Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Emotions during the Covid-19 pandemic : Fear, anxiety, and anger as mediators between threats and policy support and political actions

Renström, Emma A. LU and Bäck, Hanna LU orcid (2021) In Journal of Applied Social Psychology 51(8). p.861-877
Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic has significantly changed the lives of most people. It has been described as the most severe global health disaster of modern times by the United Nations. No doubt such a major crisis influences what citizens think of different policies, and how they become politically active, not to mention, the forceful emotional experiences that the Covid-19 pandemic brings. This study evaluates how emotions affect support for policies related to restricting the spread of the virus and economic assistance, and how emotions affect intentions to engage politically. In an experiment (N = 1,072), we manipulated emotional reactions to threat by highlighting different aspects of the pandemic. Our findings show that different... (More)

The Covid-19 pandemic has significantly changed the lives of most people. It has been described as the most severe global health disaster of modern times by the United Nations. No doubt such a major crisis influences what citizens think of different policies, and how they become politically active, not to mention, the forceful emotional experiences that the Covid-19 pandemic brings. This study evaluates how emotions affect support for policies related to restricting the spread of the virus and economic assistance, and how emotions affect intentions to engage politically. In an experiment (N = 1,072), we manipulated emotional reactions to threat by highlighting different aspects of the pandemic. Our findings show that different experimental treatments elicit different emotions, and that fear, anxiety, and anger are all related to policy support and political action intentions, but in different ways. Fear and anger predict support for restrictive policies to limit the spread of the virus, while anxiety predicts support for economic policies. Anger and anxiety, but not fear, increase intentions to engage politically. Hence, we find support for a mechanism where different aspects of the Covid-19 crisis evoke different emotional reactions, which in turn affects policy support and political actions differently.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
in
Journal of Applied Social Psychology
volume
51
issue
8
pages
861 - 877
publisher
V H WINSTON & SON INC
external identifiers
  • pmid:34511637
  • scopus:85108166086
ISSN
0021-9029
DOI
10.1111/jasp.12806
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
ccce8d6a-15b2-4a70-bbd7-31067a2cfc7b
date added to LUP
2021-07-13 14:09:00
date last changed
2024-06-16 16:02:02
@article{ccce8d6a-15b2-4a70-bbd7-31067a2cfc7b,
  abstract     = {{<p>The Covid-19 pandemic has significantly changed the lives of most people. It has been described as the most severe global health disaster of modern times by the United Nations. No doubt such a major crisis influences what citizens think of different policies, and how they become politically active, not to mention, the forceful emotional experiences that the Covid-19 pandemic brings. This study evaluates how emotions affect support for policies related to restricting the spread of the virus and economic assistance, and how emotions affect intentions to engage politically. In an experiment (N = 1,072), we manipulated emotional reactions to threat by highlighting different aspects of the pandemic. Our findings show that different experimental treatments elicit different emotions, and that fear, anxiety, and anger are all related to policy support and political action intentions, but in different ways. Fear and anger predict support for restrictive policies to limit the spread of the virus, while anxiety predicts support for economic policies. Anger and anxiety, but not fear, increase intentions to engage politically. Hence, we find support for a mechanism where different aspects of the Covid-19 crisis evoke different emotional reactions, which in turn affects policy support and political actions differently.</p>}},
  author       = {{Renström, Emma A. and Bäck, Hanna}},
  issn         = {{0021-9029}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{8}},
  pages        = {{861--877}},
  publisher    = {{V H WINSTON & SON INC}},
  series       = {{Journal of Applied Social Psychology}},
  title        = {{Emotions during the Covid-19 pandemic : Fear, anxiety, and anger as mediators between threats and policy support and political actions}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12806}},
  doi          = {{10.1111/jasp.12806}},
  volume       = {{51}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}