Advanced

The interdisciplinary decision problem : Popperian optimism and Kuhnian pessimism in forestry

Persson, Johannes LU ; Thorén, Henrik LU and Olsson, Lennart LU (2018) In Ecology and Society 23(3).
Abstract (Swedish)
Interdisciplinary research in the fields of forestry and sustainability studies often encounters seemingly incompatible ontological assumptions deriving from natural and social sciences. The perceived incompatibilities might emerge from the epistemological and ontological claims of the theories or models directly employed in the interdisciplinary collaboration; or they might be created by other epistemological and ontological assumptions that these interdisciplinary researchers find no reason to question. In this paper we discuss the benefits and risks of two possible approaches - Popperian optimism and Kuhnian pessimism - to interdisciplinary knowledge integration where epistemological and ontological differences between the sciences... (More)
Interdisciplinary research in the fields of forestry and sustainability studies often encounters seemingly incompatible ontological assumptions deriving from natural and social sciences. The perceived incompatibilities might emerge from the epistemological and ontological claims of the theories or models directly employed in the interdisciplinary collaboration; or they might be created by other epistemological and ontological assumptions that these interdisciplinary researchers find no reason to question. In this paper we discuss the benefits and risks of two possible approaches - Popperian optimism and Kuhnian pessimism - to interdisciplinary knowledge integration where epistemological and ontological differences between the sciences involved can be expected. (Less)
Abstract
Interdisciplinary research in the fields of forestry and sustainability studies often encounters seemingly incompatible ontological assumptions deriving from natural and social sciences. The perceived incompatibilities might emerge from the epistemological and ontological claims of the theories or models directly employed in the interdisciplinary collaboration, or they might be created by other epistemological and ontological assumptions that these interdisciplinary researchers find no reason to question. In this paper we discuss the benefits and risks of two possible approaches, Popperian optimism and Kuhnian pessimism, to interdisciplinary knowledge integration where epistemological and ontological differences between the sciences... (More)
Interdisciplinary research in the fields of forestry and sustainability studies often encounters seemingly incompatible ontological assumptions deriving from natural and social sciences. The perceived incompatibilities might emerge from the epistemological and ontological claims of the theories or models directly employed in the interdisciplinary collaboration, or they might be created by other epistemological and ontological assumptions that these interdisciplinary researchers find no reason to question. In this paper we discuss the benefits and risks of two possible approaches, Popperian optimism and Kuhnian pessimism, to interdisciplinary knowledge integration where epistemological and ontological differences between the sciences involved can be expected. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
sustainability, forestry, silviculture, ontology, philosophy of interdisciplinarity, interdisciplinary integration, forestry, interdisciplinary integration, ontology, philosophy of interdisciplinarity, silviculture, sustainability issues
in
Ecology and Society
volume
23
issue
3
pages
9 pages
publisher
The Resilience Alliance
external identifiers
  • scopus:85056722430
ISSN
1708-3087
DOI
10.5751/ES-10401-230340
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
b0630fff-b3a7-432c-a099-a97dc9011d55
date added to LUP
2018-08-04 22:15:18
date last changed
2019-02-20 11:23:43
@article{b0630fff-b3a7-432c-a099-a97dc9011d55,
  abstract     = {Interdisciplinary research in the fields of forestry and sustainability studies often encounters seemingly incompatible ontological assumptions deriving from natural and social sciences. The perceived incompatibilities might emerge from the epistemological and ontological claims of the theories or models directly employed in the interdisciplinary collaboration, or they might be created by other epistemological and ontological assumptions that these interdisciplinary researchers find no reason to question. In this paper we discuss the benefits and risks of two possible approaches, Popperian optimism and Kuhnian pessimism, to interdisciplinary knowledge integration where epistemological and ontological differences between the sciences involved can be expected.},
  articleno    = {40},
  author       = {Persson, Johannes and Thorén, Henrik and Olsson, Lennart},
  issn         = {1708-3087},
  keyword      = {sustainability,forestry,silviculture,ontology,philosophy of interdisciplinarity,interdisciplinary integration,forestry,interdisciplinary integration,ontology,philosophy of interdisciplinarity,silviculture,sustainability issues},
  language     = {eng},
  month        = {09},
  number       = {3},
  pages        = {9},
  publisher    = {The Resilience Alliance},
  series       = {Ecology and Society},
  title        = {The interdisciplinary decision problem : Popperian optimism and Kuhnian pessimism in forestry},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-10401-230340},
  volume       = {23},
  year         = {2018},
}