Social genetic effects for drug use disorder among spouses
(2023) In Addiction 118(5). p.880-889- Abstract
Aims: Preclinical and human studies suggest that a social partner's genotype may be associated with addiction-related outcomes. This study measured whether spousal genetic makeup is associated with risk of developing drug use disorder (DUD) during marriage and whether the risk associated with a spouse's genotype could be disentangled from potentially confounding rearing environmental effects. Design: Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses. Setting: Sweden. Participants: Men and women born between 1960 and 1990 and in opposite-sex first marriages before age 35 (n = 294 748 couples). Measurements: Outcome was DUD diagnosis (inclusive of opioids, sedatives/hypnotics/anxiolytics, cocaine, cannabis, amphetamine and other... (More)
Aims: Preclinical and human studies suggest that a social partner's genotype may be associated with addiction-related outcomes. This study measured whether spousal genetic makeup is associated with risk of developing drug use disorder (DUD) during marriage and whether the risk associated with a spouse's genotype could be disentangled from potentially confounding rearing environmental effects. Design: Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses. Setting: Sweden. Participants: Men and women born between 1960 and 1990 and in opposite-sex first marriages before age 35 (n = 294 748 couples). Measurements: Outcome was DUD diagnosis (inclusive of opioids, sedatives/hypnotics/anxiolytics, cocaine, cannabis, amphetamine and other psychostimulants, hallucinogens, other drugs of abuse and combinations thereof) obtained from legal, medical and pharmacy registries. The focal predictor was family genetic risk scores for DUD (FGRS-DUD), which were inferred from diagnoses in first- through fifth-degree relatives and weighted by degree of genetic sharing. FGRS-DUD were calculated separately for each partner in a couple. Findings: Marriage to a spouse with a high FGRS-DUD was associated with increased risk of developing DUD during marriage, ORmales = 1.68 (95% CI = 1.50, 1.88) and ORfemales = 1.35 (1.16, 1.56), above and beyond the risk associated with one's own FGRS-DUD. The risk associated with a spouse's FGRS-DUD remained statistically significant after covarying for parental education. As indicated by a series of null interaction effects, there was no evidence that the risk associated with a spouse's FGRS-DUD differed depending on whether the spouse was DUD-affected, probands' probable contact with in-laws and whether the spouse was raised by his/her biological parents or in another home. Conclusions: There is relatively robust evidence that a person's risk for developing drug use disorder is associated with the genetic makeup of the person's spouse.
(Less)
- author
- Salvatore, Jessica E. ; Larsson Lönn, Sara LU ; Sundquist, Jan LU ; Kendler, Kenneth S. and Sundquist, Kristina LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2023
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Drug use disorder, family genetic risk score, marriage, metagenomics, social genetic effects, social transmission
- in
- Addiction
- volume
- 118
- issue
- 5
- pages
- 880 - 889
- publisher
- Wiley-Blackwell
- external identifiers
-
- pmid:36494088
- scopus:85145267810
- ISSN
- 0965-2140
- DOI
- 10.1111/add.16108
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- d995f1bf-3479-451f-94ea-5fe7630f020d
- date added to LUP
- 2023-02-10 14:13:51
- date last changed
- 2024-10-31 19:34:53
@article{d995f1bf-3479-451f-94ea-5fe7630f020d, abstract = {{<p>Aims: Preclinical and human studies suggest that a social partner's genotype may be associated with addiction-related outcomes. This study measured whether spousal genetic makeup is associated with risk of developing drug use disorder (DUD) during marriage and whether the risk associated with a spouse's genotype could be disentangled from potentially confounding rearing environmental effects. Design: Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses. Setting: Sweden. Participants: Men and women born between 1960 and 1990 and in opposite-sex first marriages before age 35 (n = 294 748 couples). Measurements: Outcome was DUD diagnosis (inclusive of opioids, sedatives/hypnotics/anxiolytics, cocaine, cannabis, amphetamine and other psychostimulants, hallucinogens, other drugs of abuse and combinations thereof) obtained from legal, medical and pharmacy registries. The focal predictor was family genetic risk scores for DUD (FGRS-DUD), which were inferred from diagnoses in first- through fifth-degree relatives and weighted by degree of genetic sharing. FGRS-DUD were calculated separately for each partner in a couple. Findings: Marriage to a spouse with a high FGRS-DUD was associated with increased risk of developing DUD during marriage, OR<sub>males</sub> = 1.68 (95% CI = 1.50, 1.88) and OR<sub>females</sub> = 1.35 (1.16, 1.56), above and beyond the risk associated with one's own FGRS-DUD. The risk associated with a spouse's FGRS-DUD remained statistically significant after covarying for parental education. As indicated by a series of null interaction effects, there was no evidence that the risk associated with a spouse's FGRS-DUD differed depending on whether the spouse was DUD-affected, probands' probable contact with in-laws and whether the spouse was raised by his/her biological parents or in another home. Conclusions: There is relatively robust evidence that a person's risk for developing drug use disorder is associated with the genetic makeup of the person's spouse.</p>}}, author = {{Salvatore, Jessica E. and Larsson Lönn, Sara and Sundquist, Jan and Kendler, Kenneth S. and Sundquist, Kristina}}, issn = {{0965-2140}}, keywords = {{Drug use disorder; family genetic risk score; marriage; metagenomics; social genetic effects; social transmission}}, language = {{eng}}, number = {{5}}, pages = {{880--889}}, publisher = {{Wiley-Blackwell}}, series = {{Addiction}}, title = {{Social genetic effects for drug use disorder among spouses}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.16108}}, doi = {{10.1111/add.16108}}, volume = {{118}}, year = {{2023}}, }