Impact of collegial midwifery assistance during second stage of labour on women’s experience : a follow-up from the Swedish Oneplus randomised controlled trial
Häggsgård, Cecilia LU ; Edqvist, Malin LU
; Teleman, Pia
LU
; Tern, Helena
LU
and Rubertsson, Christine
LU
(2024)
In BMJ Open
14(7).
- Abstract
Objective To compare experiences of the second stage of labour in women randomised to assistance by one or by two midwives to reduce severe perineal trauma (SPT). Design Analysis of a secondary outcome within the Swedish Oneplus multicentre randomised trial. Setting Five obstetric units in Sweden between December 2018 and March 2020. Participants Inclusion criteria in the Oneplus trial were women opting for their first vaginal birth from gestational week 37+0 with a singleton pregnancy and a live fetus in the vertex presentation. Further inclusion criteria were language proficiency in Swedish, English, Arabic or Farsi. Exclusion criteria were multiple pregnancies, intrauterine fetal demise and planned caesarean section. Of the 3059... (More)
Objective To compare experiences of the second stage of labour in women randomised to assistance by one or by two midwives to reduce severe perineal trauma (SPT). Design Analysis of a secondary outcome within the Swedish Oneplus multicentre randomised trial. Setting Five obstetric units in Sweden between December 2018 and March 2020. Participants Inclusion criteria in the Oneplus trial were women opting for their first vaginal birth from gestational week 37+0 with a singleton pregnancy and a live fetus in the vertex presentation. Further inclusion criteria were language proficiency in Swedish, English, Arabic or Farsi. Exclusion criteria were multiple pregnancies, intrauterine fetal demise and planned caesarean section. Of the 3059 women who had a spontaneous vaginal birth, 2831 women had consented to participate in the follow-up questionnaire. Interventions Women were randomly assigned (1:1) to assistance by two midwives (intervention group) or one midwife (standard care) when reaching the second stage of labour. Outcome measures Data were analysed by intention to treat. Comparisons between intervention and standard care regarding experiences of the second stage of labour were evaluated with items rated on Likert scales. The Student’s t-test was used to calculate mean differences with 95% CIs. Results In total 2221 (78.5%) women responded to the questionnaire. There were no statistically significant differences regarding women’s experiences of being in control, feelings of vulnerability or pain. Women randomised to be assisted by two midwives agreed to a lesser extent that they could handle the situation during the second stage (mean 3.18 vs 3.26, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.15). Conducted subgroup analyses revealed that this result originated from one of the study sites. Conclusions The intervention’s lack of impact on the experience of the second stage is of importance considering the reduction in SPT when being assisted by two midwives.
(Less)
- author
- Häggsgård, Cecilia
LU
; Edqvist, Malin
LU
; Teleman, Pia
LU
; Tern, Helena
LU
and Rubertsson, Christine
LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2024-07
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- BMJ Open
- volume
- 14
- issue
- 7
- article number
- e077458
- publisher
- BMJ Publishing Group
- external identifiers
-
- pmid:39067883
- scopus:85199936550
- ISSN
- 2044-6055
- DOI
- 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077458
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- c6f4f5f5-5065-45b8-b499-b04eb017a0ad
- date added to LUP
- 2024-09-23 15:44:20
- date last changed
- 2024-09-24 03:04:18
@article{c6f4f5f5-5065-45b8-b499-b04eb017a0ad,
abstract = {{<p>Objective To compare experiences of the second stage of labour in women randomised to assistance by one or by two midwives to reduce severe perineal trauma (SPT). Design Analysis of a secondary outcome within the Swedish Oneplus multicentre randomised trial. Setting Five obstetric units in Sweden between December 2018 and March 2020. Participants Inclusion criteria in the Oneplus trial were women opting for their first vaginal birth from gestational week 37+0 with a singleton pregnancy and a live fetus in the vertex presentation. Further inclusion criteria were language proficiency in Swedish, English, Arabic or Farsi. Exclusion criteria were multiple pregnancies, intrauterine fetal demise and planned caesarean section. Of the 3059 women who had a spontaneous vaginal birth, 2831 women had consented to participate in the follow-up questionnaire. Interventions Women were randomly assigned (1:1) to assistance by two midwives (intervention group) or one midwife (standard care) when reaching the second stage of labour. Outcome measures Data were analysed by intention to treat. Comparisons between intervention and standard care regarding experiences of the second stage of labour were evaluated with items rated on Likert scales. The Student’s t-test was used to calculate mean differences with 95% CIs. Results In total 2221 (78.5%) women responded to the questionnaire. There were no statistically significant differences regarding women’s experiences of being in control, feelings of vulnerability or pain. Women randomised to be assisted by two midwives agreed to a lesser extent that they could handle the situation during the second stage (mean 3.18 vs 3.26, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.15). Conducted subgroup analyses revealed that this result originated from one of the study sites. Conclusions The intervention’s lack of impact on the experience of the second stage is of importance considering the reduction in SPT when being assisted by two midwives.</p>}},
author = {{Häggsgård, Cecilia and Edqvist, Malin and Teleman, Pia and Tern, Helena and Rubertsson, Christine}},
issn = {{2044-6055}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{7}},
publisher = {{BMJ Publishing Group}},
series = {{BMJ Open}},
title = {{Impact of collegial midwifery assistance during second stage of labour on women’s experience : a follow-up from the Swedish Oneplus randomised controlled trial}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077458}},
doi = {{10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077458}},
volume = {{14}},
year = {{2024}},
}