Revisiting Value Configurations : A Multi-Dimensional Framework for Hybrid Forms and Transition Analysis
(2025) In Journal of Innovation Management- Abstract
- Stabell and Fjeldstad (1998) proposed three value configurations; the value shop, the value chain and the value network based on Thompson’s (1967) three technologies as a typology. However, that Thompson’s technologies constitute a typology has been criticized (cf Barbini and Neri, 2017). Also, research has highlighted increased shifts in value configurations and hybrid forms. Thus, the question arises: how can value configurations be classified and along what dimensions, in order to facilitate analysis of hybrid forms and changes between value configurations? This paper expands on the current literature on value configurations to provide a deeper understanding of how they can be classified, particularly in the context of contemporary... (More)
- Stabell and Fjeldstad (1998) proposed three value configurations; the value shop, the value chain and the value network based on Thompson’s (1967) three technologies as a typology. However, that Thompson’s technologies constitute a typology has been criticized (cf Barbini and Neri, 2017). Also, research has highlighted increased shifts in value configurations and hybrid forms. Thus, the question arises: how can value configurations be classified and along what dimensions, in order to facilitate analysis of hybrid forms and changes between value configurations? This paper expands on the current literature on value configurations to provide a deeper understanding of how they can be classified, particularly in the context of contemporary organizations that utilize hybrid forms of value configurations and transition between them. A value configuration map is proposed where the value configurations are positioned along three key dimensions facilitating hybrid position and transition analysis. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/c29ffc51-397c-4134-8194-a6bbf3a01522
- author
- Johansson, Magnus LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2025-10-25
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- in press
- subject
- in
- Journal of Innovation Management
- publisher
- Universidade do Porto - Faculdade de Engenharia
- ISSN
- 2183-0606
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- c29ffc51-397c-4134-8194-a6bbf3a01522
- date added to LUP
- 2025-10-28 13:24:18
- date last changed
- 2025-10-31 09:21:05
@article{c29ffc51-397c-4134-8194-a6bbf3a01522,
abstract = {{Stabell and Fjeldstad (1998) proposed three value configurations; the value shop, the value chain and the value network based on Thompson’s (1967) three technologies as a typology. However, that Thompson’s technologies constitute a typology has been criticized (cf Barbini and Neri, 2017). Also, research has highlighted increased shifts in value configurations and hybrid forms. Thus, the question arises: how can value configurations be classified and along what dimensions, in order to facilitate analysis of hybrid forms and changes between value configurations? This paper expands on the current literature on value configurations to provide a deeper understanding of how they can be classified, particularly in the context of contemporary organizations that utilize hybrid forms of value configurations and transition between them. A value configuration map is proposed where the value configurations are positioned along three key dimensions facilitating hybrid position and transition analysis.}},
author = {{Johansson, Magnus}},
issn = {{2183-0606}},
language = {{eng}},
month = {{10}},
publisher = {{Universidade do Porto - Faculdade de Engenharia}},
series = {{Journal of Innovation Management}},
title = {{Revisiting Value Configurations : A Multi-Dimensional Framework for Hybrid Forms and Transition Analysis}},
year = {{2025}},
}