Smoking Cessation Programs Are Less Effective in Smokers with Low Socioeconomic Status Even When Financial Incentives for Quitting Smoking Are Offered-A Community-Randomized Smoking Cessation Trial in Denmark
Pisinger, Charlotta ; Toxværd, Cecilie Goltermann and Rasmussen, Mette LU
(2022)
In International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
19(17).
p.1-15
- Abstract
Financial incentives offered to those who quit smoking have been found effective, also in persons with low socioeconomic status (SES), but no previous study has investigated who benefits most: smokers with low or high SES. In this community-randomized trial ("Richer without smoking"), three Danish municipalities were randomized to reward persons who were abstinent when attending the municipal smoking cessation program (FIMs) and three municipalities were randomized to spend the same amount on smoking cessation campaigns recruiting smokers to the smoking cessation program (CAMs). The municipalities each received approximately USD 16,000. An intention-to-treat approach was used in analyses. In regression analyses adjusted for individual-... (More)
Financial incentives offered to those who quit smoking have been found effective, also in persons with low socioeconomic status (SES), but no previous study has investigated who benefits most: smokers with low or high SES. In this community-randomized trial ("Richer without smoking"), three Danish municipalities were randomized to reward persons who were abstinent when attending the municipal smoking cessation program (FIMs) and three municipalities were randomized to spend the same amount on smoking cessation campaigns recruiting smokers to the smoking cessation program (CAMs). The municipalities each received approximately USD 16,000. An intention-to-treat approach was used in analyses. In regression analyses adjusted for individual- and municipal-level differences, we found that smokers with high SES living in FIMs had significantly higher proportion of validated long-term successful quitters (OR (95% CI): 2.59 (1.6-4.2)) than high-SES smokers living in CAM. Smokers with low SES, however, did not experience the same benefit of financial incentives as smokers with high SES. Neither the FIMs nor the CAMs succeeded in attracting more smokers with low SES during the intervention year 2018 than the year before. Our study showed that smokers with low SES did not experience the same benefit of financial incentives as smokers with high SES.
(Less)
- author
- Pisinger, Charlotta
; Toxværd, Cecilie Goltermann
and Rasmussen, Mette
LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2022-08-31
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- volume
- 19
- issue
- 17
- article number
- 10879
- pages
- 1 - 15
- publisher
- MDPI AG
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85137601718
- pmid:36078595
- ISSN
- 1660-4601
- DOI
- 10.3390/ijerph191710879
- project
- Financial incentives versus health campaigns to quit smoking
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- ad998699-a256-43e3-a399-51b70b6fc726
- date added to LUP
- 2022-09-13 10:44:19
- date last changed
- 2024-07-23 11:14:21
@article{ad998699-a256-43e3-a399-51b70b6fc726,
abstract = {{<p>Financial incentives offered to those who quit smoking have been found effective, also in persons with low socioeconomic status (SES), but no previous study has investigated who benefits most: smokers with low or high SES. In this community-randomized trial ("Richer without smoking"), three Danish municipalities were randomized to reward persons who were abstinent when attending the municipal smoking cessation program (FIMs) and three municipalities were randomized to spend the same amount on smoking cessation campaigns recruiting smokers to the smoking cessation program (CAMs). The municipalities each received approximately USD 16,000. An intention-to-treat approach was used in analyses. In regression analyses adjusted for individual- and municipal-level differences, we found that smokers with high SES living in FIMs had significantly higher proportion of validated long-term successful quitters (OR (95% CI): 2.59 (1.6-4.2)) than high-SES smokers living in CAM. Smokers with low SES, however, did not experience the same benefit of financial incentives as smokers with high SES. Neither the FIMs nor the CAMs succeeded in attracting more smokers with low SES during the intervention year 2018 than the year before. Our study showed that smokers with low SES did not experience the same benefit of financial incentives as smokers with high SES.</p>}},
author = {{Pisinger, Charlotta and Toxværd, Cecilie Goltermann and Rasmussen, Mette}},
issn = {{1660-4601}},
language = {{eng}},
month = {{08}},
number = {{17}},
pages = {{1--15}},
publisher = {{MDPI AG}},
series = {{International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health}},
title = {{Smoking Cessation Programs Are Less Effective in Smokers with Low Socioeconomic Status Even When Financial Incentives for Quitting Smoking Are Offered-A Community-Randomized Smoking Cessation Trial in Denmark}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710879}},
doi = {{10.3390/ijerph191710879}},
volume = {{19}},
year = {{2022}},
}