Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Tumour deposits in colon cancer predict recurrence and reduced survival in a nationwide population-based study

Jörgren, Fredrik LU ; Agger, Erik LU orcid ; Lydrup, Marie-Louise LU and Buchwald, Pamela LU (2023) In BJS Open 7(6).
Abstract
Background: Tumour deposits are suggested to impact prognosis in colon cancer negatively. This study assessed the impact of tumour deposits on oncological outcomes.

Methods: Data from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry for patients who underwent R0 abdominal surgery for TNM stage I-III colon cancer between 2011 and 2014 with 5-year follow-up were analysed with multivariable analysis. Patients were categorized for their tumour deposit status and compared for the local recurrence and distant metastasis rates and 5-year survivals (overall and relative). Subgroup analyses were performed according to the nodal disease status.

Results: Of 8146 stage I-III colon cancer patients who underwent R0 resection, 8014 patients were... (More)
Background: Tumour deposits are suggested to impact prognosis in colon cancer negatively. This study assessed the impact of tumour deposits on oncological outcomes.

Methods: Data from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry for patients who underwent R0 abdominal surgery for TNM stage I-III colon cancer between 2011 and 2014 with 5-year follow-up were analysed with multivariable analysis. Patients were categorized for their tumour deposit status and compared for the local recurrence and distant metastasis rates and 5-year survivals (overall and relative). Subgroup analyses were performed according to the nodal disease status.

Results: Of 8146 stage I-III colon cancer patients who underwent R0 resection, 8014 patients were analysed (808 tumour deposits positive, 7206 tumour deposits negative). Patients with tumour deposits positive tumours had increased local recurrence and distant metastasis rates (7.2 versus 3.0 per cent; P < 0.001 and 33.9 versus 12.0 per cent; P < 0.001 respectively) and reduced 5-year overall and relative survival (56.8 per cent versus 74.9 per cent; P < 0.001 and 68.5 versus 92.6 per cent; P < 0.001 respectively). In multivariable analysis, tumour deposits moderately increased the risks of local recurrence and distant metastasis (hazard ratio 1.50, 95 per cent c.i. 1.09 to 2.07; P = 0.013 and HR 1.91, 95 per cent c.i. 1.64 to 2.23; P < 0.001 respectively) and worse 5-year overall and relative survival (hazard ratio 1.60, 95 per cent c.i. 1.40 to 1.82; P < 0.001 and excess hazard ratio 2.24, 95 per cent c.i. 1.81 to 2.78; P < 0.001 respectively). Subgroup analysis of N stages found that N1c patients had worse outcomes than N0 for distant metastasis and relative survival. For patients with lymph node metastases tumour deposits increased the risks of distant metastasis and worse overall and relative survival, except for N2b patients.

Conclusion: Tumour deposits negatively impact the prognosis in colon cancer and must be considered when discussing adjuvant chemotherapy. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
in
BJS Open
volume
7
issue
6
article number
zrad122
publisher
Wiley
external identifiers
  • pmid:38035752
  • scopus:85178519280
ISSN
2474-9842
DOI
10.1093/bjsopen/zrad122
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
bc289d55-307b-4e96-9269-0b070ecbc3b4
date added to LUP
2023-12-02 11:11:12
date last changed
2024-01-02 04:02:55
@article{bc289d55-307b-4e96-9269-0b070ecbc3b4,
  abstract     = {{Background: Tumour deposits are suggested to impact prognosis in colon cancer negatively. This study assessed the impact of tumour deposits on oncological outcomes.<br/><br/>Methods: Data from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry for patients who underwent R0 abdominal surgery for TNM stage I-III colon cancer between 2011 and 2014 with 5-year follow-up were analysed with multivariable analysis. Patients were categorized for their tumour deposit status and compared for the local recurrence and distant metastasis rates and 5-year survivals (overall and relative). Subgroup analyses were performed according to the nodal disease status.<br/><br/>Results: Of 8146 stage I-III colon cancer patients who underwent R0 resection, 8014 patients were analysed (808 tumour deposits positive, 7206 tumour deposits negative). Patients with tumour deposits positive tumours had increased local recurrence and distant metastasis rates (7.2 versus 3.0 per cent; P &lt; 0.001 and 33.9 versus 12.0 per cent; P &lt; 0.001 respectively) and reduced 5-year overall and relative survival (56.8 per cent versus 74.9 per cent; P &lt; 0.001 and 68.5 versus 92.6 per cent; P &lt; 0.001 respectively). In multivariable analysis, tumour deposits moderately increased the risks of local recurrence and distant metastasis (hazard ratio 1.50, 95 per cent c.i. 1.09 to 2.07; P = 0.013 and HR 1.91, 95 per cent c.i. 1.64 to 2.23; P &lt; 0.001 respectively) and worse 5-year overall and relative survival (hazard ratio 1.60, 95 per cent c.i. 1.40 to 1.82; P &lt; 0.001 and excess hazard ratio 2.24, 95 per cent c.i. 1.81 to 2.78; P &lt; 0.001 respectively). Subgroup analysis of N stages found that N1c patients had worse outcomes than N0 for distant metastasis and relative survival. For patients with lymph node metastases tumour deposits increased the risks of distant metastasis and worse overall and relative survival, except for N2b patients.<br/><br/>Conclusion: Tumour deposits negatively impact the prognosis in colon cancer and must be considered when discussing adjuvant chemotherapy.}},
  author       = {{Jörgren, Fredrik and Agger, Erik and Lydrup, Marie-Louise and Buchwald, Pamela}},
  issn         = {{2474-9842}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  month        = {{11}},
  number       = {{6}},
  publisher    = {{Wiley}},
  series       = {{BJS Open}},
  title        = {{Tumour deposits in colon cancer predict recurrence and reduced survival in a nationwide population-based study}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrad122}},
  doi          = {{10.1093/bjsopen/zrad122}},
  volume       = {{7}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}