Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

The link between auditory salience and emotion intensity

Anikin, Andrey LU orcid (2020) In Cognition and Emotion 34(6). p.1246-1259
Abstract
To ensure that listeners pay attention and do not habituate, emotionally intense vocalizations may be under evolutionary pressure to exploit processing biases in the auditory system by maximising their bottom-up salience. This “salience code” hypothesis was tested using 128 human nonverbal vocalizations representing eight emotions: amusement, anger, disgust, effort, fear, pain, pleasure, and sadness. As expected, within each emotion category salience ratings derived from pairwise comparisons strongly correlated with perceived emotion intensity. For example, while laughs as a class were less salient than screams of fear, salience scores almost perfectly explained the perceived intensity of both amusement and fear considered separately.... (More)
To ensure that listeners pay attention and do not habituate, emotionally intense vocalizations may be under evolutionary pressure to exploit processing biases in the auditory system by maximising their bottom-up salience. This “salience code” hypothesis was tested using 128 human nonverbal vocalizations representing eight emotions: amusement, anger, disgust, effort, fear, pain, pleasure, and sadness. As expected, within each emotion category salience ratings derived from pairwise comparisons strongly correlated with perceived emotion intensity. For example, while laughs as a class were less salient than screams of fear, salience scores almost perfectly explained the perceived intensity of both amusement and fear considered separately. Validating self-rated salience evaluations, high- vs. low-salience sounds caused 25% more recall errors in a short-term memory task, whereas emotion intensity had no independent effect on recall errors. Furthermore, the acoustic characteristics of salient vocalizations were similar to those previously described for non-emotional sounds (greater duration and intensity, high pitch, bright timbre, rapid modulations, and variable spectral characteristics), confirming that vocalizations were not salient merely because of their emotional content. The acoustic code in nonverbal communication is thus aligned with sensory biases, offering a general explanation for some non-arbitrary properties of human and animal high-arousal vocalizations. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
in
Cognition and Emotion
volume
34
issue
6
pages
14 pages
publisher
Taylor & Francis
external identifiers
  • scopus:85081395533
  • pmid:32126893
ISSN
0269-9931
DOI
10.1080/02699931.2020.1736992
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
cbfa2cbe-fa3a-4ab6-90f2-3cf4329958df
date added to LUP
2020-03-07 15:06:04
date last changed
2022-04-18 20:57:57
@article{cbfa2cbe-fa3a-4ab6-90f2-3cf4329958df,
  abstract     = {{To ensure that listeners pay attention and do not habituate, emotionally intense vocalizations may be under evolutionary pressure to exploit processing biases in the auditory system by maximising their bottom-up salience. This “salience code” hypothesis was tested using 128 human nonverbal vocalizations representing eight emotions: amusement, anger, disgust, effort, fear, pain, pleasure, and sadness. As expected, within each emotion category salience ratings derived from pairwise comparisons strongly correlated with perceived emotion intensity. For example, while laughs as a class were less salient than screams of fear, salience scores almost perfectly explained the perceived intensity of both amusement and fear considered separately. Validating self-rated salience evaluations, high- vs. low-salience sounds caused 25% more recall errors in a short-term memory task, whereas emotion intensity had no independent effect on recall errors. Furthermore, the acoustic characteristics of salient vocalizations were similar to those previously described for non-emotional sounds (greater duration and intensity, high pitch, bright timbre, rapid modulations, and variable spectral characteristics), confirming that vocalizations were not salient merely because of their emotional content. The acoustic code in nonverbal communication is thus aligned with sensory biases, offering a general explanation for some non-arbitrary properties of human and animal high-arousal vocalizations.}},
  author       = {{Anikin, Andrey}},
  issn         = {{0269-9931}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  month        = {{03}},
  number       = {{6}},
  pages        = {{1246--1259}},
  publisher    = {{Taylor & Francis}},
  series       = {{Cognition and Emotion}},
  title        = {{The link between auditory salience and emotion intensity}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2020.1736992}},
  doi          = {{10.1080/02699931.2020.1736992}},
  volume       = {{34}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}