Introduction: Rationale and criteria for a normative assessment of the reasoning of the Court of Justice of the EU
(2026) p.1-25- Abstract
- The book’s aim is to systematize normative assessments of the Court of Justice of the European Union’s decision-making process, defining ‘normative’ as an evaluation based on openly acknowledged, theoretically informed standards that take into account the institutional reality of the Court. This is important because the stakes are very high: the Court is a very influential institution, and the motivations for its judgments are a safeguard against arbitrariness and indirectly serve people’s sovereignty. The introduction proposes a framework for structuring these assessments based on their object (process, justification, or outcome) and the benchmarks used for evaluation, such as standards of rational argumentation, coherence, and procedural... (More)
- The book’s aim is to systematize normative assessments of the Court of Justice of the European Union’s decision-making process, defining ‘normative’ as an evaluation based on openly acknowledged, theoretically informed standards that take into account the institutional reality of the Court. This is important because the stakes are very high: the Court is a very influential institution, and the motivations for its judgments are a safeguard against arbitrariness and indirectly serve people’s sovereignty. The introduction proposes a framework for structuring these assessments based on their object (process, justification, or outcome) and the benchmarks used for evaluation, such as standards of rational argumentation, coherence, and procedural fairness. This provides a structured foundation for the subsequent chapters’ analyses.
(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/d3df14fe-7e8b-4f8d-9976-fe9578f87bd0
- author
- Loxa, Alezini
LU
and Lonardo, Luigi
- organization
- publishing date
- 2026
- type
- Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- EU law, EU-rätt
- host publication
- The reasoning of the Court of Justice of the EU: A Normative Assessment
- editor
- Lonardo, Luigi and Loxa, Alezini
- pages
- 25 pages
- publisher
- Oxford University Press
- ISBN
- 9780198983002
- 9780198982982
- project
- The Legal Reasoning of the Court of Justice of the EU: A Normative Assessment
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- d3df14fe-7e8b-4f8d-9976-fe9578f87bd0
- alternative location
- https://academic.oup.com/book/62516/chapter/559573728
- date added to LUP
- 2025-09-03 18:18:14
- date last changed
- 2026-04-14 03:18:25
@inbook{d3df14fe-7e8b-4f8d-9976-fe9578f87bd0,
abstract = {{The book’s aim is to systematize normative assessments of the Court of Justice of the European Union’s decision-making process, defining ‘normative’ as an evaluation based on openly acknowledged, theoretically informed standards that take into account the institutional reality of the Court. This is important because the stakes are very high: the Court is a very influential institution, and the motivations for its judgments are a safeguard against arbitrariness and indirectly serve people’s sovereignty. The introduction proposes a framework for structuring these assessments based on their object (process, justification, or outcome) and the benchmarks used for evaluation, such as standards of rational argumentation, coherence, and procedural fairness. This provides a structured foundation for the subsequent chapters’ analyses.<br/>}},
author = {{Loxa, Alezini and Lonardo, Luigi}},
booktitle = {{The reasoning of the Court of Justice of the EU: A Normative Assessment}},
editor = {{Lonardo, Luigi and Loxa, Alezini}},
isbn = {{9780198983002}},
keywords = {{EU law; EU-rätt}},
language = {{eng}},
pages = {{1--25}},
publisher = {{Oxford University Press}},
title = {{Introduction: Rationale and criteria for a normative assessment of the reasoning of the Court of Justice of the EU}},
url = {{https://academic.oup.com/book/62516/chapter/559573728}},
year = {{2026}},
}