Interactive Interventions can Improve Hand Hygiene and Aseptic Techniques During Perioperative Care – Experience From the “Safe Hands” Project
(2023) In Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing 38(2). p.284-290- Abstract
Purpose: This paper evaluates a theory-driven, interactive hand hygiene (HH) intervention, the Safe Hands project, based on theories of organizational learning and culture including leadership support, dialogue and co-creation. Design: This prospective quasi-experimental study used unobtrusive overt observations to evaluate adherence to HH recommendations after implementing an infection-prevention intervention. Methods: The primary outcome was differences in HH practices “Before aseptic/clean procedure” (WHO moment 2), “After body fluid exposure risk” (WHO moment 3) and performance of aseptic techniques. One operating room (OR) department served as the study hospital and the other as the control hospital, both at Swedish university... (More)
Purpose: This paper evaluates a theory-driven, interactive hand hygiene (HH) intervention, the Safe Hands project, based on theories of organizational learning and culture including leadership support, dialogue and co-creation. Design: This prospective quasi-experimental study used unobtrusive overt observations to evaluate adherence to HH recommendations after implementing an infection-prevention intervention. Methods: The primary outcome was differences in HH practices “Before aseptic/clean procedure” (WHO moment 2), “After body fluid exposure risk” (WHO moment 3) and performance of aseptic techniques. One operating room (OR) department served as the study hospital and the other as the control hospital, both at Swedish university hospitals. Adherence to HH guidelines was measured 4 times during 2015 to 2017. Findings: The intervention site displayed a significant improvement in adherence to HH guidelines and aseptic techniques. WHO 2; from 23.8% to 36.2%, (P = .014), WHO 3; from 22.2% to 42.3%, (P = .002), and aseptic techniques; from 17.5% to 31.6%, (P = .003). No changes in adherence were identified at the control site. The use of contaminated gloves decreased post intervention at the study operating department. Conclusions: This study shows that implementing tailored interventions that are underpinned by theories from organizational learning and culture can improve adherence to hand hygiene in a complex setting as the OR up to 6 months post-intervention. The interprofessional co-creation of standards operating procedures addressing specific care procedures and emphasizing the importance of aseptic techniques can be an acceptable and feasible way to reduce the risks of contaminating medical devices and patients during perioperative care.
(Less)
- author
- Frödin, Maria ; Rogmark, Cecilia LU ; Nellgård, Bengt LU ; Gillespie, Brigid M. ; Wikström, Ewa and Andersson, Annette E.
- organization
- publishing date
- 2023
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- aseptic techniques, hand hygiene, infection prevention, intervention, operating room, safe hands
- in
- Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing
- volume
- 38
- issue
- 2
- pages
- 284 - 290
- publisher
- Elsevier
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85140955739
- pmid:36319520
- ISSN
- 1089-9472
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.jopan.2022.07.006
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- db86662f-ab99-49dc-bcfa-db341c5c4a85
- date added to LUP
- 2022-12-21 15:25:46
- date last changed
- 2024-06-14 00:06:33
@article{db86662f-ab99-49dc-bcfa-db341c5c4a85,
abstract = {{<p>Purpose: This paper evaluates a theory-driven, interactive hand hygiene (HH) intervention, the Safe Hands project, based on theories of organizational learning and culture including leadership support, dialogue and co-creation. Design: This prospective quasi-experimental study used unobtrusive overt observations to evaluate adherence to HH recommendations after implementing an infection-prevention intervention. Methods: The primary outcome was differences in HH practices “Before aseptic/clean procedure” (WHO moment 2), “After body fluid exposure risk” (WHO moment 3) and performance of aseptic techniques. One operating room (OR) department served as the study hospital and the other as the control hospital, both at Swedish university hospitals. Adherence to HH guidelines was measured 4 times during 2015 to 2017. Findings: The intervention site displayed a significant improvement in adherence to HH guidelines and aseptic techniques. WHO 2; from 23.8% to 36.2%, (P = .014), WHO 3; from 22.2% to 42.3%, (P = .002), and aseptic techniques; from 17.5% to 31.6%, (P = .003). No changes in adherence were identified at the control site. The use of contaminated gloves decreased post intervention at the study operating department. Conclusions: This study shows that implementing tailored interventions that are underpinned by theories from organizational learning and culture can improve adherence to hand hygiene in a complex setting as the OR up to 6 months post-intervention. The interprofessional co-creation of standards operating procedures addressing specific care procedures and emphasizing the importance of aseptic techniques can be an acceptable and feasible way to reduce the risks of contaminating medical devices and patients during perioperative care.</p>}},
author = {{Frödin, Maria and Rogmark, Cecilia and Nellgård, Bengt and Gillespie, Brigid M. and Wikström, Ewa and Andersson, Annette E.}},
issn = {{1089-9472}},
keywords = {{aseptic techniques; hand hygiene; infection prevention; intervention; operating room; safe hands}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{2}},
pages = {{284--290}},
publisher = {{Elsevier}},
series = {{Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing}},
title = {{Interactive Interventions can Improve Hand Hygiene and Aseptic Techniques During Perioperative Care – Experience From the “Safe Hands” Project}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2022.07.006}},
doi = {{10.1016/j.jopan.2022.07.006}},
volume = {{38}},
year = {{2023}},
}