Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

The CPS triangle : A suggested framework for evaluating robots in everyday life

Frennert, Susanne LU orcid (2018) 10th International Conference on Social Robotics, ICSR 2018 In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) 11357 LNAI. p.369-379
Abstract

This paper introduces a conceptual framework: the CPS triangle, which has evolved over four years of research on ‘older people meet robots’. It is a synthesis of domestication theory, modern social practice theory and empirical data. Case studies on the domestication of one current technology, the robotic vacuum cleaner, and two emergent technologies, the eHealth system and the service robot, provide empirical evidence. Considering ‘older people meet robots’ within the framework of the proposed CPS triangle can help us to understand older people’s domestication or rejection of robots. In the CPS triangle, C represents the cognitive dimension; P, the practical dimension; and S, the symbolic dimension. The CPS triangle is meant to serve... (More)

This paper introduces a conceptual framework: the CPS triangle, which has evolved over four years of research on ‘older people meet robots’. It is a synthesis of domestication theory, modern social practice theory and empirical data. Case studies on the domestication of one current technology, the robotic vacuum cleaner, and two emergent technologies, the eHealth system and the service robot, provide empirical evidence. Considering ‘older people meet robots’ within the framework of the proposed CPS triangle can help us to understand older people’s domestication or rejection of robots. In the CPS triangle, C represents the cognitive dimension; P, the practical dimension; and S, the symbolic dimension. The CPS triangle is meant to serve as a tool rather than a rule. It is recommended that the CPS triangle be tested more widely in a range of contexts. It will require adaptation and customisation for the context of use.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
publishing date
type
Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Framework, In ‘the wild’, Older people, Robots
host publication
Social Robotics - 10th International Conference, ICSR 2018, Proceedings
series title
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
editor
Broadbent, Elizabeth ; Ge, Shuzhi Sam ; Salichs, Miguel A. ; Castro-González, Álvaro ; He, Hongsheng ; Cabibihan, John-John and Wagner, Alan R.
volume
11357 LNAI
pages
11 pages
publisher
Springer
conference name
10th International Conference on Social Robotics, ICSR 2018
conference location
Qingdao, China
conference dates
2018-11-28 - 2018-11-30
external identifiers
  • scopus:85058275747
ISSN
0302-9743
1611-3349
ISBN
9783030052034
DOI
10.1007/978-3-030-05204-1_36
language
English
LU publication?
no
additional info
Publisher Copyright: © 2018, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
id
d175d434-c2b6-4531-8e36-2d9efd037757
date added to LUP
2024-12-10 13:38:47
date last changed
2025-04-04 15:11:58
@inproceedings{d175d434-c2b6-4531-8e36-2d9efd037757,
  abstract     = {{<p>This paper introduces a conceptual framework: the CPS triangle, which has evolved over four years of research on ‘older people meet robots’. It is a synthesis of domestication theory, modern social practice theory and empirical data. Case studies on the domestication of one current technology, the robotic vacuum cleaner, and two emergent technologies, the eHealth system and the service robot, provide empirical evidence. Considering ‘older people meet robots’ within the framework of the proposed CPS triangle can help us to understand older people’s domestication or rejection of robots. In the CPS triangle, C represents the cognitive dimension; P, the practical dimension; and S, the symbolic dimension. The CPS triangle is meant to serve as a tool rather than a rule. It is recommended that the CPS triangle be tested more widely in a range of contexts. It will require adaptation and customisation for the context of use.</p>}},
  author       = {{Frennert, Susanne}},
  booktitle    = {{Social Robotics - 10th International Conference, ICSR 2018, Proceedings}},
  editor       = {{Broadbent, Elizabeth and Ge, Shuzhi Sam and Salichs, Miguel A. and Castro-González, Álvaro and He, Hongsheng and Cabibihan, John-John and Wagner, Alan R.}},
  isbn         = {{9783030052034}},
  issn         = {{0302-9743}},
  keywords     = {{Framework; In ‘the wild’; Older people; Robots}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  pages        = {{369--379}},
  publisher    = {{Springer}},
  series       = {{Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)}},
  title        = {{The CPS triangle : A suggested framework for evaluating robots in everyday life}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05204-1_36}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/978-3-030-05204-1_36}},
  volume       = {{11357 LNAI}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}