Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

The COST benchmark simulation model - current state and future perspective

Jeppsson, Ulf LU and Pons, MN (2004) In Control Engineering Practice 12(3). p.299-304
Abstract
The paper introduces the philosophy and current status of a benchmark for the evaluation of control strategies in wastewater treatment plants and also the forthcoming developments and future perspectives. The work has been carried out within the framework of two COST Actions (682 and 624) and in close collaboration with the IWA Task Group on Respirometry. The benchmark is a platform-independent simulation environment defining a plant layout, a simulation model, influent loads, test procedures and evaluation criteria. Several different research teams have contributed to the development of the benchmark and have obtained results using several simulation platforms (GPS-X(TM), MATLAB/SIMULINK(TM), SIMBA(R), WEST(R), FORTRAN code, etc.). A... (More)
The paper introduces the philosophy and current status of a benchmark for the evaluation of control strategies in wastewater treatment plants and also the forthcoming developments and future perspectives. The work has been carried out within the framework of two COST Actions (682 and 624) and in close collaboration with the IWA Task Group on Respirometry. The benchmark is a platform-independent simulation environment defining a plant layout, a simulation model, influent loads, test procedures and evaluation criteria. Several different research teams have contributed to the development of the benchmark and have obtained results using several simulation platforms (GPS-X(TM), MATLAB/SIMULINK(TM), SIMBA(R), WEST(R), FORTRAN code, etc.). A short introduction to the six scientific papers of this special section dealing with various aspects of the COST benchmark simulation model is also given. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
control strategy, benchmarking, modelling, simulation, performance assessment, wastewater treatment
in
Control Engineering Practice
volume
12
issue
3
pages
299 - 304
publisher
Elsevier
external identifiers
  • wos:000188647300007
  • scopus:1142281080
ISSN
0967-0661
DOI
10.1016/j.conengprac.2003.07.001
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
c9df0a5f-e2c0-4c9c-ade5-6dec39c705cd (old id 288819)
date added to LUP
2016-04-01 12:25:37
date last changed
2022-04-13 18:49:54
@misc{c9df0a5f-e2c0-4c9c-ade5-6dec39c705cd,
  abstract     = {{The paper introduces the philosophy and current status of a benchmark for the evaluation of control strategies in wastewater treatment plants and also the forthcoming developments and future perspectives. The work has been carried out within the framework of two COST Actions (682 and 624) and in close collaboration with the IWA Task Group on Respirometry. The benchmark is a platform-independent simulation environment defining a plant layout, a simulation model, influent loads, test procedures and evaluation criteria. Several different research teams have contributed to the development of the benchmark and have obtained results using several simulation platforms (GPS-X(TM), MATLAB/SIMULINK(TM), SIMBA(R), WEST(R), FORTRAN code, etc.). A short introduction to the six scientific papers of this special section dealing with various aspects of the COST benchmark simulation model is also given. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.}},
  author       = {{Jeppsson, Ulf and Pons, MN}},
  issn         = {{0967-0661}},
  keywords     = {{control strategy; benchmarking; modelling; simulation; performance assessment; wastewater treatment}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{299--304}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier}},
  series       = {{Control Engineering Practice}},
  title        = {{The COST benchmark simulation model - current state and future perspective}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2003.07.001}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.conengprac.2003.07.001}},
  volume       = {{12}},
  year         = {{2004}},
}