Short hospital stay augmented with education and home-based rehabilitation improves function and quality of life after hip replacement - Randomized study of 50 patients with 6 months of follow-up
(2005) In Acta Orthopaedica 76(4). p.555-562- Abstract
- Background Because of current cost restrictions, we studied the effect of a shorter hospital stay on function, pain and quality of life (QOL) after total hip replacement (THR). Patients and methods 50 patients from two hospitals were randomized into a study group (SG) of 27 patients receiving preoperative and postoperative education programs, as well as home visits from an outpatient team, and a control group (CG) of 23 patients receiving "conventional" rehabilitation often augmented by a stay at a rehabilitation center. Results Mean hospital stay was shorter for the SG than for the CG (6.4 days and 10 days, respectively; p < 0.001). During the 6-month study period, there were 9 non-fatal complications in the SG and 12 in the CG (p =... (More)
- Background Because of current cost restrictions, we studied the effect of a shorter hospital stay on function, pain and quality of life (QOL) after total hip replacement (THR). Patients and methods 50 patients from two hospitals were randomized into a study group (SG) of 27 patients receiving preoperative and postoperative education programs, as well as home visits from an outpatient team, and a control group (CG) of 23 patients receiving "conventional" rehabilitation often augmented by a stay at a rehabilitation center. Results Mean hospital stay was shorter for the SG than for the CG (6.4 days and 10 days, respectively; p < 0.001). During the 6-month study period, there were 9 non-fatal complications in the SG and 12 in the CG (p = 0.3). The difference in Oxford Hip Score between the groups was not statistically significant before the operation, but was better for the SG at 2 months (p = 0.03) and this difference remained more or less constant throughout the study. The overall score from the Nottingham Health Profile indicated a better QOL in the SG. Interpretation Our preoperative education program, followed by postoperative home-based rehabilitation, appears to be safer and more effective in improving function and QOL after THR than conventional treatment. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/226480
- author
- Siggeirsdottir, K ; Olafsson, O ; Jonsson, H ; Iwarsson, Susanne LU ; Gudnason, V and Jonsson, Brynjolfur LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2005
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- Acta Orthopaedica
- volume
- 76
- issue
- 4
- pages
- 555 - 562
- publisher
- Taylor & Francis
- external identifiers
-
- pmid:16195074
- wos:000231614200017
- scopus:24144461629
- ISSN
- 1745-3682
- DOI
- 10.1080/17453670510041565
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- additional info
- The information about affiliations in this record was updated in December 2015. The record was previously connected to the following departments: Division of Occupational Therapy (Closed 2012) (013025000), Clinical and Molecular Osteoporosis Research Unit (013242930)
- id
- d7a00025-eace-40b9-af7b-4db2cdf2e28d (old id 226480)
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-01 15:28:59
- date last changed
- 2024-04-25 11:38:13
@article{d7a00025-eace-40b9-af7b-4db2cdf2e28d, abstract = {{Background Because of current cost restrictions, we studied the effect of a shorter hospital stay on function, pain and quality of life (QOL) after total hip replacement (THR). Patients and methods 50 patients from two hospitals were randomized into a study group (SG) of 27 patients receiving preoperative and postoperative education programs, as well as home visits from an outpatient team, and a control group (CG) of 23 patients receiving "conventional" rehabilitation often augmented by a stay at a rehabilitation center. Results Mean hospital stay was shorter for the SG than for the CG (6.4 days and 10 days, respectively; p < 0.001). During the 6-month study period, there were 9 non-fatal complications in the SG and 12 in the CG (p = 0.3). The difference in Oxford Hip Score between the groups was not statistically significant before the operation, but was better for the SG at 2 months (p = 0.03) and this difference remained more or less constant throughout the study. The overall score from the Nottingham Health Profile indicated a better QOL in the SG. Interpretation Our preoperative education program, followed by postoperative home-based rehabilitation, appears to be safer and more effective in improving function and QOL after THR than conventional treatment.}}, author = {{Siggeirsdottir, K and Olafsson, O and Jonsson, H and Iwarsson, Susanne and Gudnason, V and Jonsson, Brynjolfur}}, issn = {{1745-3682}}, language = {{eng}}, number = {{4}}, pages = {{555--562}}, publisher = {{Taylor & Francis}}, series = {{Acta Orthopaedica}}, title = {{Short hospital stay augmented with education and home-based rehabilitation improves function and quality of life after hip replacement - Randomized study of 50 patients with 6 months of follow-up}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453670510041565}}, doi = {{10.1080/17453670510041565}}, volume = {{76}}, year = {{2005}}, }