Social life cycle assessment of adaptive reuse
(2023) In Buildings and Cities 4(1). p.334-351- Abstract
- Adaptive reuse of existing buildings and shared spaces has been highlighted as a key circular economy concept in the built environment, with the former also having been found to increase social sustainability through the preservation of cultural heritage. However, circular economy research has focused on the economic and environmental dimensions, with the social dimension receiving less attention. The aim of this study is, therefore, to establish the social impact of an adaptive reuse case with shared spaces. A supplementary aim is to test and adapt the general social life cycle assessment (S-LCA) framework to fit the built environment context. A qualitative single case study method is used. The study finds significant positive social... (More)
- Adaptive reuse of existing buildings and shared spaces has been highlighted as a key circular economy concept in the built environment, with the former also having been found to increase social sustainability through the preservation of cultural heritage. However, circular economy research has focused on the economic and environmental dimensions, with the social dimension receiving less attention. The aim of this study is, therefore, to establish the social impact of an adaptive reuse case with shared spaces. A supplementary aim is to test and adapt the general social life cycle assessment (S-LCA) framework to fit the built environment context. A qualitative single case study method is used. The study finds significant positive social impacts from the adaptive reuse case, mainly in the form of economic and cultural impact on the local community. The S-LCA framework was a useful tool in assessing the social impact of the case. Additional indicators of particular relevance to the built environment are identified relating to the end-users and local community, as well as indicators relating to society, value chain actors, and workers.
Practice relevance
A set of sector-specific indicators is created to capture the social impact. The findings are useful for researchers and industry professionals intending to evaluate and increase the social sustainability of a construction or demolition project. The improved S-LCA framework and set of indicators allows for an improved understanding of built environment implications. Planners, designers, and clients can employ the revised framework to evaluate projects pre- and post-construction or demolition. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/bbe9e1bc-ac62-42c6-a739-dc9f6da86813
- author
- Lundgren, Rebecka LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2023-06-16
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- Buildings and Cities
- volume
- 4
- issue
- 1
- pages
- 334 - 351
- publisher
- Web Portal Ubiquity Press
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85163690086
- ISSN
- 2632-6655
- DOI
- 10.5334/bc.314
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- bbe9e1bc-ac62-42c6-a739-dc9f6da86813
- date added to LUP
- 2023-08-07 10:35:05
- date last changed
- 2023-09-26 14:52:15
@article{bbe9e1bc-ac62-42c6-a739-dc9f6da86813,
abstract = {{Adaptive reuse of existing buildings and shared spaces has been highlighted as a key circular economy concept in the built environment, with the former also having been found to increase social sustainability through the preservation of cultural heritage. However, circular economy research has focused on the economic and environmental dimensions, with the social dimension receiving less attention. The aim of this study is, therefore, to establish the social impact of an adaptive reuse case with shared spaces. A supplementary aim is to test and adapt the general social life cycle assessment (S-LCA) framework to fit the built environment context. A qualitative single case study method is used. The study finds significant positive social impacts from the adaptive reuse case, mainly in the form of economic and cultural impact on the local community. The S-LCA framework was a useful tool in assessing the social impact of the case. Additional indicators of particular relevance to the built environment are identified relating to the end-users and local community, as well as indicators relating to society, value chain actors, and workers.<br/><br/>Practice relevance<br/><br/>A set of sector-specific indicators is created to capture the social impact. The findings are useful for researchers and industry professionals intending to evaluate and increase the social sustainability of a construction or demolition project. The improved S-LCA framework and set of indicators allows for an improved understanding of built environment implications. Planners, designers, and clients can employ the revised framework to evaluate projects pre- and post-construction or demolition.}},
author = {{Lundgren, Rebecka}},
issn = {{2632-6655}},
language = {{eng}},
month = {{06}},
number = {{1}},
pages = {{334--351}},
publisher = {{Web Portal Ubiquity Press}},
series = {{Buildings and Cities}},
title = {{Social life cycle assessment of adaptive reuse}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/bc.314}},
doi = {{10.5334/bc.314}},
volume = {{4}},
year = {{2023}},
}