Conceptual spaces and the strength of similarity-based arguments
(2022) In Cognition 218.- Abstract
Central to the conceptual spaces framework is the thought that concepts can be studied mathematically, by geometrical and topological means. Various applications of the framework have already been subjected to empirical testing, mostly with excellent results, demonstrating the framework's usefulness. So far untested is the suggestion that conceptual spaces may help explain certain inferences people are willing to make. The experiment reported in this paper focused on similarity-based arguments, testing the hypothesis that the strength of such arguments can be predicted from the structure of the conceptual space in which the items being reasoned about are represented. A secondary aim of the experiment concerned a recent inferentialist... (More)
Central to the conceptual spaces framework is the thought that concepts can be studied mathematically, by geometrical and topological means. Various applications of the framework have already been subjected to empirical testing, mostly with excellent results, demonstrating the framework's usefulness. So far untested is the suggestion that conceptual spaces may help explain certain inferences people are willing to make. The experiment reported in this paper focused on similarity-based arguments, testing the hypothesis that the strength of such arguments can be predicted from the structure of the conceptual space in which the items being reasoned about are represented. A secondary aim of the experiment concerned a recent inferentialist semantics for indicative conditionals, according to which the truth of a conditional requires the presence of a sufficiently strong inferential connection between its antecedent and consequent. To the extent that the strength of similarity-based inferences can be predicted from the geometry and topology of the relevant conceptual space, such spaces should help predict truth ratings of conditionals embodying a similarity-based inferential link. The results supported both hypotheses.
(Less)
- author
- Douven, Igor ; Elqayam, Shira ; Gärdenfors, Peter LU and Mirabile, Patricia
- organization
- publishing date
- 2022
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Argument strength, Concepts, Conceptual spaces, Conditionals, Inference, Inferentialism, Similarity
- in
- Cognition
- volume
- 218
- article number
- 104951
- publisher
- Elsevier
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85119365687
- pmid:34801861
- ISSN
- 0010-0277
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104951
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- additional info
- Publisher Copyright: © 2021 Elsevier B.V.
- id
- bbcb5672-710b-4214-b969-13151d7a50d8
- date added to LUP
- 2021-12-02 14:25:52
- date last changed
- 2024-06-15 21:59:06
@article{bbcb5672-710b-4214-b969-13151d7a50d8,
abstract = {{<p>Central to the conceptual spaces framework is the thought that concepts can be studied mathematically, by geometrical and topological means. Various applications of the framework have already been subjected to empirical testing, mostly with excellent results, demonstrating the framework's usefulness. So far untested is the suggestion that conceptual spaces may help explain certain inferences people are willing to make. The experiment reported in this paper focused on similarity-based arguments, testing the hypothesis that the strength of such arguments can be predicted from the structure of the conceptual space in which the items being reasoned about are represented. A secondary aim of the experiment concerned a recent inferentialist semantics for indicative conditionals, according to which the truth of a conditional requires the presence of a sufficiently strong inferential connection between its antecedent and consequent. To the extent that the strength of similarity-based inferences can be predicted from the geometry and topology of the relevant conceptual space, such spaces should help predict truth ratings of conditionals embodying a similarity-based inferential link. The results supported both hypotheses.</p>}},
author = {{Douven, Igor and Elqayam, Shira and Gärdenfors, Peter and Mirabile, Patricia}},
issn = {{0010-0277}},
keywords = {{Argument strength; Concepts; Conceptual spaces; Conditionals; Inference; Inferentialism; Similarity}},
language = {{eng}},
publisher = {{Elsevier}},
series = {{Cognition}},
title = {{Conceptual spaces and the strength of similarity-based arguments}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104951}},
doi = {{10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104951}},
volume = {{218}},
year = {{2022}},
}