Advanced

Building Kindey Exchange Programmes in Europe - An Overview of Exchange Practice and Activities

Biró, Péter; Haase-Kromwijk, Bernadette; Andersson, Tommy LU ; Ásgeirsson, Eyjólfur Ingi; Baltesová, Tatiana; Boletis, Ioannis; Bolotinha, Catarina; Bond, Gregor; Böhmig , Georg and Burnapp , Lisa, et al. (2019) In Transplantation 103(7). p.1514-1522
Abstract
Bakgrund: Considerable differences exist among the living donor Kidney Exchange Programmes (KEPs) that are in use and being built in Europe, contributing to a variation in the number of living donor transplants [6]. Efforts of European KEPs to exchange (best) practices and share approaches to address challenges have, however, been limited.

Methods: Experts from 23 European countries, collaborating on the ENCKEP COST Action, developed a questionnaire to collect detailed information on the functioning of all existing KEPs in Europe, as well as their opportunities and challenges. Following a comparative analysis, results were synthesised and interpreted by the same experts.

Results: The practices, opportunities and... (More)
Bakgrund: Considerable differences exist among the living donor Kidney Exchange Programmes (KEPs) that are in use and being built in Europe, contributing to a variation in the number of living donor transplants [6]. Efforts of European KEPs to exchange (best) practices and share approaches to address challenges have, however, been limited.

Methods: Experts from 23 European countries, collaborating on the ENCKEP COST Action, developed a questionnaire to collect detailed information on the functioning of all existing KEPs in Europe, as well as their opportunities and challenges. Following a comparative analysis, results were synthesised and interpreted by the same experts.

Results: The practices, opportunities and challenges reported by 17 European countries reveal that some of the 10 operating programmes are mature, while others are in earlier stages of development. Over 1300 transplants were performed through existing KEPs up to the end of 2016, providing approximately 8% of their countries’ living kidney donations in 2015. All countries report challenges to either initiating KEPs or increasing volumes. Some challenges are shared, whilst others differ because of differences in context (eg, country size, effectiveness of deceased donor programme) and ethical and legal considerations (eg, regarding living donation as such, nonrelated donors, and altruistic donation). Transnational initiatives have started in Central Europe, Scandinavia, and Southern Europe.

Conclusions: Exchange of best practices and shared advancement of national programmes to address existing challenges, aided by transnational exchanges, may substantially improve access to the most (cost) effective treatment for the increasing number of patients suffering from kidney disease. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
, et al. (More)
(Less)
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
in
Transplantation
volume
103
issue
7
pages
1514 - 1522
publisher
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
external identifiers
  • scopus:85068821560
ISSN
1534-6080
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
ccdbcb9a-3aac-48cb-b595-f9bfa00cdd78
alternative location
https://journals.lww.com/transplantjournal/Fulltext/2019/07000/Building_Kidney_Exchange_Programmes_in_Europe_An.34.aspx#pdf-link
date added to LUP
2019-04-12 16:16:14
date last changed
2019-08-14 04:35:06
@article{ccdbcb9a-3aac-48cb-b595-f9bfa00cdd78,
  abstract     = {Bakgrund: Considerable differences exist among the living donor Kidney Exchange Programmes (KEPs) that are in use and being built in Europe, contributing to a variation in the number of living donor transplants [6]. Efforts of European KEPs to exchange (best) practices and share approaches to address challenges have, however, been limited.<br/><br/>Methods: Experts from 23 European countries, collaborating on the ENCKEP COST Action, developed a questionnaire to collect detailed information on the functioning of all existing KEPs in Europe, as well as their opportunities and challenges. Following a comparative analysis, results were synthesised and interpreted by the same experts.<br/><br/>Results: The practices, opportunities and challenges reported by 17 European countries reveal that some of the 10 operating programmes are mature, while others are in earlier stages of development. Over 1300 transplants were performed through existing KEPs up to the end of 2016, providing approximately 8% of their countries’ living kidney donations in 2015. All countries report challenges to either initiating KEPs or increasing volumes. Some challenges are shared, whilst others differ because of differences in context (eg, country size, effectiveness of deceased donor programme) and ethical and legal considerations (eg, regarding living donation as such, nonrelated donors, and altruistic donation). Transnational initiatives have started in Central Europe, Scandinavia, and Southern Europe.<br/><br/>Conclusions: Exchange of best practices and shared advancement of national programmes to address existing challenges, aided by transnational exchanges, may substantially improve access to the most (cost) effective treatment for the increasing number of patients suffering from kidney disease.},
  author       = {Biró, Péter and Haase-Kromwijk, Bernadette and Andersson, Tommy and Ásgeirsson, Eyjólfur Ingi and Baltesová, Tatiana and Boletis, Ioannis and  Bolotinha, Catarina and Bond, Gregor and Böhmig , Georg and Burnapp , Lisa and Klundert, Joris},
  issn         = {1534-6080},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {7},
  pages        = {1514--1522},
  publisher    = {Lippincott Williams & Wilkins},
  series       = {Transplantation},
  title        = {Building Kindey Exchange Programmes in Europe - An Overview of Exchange Practice and Activities},
  volume       = {103},
  year         = {2019},
}