Evaluating biogeophysical sensitivities to idealized deforestation in CMIP6 models using observational constraints
Mileva, Nikolina ; Pongratz, Julia ; Arora, Vivek K. ; Ito, Akihiko ; Luyssaert, Sebastiaan ; McDermid, Sonali S. ; Miller, Paul A. LU
; Peano, Daniele
; Séférian, Roland
and Zhang, Yanwu
, et al.
(2025)
In Earth System Dynamics
16(6).
p.2137-2160
- Abstract
Forests are an important component in the framework of nature-based solutions for mitigating climate change. However, there are still uncertainties about the biogeophysical effects of forest cover changes affecting heat and water fluxes as captured by Earth System Models (ESMs) simulations and observations. In this study, we investigate the differences in the surface temperature response to idealized, complete deforestation and the temperature sensitivity to percentage change in forest cover in ESMs and observations. In this comparison, the separation between local (at the place of deforestation) and non-local (nearby or distant locations) effects is crucial as observations capture only the former. Here, we propose a modified... (More)
Forests are an important component in the framework of nature-based solutions for mitigating climate change. However, there are still uncertainties about the biogeophysical effects of forest cover changes affecting heat and water fluxes as captured by Earth System Models (ESMs) simulations and observations. In this study, we investigate the differences in the surface temperature response to idealized, complete deforestation and the temperature sensitivity to percentage change in forest cover in ESMs and observations. In this comparison, the separation between local (at the place of deforestation) and non-local (nearby or distant locations) effects is crucial as observations capture only the former. Here, we propose a modified methodology to separate local and non-local effects in climate models suitable for simulations with linear rate of deforestation. The local sensitivity of a climate variable per unit deforested area is represented by the slope of the linear regression, where tree cover is an explanatory variable. The non-local effect is defined as the difference between the overall change in the respective climate variable and the local effect. Our analysis of eleven ESMs of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) that participated in the idealized global deforestation experiment deforest-glob, reveals a coherent local temperature response among climate models characterized by warming in the tropics and cooling in the northern higher latitudes. The temperature response however varies in magnitude, space and time with ESMs showing distinctive seasonal and spatial patterns. A closer look at the albedo response to deforestation across northern latitudes shows an overestimation in the ESMs in comparison to observations that translates via an emergent constraint (i.e. resulting from the linear relationships between local albedo and surface temperature within the model ensemble) into an overestimation of the overall simulated cooling effect. The overestimation of the local albedo sensitivity cannot be explained solely by the higher percentage of snow cover in ESMs. In terms of local latent heat flux sensitivity, the ESMs ensemble mean is overestimated for the boreal region, but it is in good agreement with the observational constraint in the temperate forests and the tropics. However, the inter-model spread and the internal model variation in these regions are considerable. ESMs having higher local albedo and latent heat flux sensitivities than the current observational constraints can still exhibit a realistic temperature response due to compensatory effects between the two sensitivities. Non-local effects contribute to consistent cooling throughout the globe, which persists also during the summer when the influence of the overestimated albedo sensitivity over snow is weaker. Having a deeper understanding of how local and non-local biogeophysical effects are represented in ESMs can give us insights into the net climate impact of deforestation and help us improve next generation ESMs.
(Less)
- author
- Mileva, Nikolina
; Pongratz, Julia
; Arora, Vivek K.
; Ito, Akihiko
; Luyssaert, Sebastiaan
; McDermid, Sonali S.
; Miller, Paul A.
LU
; Peano, Daniele
; Séférian, Roland
and Zhang, Yanwu
, et al. (More)
- Mileva, Nikolina
; Pongratz, Julia
; Arora, Vivek K.
; Ito, Akihiko
; Luyssaert, Sebastiaan
; McDermid, Sonali S.
; Miller, Paul A.
LU
; Peano, Daniele
; Séférian, Roland
; Zhang, Yanwu
and Buermann, Wolfgang
(Less)
- organization
- publishing date
- 2025-11-21
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- Earth System Dynamics
- volume
- 16
- issue
- 6
- pages
- 24 pages
- publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:105022725938
- ISSN
- 2190-4979
- DOI
- 10.5194/esd-16-2137-2025
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- additional info
- Publisher Copyright: © Copyright:
- id
- a84f47c1-8f54-46a4-b760-a620be88beac
- date added to LUP
- 2026-01-22 09:40:49
- date last changed
- 2026-01-22 13:55:13
@article{a84f47c1-8f54-46a4-b760-a620be88beac,
abstract = {{<p>Forests are an important component in the framework of nature-based solutions for mitigating climate change. However, there are still uncertainties about the biogeophysical effects of forest cover changes affecting heat and water fluxes as captured by Earth System Models (ESMs) simulations and observations. In this study, we investigate the differences in the surface temperature response to idealized, complete deforestation and the temperature sensitivity to percentage change in forest cover in ESMs and observations. In this comparison, the separation between local (at the place of deforestation) and non-local (nearby or distant locations) effects is crucial as observations capture only the former. Here, we propose a modified methodology to separate local and non-local effects in climate models suitable for simulations with linear rate of deforestation. The local sensitivity of a climate variable per unit deforested area is represented by the slope of the linear regression, where tree cover is an explanatory variable. The non-local effect is defined as the difference between the overall change in the respective climate variable and the local effect. Our analysis of eleven ESMs of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) that participated in the idealized global deforestation experiment deforest-glob, reveals a coherent local temperature response among climate models characterized by warming in the tropics and cooling in the northern higher latitudes. The temperature response however varies in magnitude, space and time with ESMs showing distinctive seasonal and spatial patterns. A closer look at the albedo response to deforestation across northern latitudes shows an overestimation in the ESMs in comparison to observations that translates via an emergent constraint (i.e. resulting from the linear relationships between local albedo and surface temperature within the model ensemble) into an overestimation of the overall simulated cooling effect. The overestimation of the local albedo sensitivity cannot be explained solely by the higher percentage of snow cover in ESMs. In terms of local latent heat flux sensitivity, the ESMs ensemble mean is overestimated for the boreal region, but it is in good agreement with the observational constraint in the temperate forests and the tropics. However, the inter-model spread and the internal model variation in these regions are considerable. ESMs having higher local albedo and latent heat flux sensitivities than the current observational constraints can still exhibit a realistic temperature response due to compensatory effects between the two sensitivities. Non-local effects contribute to consistent cooling throughout the globe, which persists also during the summer when the influence of the overestimated albedo sensitivity over snow is weaker. Having a deeper understanding of how local and non-local biogeophysical effects are represented in ESMs can give us insights into the net climate impact of deforestation and help us improve next generation ESMs.</p>}},
author = {{Mileva, Nikolina and Pongratz, Julia and Arora, Vivek K. and Ito, Akihiko and Luyssaert, Sebastiaan and McDermid, Sonali S. and Miller, Paul A. and Peano, Daniele and Séférian, Roland and Zhang, Yanwu and Buermann, Wolfgang}},
issn = {{2190-4979}},
language = {{eng}},
month = {{11}},
number = {{6}},
pages = {{2137--2160}},
publisher = {{Copernicus GmbH}},
series = {{Earth System Dynamics}},
title = {{Evaluating biogeophysical sensitivities to idealized deforestation in CMIP6 models using observational constraints}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-2137-2025}},
doi = {{10.5194/esd-16-2137-2025}},
volume = {{16}},
year = {{2025}},
}