Towards clean material cycles: Is there a policy conflict between circular economy and non-toxic environment?
(2020) In Waste Management & Research 38(7). p.705-707- Abstract
- Lately, the idea of ‘non-toxic’ (or ‘clean’) material cycles has become increasingly popular as a starting point for the consideration of circular economy strategies among leading regulating actors, such as the European Commission (2017). However, it should be apparent that, by default, circular economy aspirations awaken a potential policy conflict between increased circulation of resources and reduction of exposure to hazardous substances (human- and eco-toxic substances of concern). Here, we build upon the great tradition of Waste Management & Research editorials on the topic debated, and not least on the recent opinion piece by Stanisavljevic and Brunner (2019). We argue that non-toxic material cycles are indeed a desirable vision,... (More)
- Lately, the idea of ‘non-toxic’ (or ‘clean’) material cycles has become increasingly popular as a starting point for the consideration of circular economy strategies among leading regulating actors, such as the European Commission (2017). However, it should be apparent that, by default, circular economy aspirations awaken a potential policy conflict between increased circulation of resources and reduction of exposure to hazardous substances (human- and eco-toxic substances of concern). Here, we build upon the great tradition of Waste Management & Research editorials on the topic debated, and not least on the recent opinion piece by Stanisavljevic and Brunner (2019). We argue that non-toxic material cycles are indeed a desirable vision, but that they will not come naturally in a world of circulated material resources – at least not without major supply chain disruptions and persistent conscious efforts. Let us elaborate. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/b814e94c-8838-44cc-b9f4-b340c9d32df3
- author
- Johansson, Nils ; Velis, Costas and Corvellec, Hervé LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2020-07-01
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Waste, Circular Economy
- in
- Waste Management & Research
- volume
- 38
- issue
- 7
- pages
- 3 pages
- publisher
- SAGE Publications
- external identifiers
-
- pmid:32627717
- scopus:85087473721
- ISSN
- 0734-242X
- DOI
- 10.1177/0734242X20934251
- project
- Relations in Circular Business Models
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- b814e94c-8838-44cc-b9f4-b340c9d32df3
- date added to LUP
- 2020-07-08 05:57:03
- date last changed
- 2022-12-23 23:33:15
@article{b814e94c-8838-44cc-b9f4-b340c9d32df3, abstract = {{Lately, the idea of ‘non-toxic’ (or ‘clean’) material cycles has become increasingly popular as a starting point for the consideration of circular economy strategies among leading regulating actors, such as the European Commission (2017). However, it should be apparent that, by default, circular economy aspirations awaken a potential policy conflict between increased circulation of resources and reduction of exposure to hazardous substances (human- and eco-toxic substances of concern). Here, we build upon the great tradition of Waste Management & Research editorials on the topic debated, and not least on the recent opinion piece by Stanisavljevic and Brunner (2019). We argue that non-toxic material cycles are indeed a desirable vision, but that they will not come naturally in a world of circulated material resources – at least not without major supply chain disruptions and persistent conscious efforts. Let us elaborate.}}, author = {{Johansson, Nils and Velis, Costas and Corvellec, Hervé}}, issn = {{0734-242X}}, keywords = {{Waste; Circular Economy}}, language = {{eng}}, month = {{07}}, number = {{7}}, pages = {{705--707}}, publisher = {{SAGE Publications}}, series = {{Waste Management & Research}}, title = {{Towards clean material cycles: Is there a policy conflict between circular economy and non-toxic environment?}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0734242X20934251}}, doi = {{10.1177/0734242X20934251}}, volume = {{38}}, year = {{2020}}, }