Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Aboveground insect herbivory increases plant competitive asymmetry, while belowground herbivory mitigates the effect

Borgström, Pernilla LU ; Strengbom, Joachim ; Viketoft, Maria and Bommarco, Riccardo (2016) In PeerJ p.1-18
Abstract
Insect herbivores can shift the composition of a plant community, but the mechanismunderlying such shifts remains largely unexplored. A possibility is that insects alter thecompetitive symmetry between plant species. The effect of herbivory on competitionlikely depends on whether the plants are subjected to aboveground or belowgroundherbivory or both, and also depends on soil nitrogen levels. It is unclear how these bioticand abiotic factors interactively affect competition. In a greenhouse experiment, wemeasured competition between two coexisting grass species that respond differently tonitrogen deposition:Dactylis glomerataL., which is competitively favoured by nitrogenaddition, andFestuca rubraL., which is competitively favoured on... (More)
Insect herbivores can shift the composition of a plant community, but the mechanismunderlying such shifts remains largely unexplored. A possibility is that insects alter thecompetitive symmetry between plant species. The effect of herbivory on competitionlikely depends on whether the plants are subjected to aboveground or belowgroundherbivory or both, and also depends on soil nitrogen levels. It is unclear how these bioticand abiotic factors interactively affect competition. In a greenhouse experiment, wemeasured competition between two coexisting grass species that respond differently tonitrogen deposition:Dactylis glomerataL., which is competitively favoured by nitrogenaddition, andFestuca rubraL., which is competitively favoured on nitrogen-poor soils.We predicted: (1) that aboveground herbivory would reduce competitive asymmetryat high soil nitrogen by reducing the competitive advantage ofD. glomerata; and (2),that belowground herbivory would relax competition at low soil nitrogen, by reducingthe competitive advantage ofF. rubra. Aboveground herbivory caused a 46% decreasein the competitive ability ofF. rubra, and a 23% increase in that ofD. glomerata, thusincreasing competitive asymmetry, independently of soil nitrogen level. Belowgroundherbivory did not affect competitive symmetry, but the combined influence of above-and belowground herbivory was weaker than predicted from their individual effects.Belowground herbivory thus mitigated the increased competitive asymmetry causedby aboveground herbivory.D. glomerataremained competitively dominant after thecessation of aboveground herbivory, showing that the influence of herbivory continuedbeyond the feeding period. We showed that insect herbivory can strongly influenceplant competitive interactions. In our experimental plant community, abovegroundinsect herbivory increased the risk of competitive exclusion ofF. rubra. Belowgroundherbivory appeared to mitigate the influence of aboveground herbivory, and thismechanism may play a role for plant species coexistence. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; and
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
in
PeerJ
pages
18 pages
publisher
PeerJ
external identifiers
  • scopus:84965156364
ISSN
2167-8359
DOI
10.7717/peerj.1867
language
English
LU publication?
no
id
c89d0181-d402-402a-8dba-24fadf594944
date added to LUP
2019-04-04 11:37:36
date last changed
2022-03-10 01:46:13
@article{c89d0181-d402-402a-8dba-24fadf594944,
  abstract     = {{Insect herbivores can shift the composition of a plant community, but the mechanismunderlying such shifts remains largely unexplored. A possibility is that insects alter thecompetitive symmetry between plant species. The effect of herbivory on competitionlikely depends on whether the plants are subjected to aboveground or belowgroundherbivory or both, and also depends on soil nitrogen levels. It is unclear how these bioticand abiotic factors interactively affect competition. In a greenhouse experiment, wemeasured competition between two coexisting grass species that respond differently tonitrogen deposition:Dactylis glomerataL., which is competitively favoured by nitrogenaddition, andFestuca rubraL., which is competitively favoured on nitrogen-poor soils.We predicted: (1) that aboveground herbivory would reduce competitive asymmetryat high soil nitrogen by reducing the competitive advantage ofD. glomerata; and (2),that belowground herbivory would relax competition at low soil nitrogen, by reducingthe competitive advantage ofF. rubra. Aboveground herbivory caused a 46% decreasein the competitive ability ofF. rubra, and a 23% increase in that ofD. glomerata, thusincreasing competitive asymmetry, independently of soil nitrogen level. Belowgroundherbivory did not affect competitive symmetry, but the combined influence of above-and belowground herbivory was weaker than predicted from their individual effects.Belowground herbivory thus mitigated the increased competitive asymmetry causedby aboveground herbivory.D. glomerataremained competitively dominant after thecessation of aboveground herbivory, showing that the influence of herbivory continuedbeyond the feeding period. We showed that insect herbivory can strongly influenceplant competitive interactions. In our experimental plant community, abovegroundinsect herbivory increased the risk of competitive exclusion ofF. rubra. Belowgroundherbivory appeared to mitigate the influence of aboveground herbivory, and thismechanism may play a role for plant species coexistence.}},
  author       = {{Borgström, Pernilla and Strengbom, Joachim and Viketoft, Maria and Bommarco, Riccardo}},
  issn         = {{2167-8359}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  month        = {{04}},
  pages        = {{1--18}},
  publisher    = {{PeerJ}},
  series       = {{PeerJ}},
  title        = {{Aboveground insect herbivory increases plant competitive asymmetry, while belowground herbivory mitigates the effect}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1867}},
  doi          = {{10.7717/peerj.1867}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}