Methodological and practical issues regarding phenomenological subtypes of highly suggestible individuals: A response to Kumar
Terhune, Devin LU and Cardeña, Etzel LU
(2010)
In Consciousness and Cognition
19.
p.1154-1155
- Abstract
- In his commentary on our article on phenomenological subtypes of highly suggestible individuals (Terhune & Cardeña, in press), Kumar (in press) argues that methodological differences between our studies and previous research on highly suggestible subtypes temper our ability to link the two and that it is unclear whether the existence of phenomenological subtypes has implications for hypnotherapy. Although we agree that it is premature to make conclusive statements about highly suggestible subtypes, we argue that convergent findings across studies with different methodologies are especially salient because they are unlikely to result from a common set of methodological artifacts. In addition, we describe a number of implications that... (More)
- In his commentary on our article on phenomenological subtypes of highly suggestible individuals (Terhune & Cardeña, in press), Kumar (in press) argues that methodological differences between our studies and previous research on highly suggestible subtypes temper our ability to link the two and that it is unclear whether the existence of phenomenological subtypes has implications for hypnotherapy. Although we agree that it is premature to make conclusive statements about highly suggestible subtypes, we argue that convergent findings across studies with different methodologies are especially salient because they are unlikely to result from a common set of methodological artifacts. In addition, we describe a number of implications that research on phenomenological subtypes has for hypnotherapy. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/1625939
- author
- Terhune, Devin
LU
and Cardeña, Etzel
LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2010
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- Consciousness and Cognition
- volume
- 19
- pages
- 1154 - 1155
- publisher
- Elsevier
- external identifiers
-
- wos:000284519800041
- scopus:78149496552
- ISSN
- 1090-2376
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.concog.2010.05.010
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- c4a0424c-d7d4-4da6-8ba8-960c407e553b (old id 1625939)
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-01 11:04:59
- date last changed
- 2022-01-26 05:10:55
@article{c4a0424c-d7d4-4da6-8ba8-960c407e553b,
abstract = {{In his commentary on our article on phenomenological subtypes of highly suggestible individuals (Terhune & Cardeña, in press), Kumar (in press) argues that methodological differences between our studies and previous research on highly suggestible subtypes temper our ability to link the two and that it is unclear whether the existence of phenomenological subtypes has implications for hypnotherapy. Although we agree that it is premature to make conclusive statements about highly suggestible subtypes, we argue that convergent findings across studies with different methodologies are especially salient because they are unlikely to result from a common set of methodological artifacts. In addition, we describe a number of implications that research on phenomenological subtypes has for hypnotherapy.}},
author = {{Terhune, Devin and Cardeña, Etzel}},
issn = {{1090-2376}},
language = {{eng}},
pages = {{1154--1155}},
publisher = {{Elsevier}},
series = {{Consciousness and Cognition}},
title = {{Methodological and practical issues regarding phenomenological subtypes of highly suggestible individuals: A response to Kumar}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2010.05.010}},
doi = {{10.1016/j.concog.2010.05.010}},
volume = {{19}},
year = {{2010}},
}