Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Public Perceptions concerning Responsibility for Climate Change Adaptation

Persson, Erik LU orcid ; Knaggård, Åsa LU and Eriksson, Kerstin (2021) In Sustainability 13(22).
Abstract
For successful climate change adaptation, the distribution of responsibility within society is an important question. While the literature highlights the need for involving both public and private actors, little is still known of how citizens perceive their own and others’ responsibility, let alone the moral groundings for such perceptions. In this paper, we report the results of a survey regarding people’s attitudes towards different ways of distributing responsibility for climate change adaptation. The survey was distributed to citizens in six Swedish municipalities and completed by 510 respondents. A large number of respondents wanted to assign responsibility for making decisions about and implementing adaptation measures to local... (More)
For successful climate change adaptation, the distribution of responsibility within society is an important question. While the literature highlights the need for involving both public and private actors, little is still known of how citizens perceive their own and others’ responsibility, let alone the moral groundings for such perceptions. In this paper, we report the results of a survey regarding people’s attitudes towards different ways of distributing responsibility for climate change adaptation. The survey was distributed to citizens in six Swedish municipalities and completed by 510 respondents. A large number of respondents wanted to assign responsibility for making decisions about and implementing adaptation measures to local governments, but also to property owners, whereas the national government was raised as responsible for setting decision boundaries and for financial support. The most preferred principles for a fair distribution of responsibility among the respondents were desert, ability, efficiency and need, while the principle of equal shares found less support. All principles received some support, indicating that it is necessary to consider several principles when distributing responsibility for climate change adaptation. Compared to earlier studies, this study shows more nuanced perceptions on who should be responsible and on what moral grounds. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Climate change adaptation, distribution principles, public perception, Responsibility, climate change adaptation, distribution principles, public perception, responsibility
in
Sustainability
volume
13
issue
22
article number
12552
pages
23 pages
publisher
MDPI AG
external identifiers
  • scopus:85119205955
ISSN
2071-1050
DOI
10.3390/su132212552
project
Sustainable Distribution of Responsibility for Climate Change Adaptation
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
c5d18e92-8c44-4502-bc9f-282a31ec13df
date added to LUP
2021-12-27 08:28:57
date last changed
2023-04-02 20:35:24
@article{c5d18e92-8c44-4502-bc9f-282a31ec13df,
  abstract     = {{For successful climate change adaptation, the distribution of responsibility within society is an important question. While the literature highlights the need for involving both public and private actors, little is still known of how citizens perceive their own and others’ responsibility, let alone the moral groundings for such perceptions. In this paper, we report the results of a survey regarding people’s attitudes towards different ways of distributing responsibility for climate change adaptation. The survey was distributed to citizens in six Swedish municipalities and completed by 510 respondents. A large number of respondents wanted to assign responsibility for making decisions about and implementing adaptation measures to local governments, but also to property owners, whereas the national government was raised as responsible for setting decision boundaries and for financial support. The most preferred principles for a fair distribution of responsibility among the respondents were desert, ability, efficiency and need, while the principle of equal shares found less support. All principles received some support, indicating that it is necessary to consider several principles when distributing responsibility for climate change adaptation. Compared to earlier studies, this study shows more nuanced perceptions on who should be responsible and on what moral grounds.}},
  author       = {{Persson, Erik and Knaggård, Åsa and Eriksson, Kerstin}},
  issn         = {{2071-1050}},
  keywords     = {{Climate change adaptation; distribution principles; public perception; Responsibility; climate change adaptation; distribution principles; public perception; responsibility}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{22}},
  publisher    = {{MDPI AG}},
  series       = {{Sustainability}},
  title        = {{Public Perceptions concerning Responsibility for Climate Change Adaptation}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su132212552}},
  doi          = {{10.3390/su132212552}},
  volume       = {{13}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}