Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Accuracy of NIH Stroke Scale for diagnosing aphasia

Grönberg, Angelina LU ; Henriksson, Ingrid and Lindgren, Arne LU (2021) In Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 143(4). p.375-382
Abstract

Objectives: The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) has not been validated to diagnose aphasia in the stroke population. We therefore examined the diagnostic accuracy of NIHSS for detecting aphasia in acute ischemic stroke. Methods: Consecutive patients with acute first-ever ischemic stroke were included prospectively in Lund Stroke Register Study at Skåne University Hospital, Sweden. Exclusion criteria were: (a) non-native Swedish; (b) obtundation (c) dementia or psychiatric diagnosis. Patients were assessed with NIHSS item 9 (range 0–3, where 1–3 indicate aphasia) by a NIHSS certified research nurse in the acute phase after stroke onset (median 3 days). Within 24 h after this assessment, a speech therapist evaluated the... (More)

Objectives: The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) has not been validated to diagnose aphasia in the stroke population. We therefore examined the diagnostic accuracy of NIHSS for detecting aphasia in acute ischemic stroke. Methods: Consecutive patients with acute first-ever ischemic stroke were included prospectively in Lund Stroke Register Study at Skåne University Hospital, Sweden. Exclusion criteria were: (a) non-native Swedish; (b) obtundation (c) dementia or psychiatric diagnosis. Patients were assessed with NIHSS item 9 (range 0–3, where 1–3 indicate aphasia) by a NIHSS certified research nurse in the acute phase after stroke onset (median 3 days). Within 24 h after this assessment, a speech therapist evaluated the patients’ language function with the comprehensive language screening test (LAST, range 0–15 where 0–14 indicates aphasia). Data were analyzed using LAST as ‘reference standard’. Results: We examined 221 patients. Among these, 23% (n = 50) had aphasia according to NIHSS (distribution of scores 0, 1, 2, 3 were n = 171, n = 29, n = 12, n = 9) compared to 26% (n = 58) with aphasia according to LAST (score ≤14; median = 11). Assuming LAST as reference standard, NIHSS gave 16 false negatives (NIHSS item 9 = 0) for aphasia (LAST scores range 8–14), and 8 false positives (NIHSS item 9 score = 1) for aphasia, yielding a sensitivity of 72% (0.59–0.83) and a specificity of 95% (0.91–0.98). Conclusions: When using NIHSS for screening and diagnosing aphasia in adults with acute ischemic stroke, patients with severe aphasia can be detected, however, some mild aphasias might be misclassified. Given the 72% sensitivity, absence of aphasia on the NIHSS should not be used to guide stroke treatment.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
aphasia, language tests, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, sensitivity and specificity, stroke
in
Acta Neurologica Scandinavica
volume
143
issue
4
pages
375 - 382
publisher
Wiley-Blackwell
external identifiers
  • scopus:85098210153
  • pmid:33368189
ISSN
0001-6314
DOI
10.1111/ane.13388
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
c34b588e-ed70-4310-8576-dd86692c7b39
date added to LUP
2021-01-11 08:41:28
date last changed
2024-04-17 23:43:42
@article{c34b588e-ed70-4310-8576-dd86692c7b39,
  abstract     = {{<p>Objectives: The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) has not been validated to diagnose aphasia in the stroke population. We therefore examined the diagnostic accuracy of NIHSS for detecting aphasia in acute ischemic stroke. Methods: Consecutive patients with acute first-ever ischemic stroke were included prospectively in Lund Stroke Register Study at Skåne University Hospital, Sweden. Exclusion criteria were: (a) non-native Swedish; (b) obtundation (c) dementia or psychiatric diagnosis. Patients were assessed with NIHSS item 9 (range 0–3, where 1–3 indicate aphasia) by a NIHSS certified research nurse in the acute phase after stroke onset (median 3 days). Within 24 h after this assessment, a speech therapist evaluated the patients’ language function with the comprehensive language screening test (LAST, range 0–15 where 0–14 indicates aphasia). Data were analyzed using LAST as ‘reference standard’. Results: We examined 221 patients. Among these, 23% (n = 50) had aphasia according to NIHSS (distribution of scores 0, 1, 2, 3 were n = 171, n = 29, n = 12, n = 9) compared to 26% (n = 58) with aphasia according to LAST (score ≤14; median = 11). Assuming LAST as reference standard, NIHSS gave 16 false negatives (NIHSS item 9 = 0) for aphasia (LAST scores range 8–14), and 8 false positives (NIHSS item 9 score = 1) for aphasia, yielding a sensitivity of 72% (0.59–0.83) and a specificity of 95% (0.91–0.98). Conclusions: When using NIHSS for screening and diagnosing aphasia in adults with acute ischemic stroke, patients with severe aphasia can be detected, however, some mild aphasias might be misclassified. Given the 72% sensitivity, absence of aphasia on the NIHSS should not be used to guide stroke treatment.</p>}},
  author       = {{Grönberg, Angelina and Henriksson, Ingrid and Lindgren, Arne}},
  issn         = {{0001-6314}},
  keywords     = {{aphasia; language tests; National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; sensitivity and specificity; stroke}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{375--382}},
  publisher    = {{Wiley-Blackwell}},
  series       = {{Acta Neurologica Scandinavica}},
  title        = {{Accuracy of NIH Stroke Scale for diagnosing aphasia}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ane.13388}},
  doi          = {{10.1111/ane.13388}},
  volume       = {{143}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}