Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Advances in Type 1 Diabetes Prediction Using Islet Autoantibodies : Beyond a Simple Count

So, Michelle ; Speake, Cate ; Steck, Andrea K. ; Lundgren, Markus LU ; Colman, Peter G. ; Palmer, Jerry P. ; Herold, Kevan C. and Greenbaum, Carla J. (2021) In Endocrine Reviews 42(5). p.584-604
Abstract

Islet autoantibodies are key markers for the diagnosis of type 1 diabetes. Since their discovery, they have also been recognized for their potential to identify at-risk individuals prior to symptoms. To date, risk prediction using autoantibodies has been based on autoantibody number; it has been robustly shown that nearly all multiple-autoantibody-positive individuals will progress to clinical disease. However, longitudinal studies have demonstrated that the rate of progression among multiple-autoantibody-positive individuals is highly heterogenous. Accurate prediction of the most rapidly progressing individuals is crucial for efficient and informative clinical trials and for identification of candidates most likely to benefit from... (More)

Islet autoantibodies are key markers for the diagnosis of type 1 diabetes. Since their discovery, they have also been recognized for their potential to identify at-risk individuals prior to symptoms. To date, risk prediction using autoantibodies has been based on autoantibody number; it has been robustly shown that nearly all multiple-autoantibody-positive individuals will progress to clinical disease. However, longitudinal studies have demonstrated that the rate of progression among multiple-autoantibody-positive individuals is highly heterogenous. Accurate prediction of the most rapidly progressing individuals is crucial for efficient and informative clinical trials and for identification of candidates most likely to benefit from disease modification. This is increasingly relevant with the recent success in delaying clinical disease in presymptomatic subjects using immunotherapy, and as the field moves toward population-based screening. There have been many studies investigating islet autoantibody characteristics for their predictive potential, beyond a simple categorical count. Predictive features that have emerged include molecular specifics, such as epitope targets and affinity; longitudinal patterns, such as changes in titer and autoantibody reversion; and sequence-dependent risk profiles specific to the autoantibody and the subject's age. These insights are the outworking of decades of prospective cohort studies and international assay standardization efforts and will contribute to the granularity needed for more sensitive and specific preclinical staging. The aim of this review is to identify the dynamic and nuanced manifestations of autoantibodies in type 1 diabetes, and to highlight how these autoantibody features have the potential to improve study design of trials aiming to predict and prevent disease.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; ; ; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
autoantibody, autoimmunity, preclinical, prediction, stages, type 1 diabetes
in
Endocrine Reviews
volume
42
issue
5
pages
21 pages
publisher
Oxford University Press
external identifiers
  • scopus:85117277537
  • pmid:33881515
ISSN
0163-769X
DOI
10.1210/endrev/bnab013
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
bca0102e-d1b9-4a48-a8c2-fe0a7fa9f332
date added to LUP
2022-03-08 13:54:30
date last changed
2024-04-14 02:41:51
@article{bca0102e-d1b9-4a48-a8c2-fe0a7fa9f332,
  abstract     = {{<p>Islet autoantibodies are key markers for the diagnosis of type 1 diabetes. Since their discovery, they have also been recognized for their potential to identify at-risk individuals prior to symptoms. To date, risk prediction using autoantibodies has been based on autoantibody number; it has been robustly shown that nearly all multiple-autoantibody-positive individuals will progress to clinical disease. However, longitudinal studies have demonstrated that the rate of progression among multiple-autoantibody-positive individuals is highly heterogenous. Accurate prediction of the most rapidly progressing individuals is crucial for efficient and informative clinical trials and for identification of candidates most likely to benefit from disease modification. This is increasingly relevant with the recent success in delaying clinical disease in presymptomatic subjects using immunotherapy, and as the field moves toward population-based screening. There have been many studies investigating islet autoantibody characteristics for their predictive potential, beyond a simple categorical count. Predictive features that have emerged include molecular specifics, such as epitope targets and affinity; longitudinal patterns, such as changes in titer and autoantibody reversion; and sequence-dependent risk profiles specific to the autoantibody and the subject's age. These insights are the outworking of decades of prospective cohort studies and international assay standardization efforts and will contribute to the granularity needed for more sensitive and specific preclinical staging. The aim of this review is to identify the dynamic and nuanced manifestations of autoantibodies in type 1 diabetes, and to highlight how these autoantibody features have the potential to improve study design of trials aiming to predict and prevent disease. </p>}},
  author       = {{So, Michelle and Speake, Cate and Steck, Andrea K. and Lundgren, Markus and Colman, Peter G. and Palmer, Jerry P. and Herold, Kevan C. and Greenbaum, Carla J.}},
  issn         = {{0163-769X}},
  keywords     = {{autoantibody; autoimmunity; preclinical; prediction; stages; type 1 diabetes}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  month        = {{10}},
  number       = {{5}},
  pages        = {{584--604}},
  publisher    = {{Oxford University Press}},
  series       = {{Endocrine Reviews}},
  title        = {{Advances in Type 1 Diabetes Prediction Using Islet Autoantibodies : Beyond a Simple Count}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/endrev/bnab013}},
  doi          = {{10.1210/endrev/bnab013}},
  volume       = {{42}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}