Heterogamy and contraceptive use among married and cohabiting women
(2022) In Advances in Life Course Research 53.- Abstract
- Decisions about which contraceptives to use are a key component of a couple’s “fertility work,” and these decisions can be made in homogamous or heterogamous couple contexts. Relative resource theory and the strain perspective suggest that heterogamy may lead to differences in bargaining power or higher levels of discordance within couples, thereby affecting the distribution of fertility work and decisions about which contraceptives a couple will use. While heterogamy has been linked to less effective contraceptive use amongst teenagers, its role in the contraceptive behavior of married and cohabiting women has been less widely studied. This study examines the association between relationship context in terms of education, age, and... (More)
- Decisions about which contraceptives to use are a key component of a couple’s “fertility work,” and these decisions can be made in homogamous or heterogamous couple contexts. Relative resource theory and the strain perspective suggest that heterogamy may lead to differences in bargaining power or higher levels of discordance within couples, thereby affecting the distribution of fertility work and decisions about which contraceptives a couple will use. While heterogamy has been linked to less effective contraceptive use amongst teenagers, its role in the contraceptive behavior of married and cohabiting women has been less widely studied. This study examines the association between relationship context in terms of education, age, and race/ethnicity heterogamy and partnered women’s use of contraceptives. We used data on partnered women aged 20-45 who were trying to avoid pregnancy from the 2006-2015 National Survey of Family Growth (n= 8,097). We used multinomial logistic regressions to determine whether education, age, or race/ethnicity heterogamy was associated with the use of male or female sterilization, long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs), other hormonal contraceptives, or other non-hormonal methods. We did not find consistent evidence that relative bargaining power due to higher education, more advanced age, or racial/ethnic privilege resulted in the use of methods requiring lower levels of fertility work. We found some evidence supporting the strain perspective. Younger women (20-34) who differed from their partners along two or more dimensions were less likely to use contraceptive methods requiring ongoing effort and coordination (i.e., LARCs, other hormonal methods, and non-hormonal methods). This association was not observed among women aged 35-45. Despite the more permanent nature of marriage/cohabitation, differences between partners in heterogamous relationships may factor into the contraceptive decision-making process, especially among younger adults at earlier stages of their relationships. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/d0439d9d-6db3-4755-9dd5-6d1fa85fae85
- author
- Stanfors, Maria LU and Jacobs, Josephine
- organization
- publishing date
- 2022-06
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- heterogamy, contraception, marriage/cohabitation, United States, National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG), multinomial logistic regression
- in
- Advances in Life Course Research
- volume
- 53
- article number
- 100492
- publisher
- Elsevier
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85146531976
- pmid:36652210
- ISSN
- 1569-4909
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.alcr.2022.100492
- project
- Educational assortative mating and inequality. Consequences of changing family dynamics in Sweden, 1970-2020
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- d0439d9d-6db3-4755-9dd5-6d1fa85fae85
- date added to LUP
- 2022-06-12 17:15:54
- date last changed
- 2023-03-13 03:00:03
@article{d0439d9d-6db3-4755-9dd5-6d1fa85fae85,
abstract = {{Decisions about which contraceptives to use are a key component of a couple’s “fertility work,” and these decisions can be made in homogamous or heterogamous couple contexts. Relative resource theory and the strain perspective suggest that heterogamy may lead to differences in bargaining power or higher levels of discordance within couples, thereby affecting the distribution of fertility work and decisions about which contraceptives a couple will use. While heterogamy has been linked to less effective contraceptive use amongst teenagers, its role in the contraceptive behavior of married and cohabiting women has been less widely studied. This study examines the association between relationship context in terms of education, age, and race/ethnicity heterogamy and partnered women’s use of contraceptives. We used data on partnered women aged 20-45 who were trying to avoid pregnancy from the 2006-2015 National Survey of Family Growth (n= 8,097). We used multinomial logistic regressions to determine whether education, age, or race/ethnicity heterogamy was associated with the use of male or female sterilization, long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs), other hormonal contraceptives, or other non-hormonal methods. We did not find consistent evidence that relative bargaining power due to higher education, more advanced age, or racial/ethnic privilege resulted in the use of methods requiring lower levels of fertility work. We found some evidence supporting the strain perspective. Younger women (20-34) who differed from their partners along two or more dimensions were less likely to use contraceptive methods requiring ongoing effort and coordination (i.e., LARCs, other hormonal methods, and non-hormonal methods). This association was not observed among women aged 35-45. Despite the more permanent nature of marriage/cohabitation, differences between partners in heterogamous relationships may factor into the contraceptive decision-making process, especially among younger adults at earlier stages of their relationships.}},
author = {{Stanfors, Maria and Jacobs, Josephine}},
issn = {{1569-4909}},
keywords = {{heterogamy; contraception; marriage/cohabitation; United States; National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG); multinomial logistic regression}},
language = {{eng}},
publisher = {{Elsevier}},
series = {{Advances in Life Course Research}},
title = {{Heterogamy and contraceptive use among married and cohabiting women}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2022.100492}},
doi = {{10.1016/j.alcr.2022.100492}},
volume = {{53}},
year = {{2022}},
}