Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Antibodies against neo-epitope of microbial and human transglutaminase complexes as biomarkers of childhood celiac disease

Agardh, D. LU ; Matthias, T. ; Wusterhausen, P. ; Neidhöfer, S. ; Heller, A. and Lerner, A. (2020) In Clinical and Experimental Immunology 199(3). p.294-302
Abstract

Tissue transglutaminase (tTG) and microbial transglutaminase (mTG) cross-link gliadins to form complexes that expose immunogenic neo-epitopes to produce tTG and mTG-neo-epitope antibodies. The aim of this study was to test the diagnostic performance of antibodies against non-complexed and complexed forms of transglutaminases, to correlate their activities to the intestinal damage and to explore age group dependency in celiac disease (CD). A total of 296 children with untreated CD and 215 non-celiac disease controls were checked by in-house enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays detecting immunoglobulin (Ig)A, IgG or combined detection of IgA and IgG (check) against tTG, AESKULISA® tTG New Generation (tTG-neo) and mTG-neo (RUO),... (More)

Tissue transglutaminase (tTG) and microbial transglutaminase (mTG) cross-link gliadins to form complexes that expose immunogenic neo-epitopes to produce tTG and mTG-neo-epitope antibodies. The aim of this study was to test the diagnostic performance of antibodies against non-complexed and complexed forms of transglutaminases, to correlate their activities to the intestinal damage and to explore age group dependency in celiac disease (CD). A total of 296 children with untreated CD and 215 non-celiac disease controls were checked by in-house enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays detecting immunoglobulin (Ig)A, IgG or combined detection of IgA and IgG (check) against tTG, AESKULISA® tTG New Generation (tTG-neo) and mTG-neo (RUO), IgA and IgG antibodies against deamidated gliadin peptide (DGP) and human IgA anti-endomysium antibodies (EMA) using AESKUSLIDES® EMA. Intestinal pathology was graded according the revised Marsh criteria, and age dependencies of the antibody activities were analysed. Using cut-offs estimated from receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, the highest area under curve (AUC) of the TG assays was 0·963 for tTG-neo check, followed by tTG check (0·962) when the diagnosis was based on enteric mucosal histology. tTG-neo check was the most effective to reflect the intestinal abnormalities in CD (r = 0·795, P < 0·0001). High levels of anti-mTG-neo IgG and anti-tTG-neo IgG appeared in the earlier age groups, as compared to anti-tTG IgG (P < 0·001). Considering antibody diagnostic performance based on AUC, enteric damage reflection and predictability at an early age, the anti-neo tTG check was the most effective diagnostic biomarker for pediatric CD. The mTG neo check might represent a new marker for CD screening, diagnosis and predictability.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
antibodies, autoantibodies, celiac disease, diagnosis, human tissue transglutaminase, microbial transglutaminase, serological markers
in
Clinical and Experimental Immunology
volume
199
issue
3
pages
9 pages
publisher
British Society for Immunology
external identifiers
  • scopus:85074976910
  • pmid:31663117
ISSN
0009-9104
DOI
10.1111/cei.13394
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
c283a1bf-b435-4ac9-bef3-d6d4f5a551f3
date added to LUP
2019-12-03 09:40:53
date last changed
2024-12-12 01:23:25
@article{c283a1bf-b435-4ac9-bef3-d6d4f5a551f3,
  abstract     = {{<p>Tissue transglutaminase (tTG) and microbial transglutaminase (mTG) cross-link gliadins to form complexes that expose immunogenic neo-epitopes to produce tTG and mTG-neo-epitope antibodies. The aim of this study was to test the diagnostic performance of antibodies against non-complexed and complexed forms of transglutaminases, to correlate their activities to the intestinal damage and to explore age group dependency in celiac disease (CD). A total of 296 children with untreated CD and 215 non-celiac disease controls were checked by in-house enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays detecting immunoglobulin (Ig)A, IgG or combined detection of IgA and IgG (check) against tTG, AESKULISA<sup>®</sup> tTG New Generation (tTG-neo) and mTG-neo (RUO), IgA and IgG antibodies against deamidated gliadin peptide (DGP) and human IgA anti-endomysium antibodies (EMA) using AESKUSLIDES<sup>®</sup> EMA. Intestinal pathology was graded according the revised Marsh criteria, and age dependencies of the antibody activities were analysed. Using cut-offs estimated from receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, the highest area under curve (AUC) of the TG assays was 0·963 for tTG-neo check, followed by tTG check (0·962) when the diagnosis was based on enteric mucosal histology. tTG-neo check was the most effective to reflect the intestinal abnormalities in CD (r = 0·795, P &lt; 0·0001). High levels of anti-mTG-neo IgG and anti-tTG-neo IgG appeared in the earlier age groups, as compared to anti-tTG IgG (P &lt; 0·001). Considering antibody diagnostic performance based on AUC, enteric damage reflection and predictability at an early age, the anti-neo tTG check was the most effective diagnostic biomarker for pediatric CD. The mTG neo check might represent a new marker for CD screening, diagnosis and predictability.</p>}},
  author       = {{Agardh, D. and Matthias, T. and Wusterhausen, P. and Neidhöfer, S. and Heller, A. and Lerner, A.}},
  issn         = {{0009-9104}},
  keywords     = {{antibodies; autoantibodies; celiac disease; diagnosis; human tissue transglutaminase; microbial transglutaminase; serological markers}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{294--302}},
  publisher    = {{British Society for Immunology}},
  series       = {{Clinical and Experimental Immunology}},
  title        = {{Antibodies against neo-epitope of microbial and human transglutaminase complexes as biomarkers of childhood celiac disease}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cei.13394}},
  doi          = {{10.1111/cei.13394}},
  volume       = {{199}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}