities. We specifically highlight the role of organizational specialization and integration as factors likely to increase heterogeneity across firms. Because firms with heterogeneous contracting capabilities are subject to differential incentives, a counterintuitive implication of the argument is that strong contractual learning dynamics may in fact lead to reduced incentive alignment and intensified contractual hazards.}},
  author       = {{Hallberg, Niklas Lars}},
  keywords     = {{Learning to contract; contacting capabilities; transaction cost economics}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  title        = {{Contractual Learning and The Development of Heterogeneous Contracting Capabilities}},
  url          = {{https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/files/173694054/AOM2022_.pdf}},
  doi          = {{10.5465/AMBPP.2022.16257abstract}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}