Deception among pairs: "Let's say we had lunch and hope they will swallow it!"
(2003) In Psychology, Crime and Law 9(2). p.109-124- Abstract
- Deception research has neglected the fact that legal-workers often have to try to detect deceit on the basis of statements derived from pairs of suspects, each having been interrogated repeatedly. To remedy this shortcoming we conducted a study where each member of 10 truth-telling pairs and 10 lying pairs was interrogated twice about an alibi. One hundred and twenty undergraduate students were enrolled as lie-catchers. The main findings were that (a) overall deception detection accuracy was modest; (b) lie-catchers given access to a large number of statements did not outperform lie-catchers given access to a lesser number of statements; (c) when asked to justify their veracity assessments the most frequently reported cue was 'consistency... (More)
- Deception research has neglected the fact that legal-workers often have to try to detect deceit on the basis of statements derived from pairs of suspects, each having been interrogated repeatedly. To remedy this shortcoming we conducted a study where each member of 10 truth-telling pairs and 10 lying pairs was interrogated twice about an alibi. One hundred and twenty undergraduate students were enrolled as lie-catchers. The main findings were that (a) overall deception detection accuracy was modest; (b) lie-catchers given access to a large number of statements did not outperform lie-catchers given access to a lesser number of statements; (c) when asked to justify their veracity assessments the most frequently reported cue was 'consistency within pairs of suspects'; (d) all cues to deception were of low diagnostic value. Psycho-legal aspects of integrating sequential information in deception detection contexts are discussed. (Less)
    Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
    https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/921297
- author
- Strömwall, Leif ; Granhan, Pär Anders and Jonsson, Anna-Carin LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2003
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Deception detection, Repeated interrogations, Diagnostic values of cues to deception, Pairs of suspects
- in
- Psychology, Crime and Law
- volume
- 9
- issue
- 2
- pages
- 109 - 124
- publisher
- Taylor & Francis
- external identifiers
- 
                - wos:000183069600001
- scopus:18844468752
 
- ISSN
- 1477-2744
- DOI
- 10.1080/1068316031000116238
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- dae324d4-ad94-452a-a15e-d5fed6c4413c (old id 921297)
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-04 10:16:34
- date last changed
- 2025-10-14 12:41:34
@article{dae324d4-ad94-452a-a15e-d5fed6c4413c,
  abstract     = {{Deception research has neglected the fact that legal-workers often have to try to detect deceit on the basis of statements derived from pairs of suspects, each having been interrogated repeatedly. To remedy this shortcoming we conducted a study where each member of 10 truth-telling pairs and 10 lying pairs was interrogated twice about an alibi. One hundred and twenty undergraduate students were enrolled as lie-catchers. The main findings were that (a) overall deception detection accuracy was modest; (b) lie-catchers given access to a large number of statements did not outperform lie-catchers given access to a lesser number of statements; (c) when asked to justify their veracity assessments the most frequently reported cue was 'consistency within pairs of suspects'; (d) all cues to deception were of low diagnostic value. Psycho-legal aspects of integrating sequential information in deception detection contexts are discussed.}},
  author       = {{Strömwall, Leif and Granhan, Pär Anders and Jonsson, Anna-Carin}},
  issn         = {{1477-2744}},
  keywords     = {{Deception detection; Repeated interrogations; Diagnostic values of cues to deception; Pairs of suspects}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{109--124}},
  publisher    = {{Taylor & Francis}},
  series       = {{Psychology, Crime and Law}},
  title        = {{Deception among pairs: "Let's say we had lunch and hope they will swallow it!"}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1068316031000116238}},
  doi          = {{10.1080/1068316031000116238}},
  volume       = {{9}},
  year         = {{2003}},
}