Adaptive radiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer : The importance of reduced margins
(2025) In Physics and imaging in radiation oncology 33.- Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) involves treatment re-planning based on anatomical changes, which may improve target coverage and sparing of organs-at-risk (OARs). This study retrospectively assessed the technical feasibility and potential benefits of daily ART in combination with reduced planning target volume (PTV) margins for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients, encompassing 902 treatment fractions, treated with radiotherapy to 60.0-68.0 Gy in 2 Gy/fraction were studied. Synthetic CTs (sCT) from daily kVCT images were created and contours propagated using deformable image registration (DIR). Target contours were reviewed and corrected. On the sCT,... (More)
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) involves treatment re-planning based on anatomical changes, which may improve target coverage and sparing of organs-at-risk (OARs). This study retrospectively assessed the technical feasibility and potential benefits of daily ART in combination with reduced planning target volume (PTV) margins for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients, encompassing 902 treatment fractions, treated with radiotherapy to 60.0-68.0 Gy in 2 Gy/fraction were studied. Synthetic CTs (sCT) from daily kVCT images were created and contours propagated using deformable image registration (DIR). Target contours were reviewed and corrected. On the sCT, non-adapted delivered doses and ART-plans with 5 mm (clinical standard) and 2 mm PTV-margin were evaluated. All daily dose distributions were then accumulated.
RESULTS: Target contours required correction in 48 % of the fractions. Daily non-adapted D98%,CTV was > 95 % in 890 (5 mm) and 825 (2 mm) out of 902 fractions. All adapted plans achieved D98%,CTV > 95 %. Significant reductions in mean doses to OARs were observed for PTV = 2 mm ART-plans: 4.1 Gy for parotid, 2.6 Gy for submandibular, 3.3 Gy for oral cavity, 4.0 Gy for esophagus, and 3.8 Gy for larynx.
CONCLUSION: ART-planning on sCT and DIR propagated contours was feasible and promising for further clinical testing. To obtain a potential clinical benefit of ART, a synchronous reduction of the PTV-margin was warranted. Daily ART can be used to maintain adequate target dosimetry for every fraction, though for the accumulated treatment, insufficient target coverage without ART is unlikely to occur.
(Less)
- author
- Enocson, Hedda
LU
; Haraldsson, André
LU
; Engström, Per
LU
; Ceberg, Sofie
LU
; Gebre-Medhin, Maria
LU
; Adrian, Gabriel
LU
and Af Rosenschöld, Per Munck LU
- organization
-
- Radiotherapy Physics (research group)
- Medical Radiation Physics, Lund
- Department Office of Clinical Sciences, Lund
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund
- LUCC: Lund University Cancer Centre
- Radiation therapy
- Head and Neck Cancer Research Group (research group)
- LU Profile Area: Light and Materials
- LTH Profile Area: Photon Science and Technology
- publishing date
- 2025-01
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Adaptive radiotherapy, Head-and-neck cancer, Re-planning, Radiotherapy, Tomotherapy, VMAT, Deformable registration, IGRT
- in
- Physics and imaging in radiation oncology
- volume
- 33
- article number
- 100696
- pages
- 7 pages
- publisher
- Elsevier
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85215405373
- pmid:39897022
- ISSN
- 2405-6316
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.phro.2025.100696
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- additional info
- © 2025 The Author(s).
- id
- ce547ef8-2c78-4a64-8a84-156a265a58a9
- date added to LUP
- 2025-02-20 14:02:39
- date last changed
- 2025-07-11 15:50:24
@article{ce547ef8-2c78-4a64-8a84-156a265a58a9, abstract = {{<p>BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) involves treatment re-planning based on anatomical changes, which may improve target coverage and sparing of organs-at-risk (OARs). This study retrospectively assessed the technical feasibility and potential benefits of daily ART in combination with reduced planning target volume (PTV) margins for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).</p><p>MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients, encompassing 902 treatment fractions, treated with radiotherapy to 60.0-68.0 Gy in 2 Gy/fraction were studied. Synthetic CTs (sCT) from daily kVCT images were created and contours propagated using deformable image registration (DIR). Target contours were reviewed and corrected. On the sCT, non-adapted delivered doses and ART-plans with 5 mm (clinical standard) and 2 mm PTV-margin were evaluated. All daily dose distributions were then accumulated.</p><p>RESULTS: Target contours required correction in 48 % of the fractions. Daily non-adapted D98%,CTV was > 95 % in 890 (5 mm) and 825 (2 mm) out of 902 fractions. All adapted plans achieved D98%,CTV > 95 %. Significant reductions in mean doses to OARs were observed for PTV = 2 mm ART-plans: 4.1 Gy for parotid, 2.6 Gy for submandibular, 3.3 Gy for oral cavity, 4.0 Gy for esophagus, and 3.8 Gy for larynx.</p><p>CONCLUSION: ART-planning on sCT and DIR propagated contours was feasible and promising for further clinical testing. To obtain a potential clinical benefit of ART, a synchronous reduction of the PTV-margin was warranted. Daily ART can be used to maintain adequate target dosimetry for every fraction, though for the accumulated treatment, insufficient target coverage without ART is unlikely to occur.</p>}}, author = {{Enocson, Hedda and Haraldsson, André and Engström, Per and Ceberg, Sofie and Gebre-Medhin, Maria and Adrian, Gabriel and Af Rosenschöld, Per Munck}}, issn = {{2405-6316}}, keywords = {{Adaptive radiotherapy; Head-and-neck cancer; Re-planning; Radiotherapy; Tomotherapy; VMAT; Deformable registration; IGRT}}, language = {{eng}}, publisher = {{Elsevier}}, series = {{Physics and imaging in radiation oncology}}, title = {{Adaptive radiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer : The importance of reduced margins}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2025.100696}}, doi = {{10.1016/j.phro.2025.100696}}, volume = {{33}}, year = {{2025}}, }